Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with PPCI

Background. Several risk scores have been developed to predict and analyze in-hospital mortality and short- and long-term outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI); these can classify patients as having a high or low risk...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chih-Hwa Wang, Hui-Ting Wang, Kuan-Han Wu, Fu-Jen Cheng, Cheng-I. Cheng, Chia-Te Kung, Fu-Cheng Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Emergency Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5389072
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547963894759424
author Chih-Hwa Wang
Hui-Ting Wang
Kuan-Han Wu
Fu-Jen Cheng
Cheng-I. Cheng
Chia-Te Kung
Fu-Cheng Chen
author_facet Chih-Hwa Wang
Hui-Ting Wang
Kuan-Han Wu
Fu-Jen Cheng
Cheng-I. Cheng
Chia-Te Kung
Fu-Cheng Chen
author_sort Chih-Hwa Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background. Several risk scores have been developed to predict and analyze in-hospital mortality and short- and long-term outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI); these can classify patients as having a high or low risk of death or complications. Objective. To compare the prognostic precision of four risk scores for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI between 2012 and 2019 (N = 1346). GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events), CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications), Zwolle, and TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) risk scores were calculated for each patient according to different variables. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of these scores for in-hospital mortality using the C statistic, which was obtained using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results. The GRACE, CADILLAC, Zwolle, and TIMI risk scores all had good predictive precision for in-hospital mortality, with C statistics ranging from 0.842 to 0.923. The GRACE and CADILLAC risk scores were found to be superior. Conclusions. All GRACE, CADILLAC, Zwolle, and TIMI risk scores showed a high predictive value for in-hospital mortality due to all causes in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI. The GRACE and CADILLAC risk scores revealed a better accuracy for predicting in-hospital mortality than the Zwolle and TIMI risk scores.
format Article
id doaj-art-0e0e6bc6ee944c1a825637b1d0189703
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2859
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Emergency Medicine International
spelling doaj-art-0e0e6bc6ee944c1a825637b1d01897032025-02-03T06:42:43ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28592022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5389072Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with PPCIChih-Hwa Wang0Hui-Ting Wang1Kuan-Han Wu2Fu-Jen Cheng3Cheng-I. Cheng4Chia-Te Kung5Fu-Cheng Chen6Department of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineDivision of CardiologyDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineBackground. Several risk scores have been developed to predict and analyze in-hospital mortality and short- and long-term outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI); these can classify patients as having a high or low risk of death or complications. Objective. To compare the prognostic precision of four risk scores for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI between 2012 and 2019 (N = 1346). GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events), CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications), Zwolle, and TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) risk scores were calculated for each patient according to different variables. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of these scores for in-hospital mortality using the C statistic, which was obtained using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results. The GRACE, CADILLAC, Zwolle, and TIMI risk scores all had good predictive precision for in-hospital mortality, with C statistics ranging from 0.842 to 0.923. The GRACE and CADILLAC risk scores were found to be superior. Conclusions. All GRACE, CADILLAC, Zwolle, and TIMI risk scores showed a high predictive value for in-hospital mortality due to all causes in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI. The GRACE and CADILLAC risk scores revealed a better accuracy for predicting in-hospital mortality than the Zwolle and TIMI risk scores.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5389072
spellingShingle Chih-Hwa Wang
Hui-Ting Wang
Kuan-Han Wu
Fu-Jen Cheng
Cheng-I. Cheng
Chia-Te Kung
Fu-Cheng Chen
Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with PPCI
Emergency Medicine International
title Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with PPCI
title_full Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with PPCI
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with PPCI
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with PPCI
title_short Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with PPCI
title_sort comparison of different risk scores for prediction of in hospital mortality in stemi patients treated with ppci
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5389072
work_keys_str_mv AT chihhwawang comparisonofdifferentriskscoresforpredictionofinhospitalmortalityinstemipatientstreatedwithppci
AT huitingwang comparisonofdifferentriskscoresforpredictionofinhospitalmortalityinstemipatientstreatedwithppci
AT kuanhanwu comparisonofdifferentriskscoresforpredictionofinhospitalmortalityinstemipatientstreatedwithppci
AT fujencheng comparisonofdifferentriskscoresforpredictionofinhospitalmortalityinstemipatientstreatedwithppci
AT chengicheng comparisonofdifferentriskscoresforpredictionofinhospitalmortalityinstemipatientstreatedwithppci
AT chiatekung comparisonofdifferentriskscoresforpredictionofinhospitalmortalityinstemipatientstreatedwithppci
AT fuchengchen comparisonofdifferentriskscoresforpredictionofinhospitalmortalityinstemipatientstreatedwithppci