Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic

Background While telehealth utilization has decreased following the COVID-19 pandemic, the incorporation of remote visits into ambulatory cardiology practice guidelines remains a necessity. The aim of this study was to survey cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices post-pandemic, and to p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Miao, Claire S Duvernoy, Paul D Varosy, Paul Theriot, Anne Rzeszut, S Elissa Altin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-08-01
Series:Digital Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251364928
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849335585251000320
author Jennifer Miao
Claire S Duvernoy
Paul D Varosy
Paul Theriot
Anne Rzeszut
S Elissa Altin
author_facet Jennifer Miao
Claire S Duvernoy
Paul D Varosy
Paul Theriot
Anne Rzeszut
S Elissa Altin
author_sort Jennifer Miao
collection DOAJ
description Background While telehealth utilization has decreased following the COVID-19 pandemic, the incorporation of remote visits into ambulatory cardiology practice guidelines remains a necessity. The aim of this study was to survey cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices post-pandemic, and to propose clinical workflow models for remote visit types. Methods A 25-item survey was distributed to 481 American College of Cardiology CardioSurve panelists from 14 April 2023 through 11 May 2023. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate provider demographics and reported percentages of responses to opinions and statements in the questionnaire. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to determine statistically significant associations between categorical variables. Kruskal–Wallis H tests were performed on telemedicine visit frequency offered before, during, and after the pandemic. Results Seventy percent of respondents continue to offer telemedicine visits post-pandemic. Early career cardiologists were more likely to offer telemedicine visits compared to later career colleagues ( p  = 0.004). The odds ratio for offering telemedicine visits for early career compared to late-career was 5.56 (95% CI [1.910, 16.277]) and 1.394 (95% CI [0.594, 3.269]) for mid-career compared to late-career. Sixty-three percent of respondents reported that lack of reliable internet access posed challenges for outpatient visits, and approximately one-third believed that the risk for malpractice increased when providing care remotely. Only 22% of cardiologists reported the use of telepresenters. Three clinical workflow models were then constructed to address potential barriers to telehealth implementation. Conclusions Cardiologists continue to offer telehealth visits, but concerns persist regarding the feasibility and appropriateness for a variety of ambulatory encounter types. To address these concerns, we have proposed several models for telehealth integration into various outpatient settings to optimize access to care and lighten the burden placed on an already diminishing cardiology workforce.
format Article
id doaj-art-0e329c5eb899416d8b36a5a08f91a1c7
institution Kabale University
issn 2055-2076
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Digital Health
spelling doaj-art-0e329c5eb899416d8b36a5a08f91a1c72025-08-20T03:45:14ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762025-08-011110.1177/20552076251364928Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemicJennifer Miao0Claire S Duvernoy1Paul D Varosy2Paul Theriot3Anne Rzeszut4S Elissa Altin5 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, , New Haven, CT, USA Department of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Section, , , Aurora, CO, USA , Washington, DC, USA , Washington, DC, USA West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, CT, USABackground While telehealth utilization has decreased following the COVID-19 pandemic, the incorporation of remote visits into ambulatory cardiology practice guidelines remains a necessity. The aim of this study was to survey cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices post-pandemic, and to propose clinical workflow models for remote visit types. Methods A 25-item survey was distributed to 481 American College of Cardiology CardioSurve panelists from 14 April 2023 through 11 May 2023. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate provider demographics and reported percentages of responses to opinions and statements in the questionnaire. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to determine statistically significant associations between categorical variables. Kruskal–Wallis H tests were performed on telemedicine visit frequency offered before, during, and after the pandemic. Results Seventy percent of respondents continue to offer telemedicine visits post-pandemic. Early career cardiologists were more likely to offer telemedicine visits compared to later career colleagues ( p  = 0.004). The odds ratio for offering telemedicine visits for early career compared to late-career was 5.56 (95% CI [1.910, 16.277]) and 1.394 (95% CI [0.594, 3.269]) for mid-career compared to late-career. Sixty-three percent of respondents reported that lack of reliable internet access posed challenges for outpatient visits, and approximately one-third believed that the risk for malpractice increased when providing care remotely. Only 22% of cardiologists reported the use of telepresenters. Three clinical workflow models were then constructed to address potential barriers to telehealth implementation. Conclusions Cardiologists continue to offer telehealth visits, but concerns persist regarding the feasibility and appropriateness for a variety of ambulatory encounter types. To address these concerns, we have proposed several models for telehealth integration into various outpatient settings to optimize access to care and lighten the burden placed on an already diminishing cardiology workforce.https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251364928
spellingShingle Jennifer Miao
Claire S Duvernoy
Paul D Varosy
Paul Theriot
Anne Rzeszut
S Elissa Altin
Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic
Digital Health
title Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort cardiologists perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the covid 19 pandemic
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251364928
work_keys_str_mv AT jennifermiao cardiologistsperceptionsontelehealthpracticesandlimitationsduringandfollowingthecovid19pandemic
AT clairesduvernoy cardiologistsperceptionsontelehealthpracticesandlimitationsduringandfollowingthecovid19pandemic
AT pauldvarosy cardiologistsperceptionsontelehealthpracticesandlimitationsduringandfollowingthecovid19pandemic
AT paultheriot cardiologistsperceptionsontelehealthpracticesandlimitationsduringandfollowingthecovid19pandemic
AT annerzeszut cardiologistsperceptionsontelehealthpracticesandlimitationsduringandfollowingthecovid19pandemic
AT selissaaltin cardiologistsperceptionsontelehealthpracticesandlimitationsduringandfollowingthecovid19pandemic