Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Spinal infections (SI) typically manifest with and pose a growing medical challenge. However, current evidence for treating SI is limited and inconclusive. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic disc decompression (PEDD) for SI. Methods On 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guozhong Zhou, Xiaorong Liu, Zhi Liang, Xuesong Chen, Chao Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05540-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861779873136640
author Guozhong Zhou
Xiaorong Liu
Zhi Liang
Xuesong Chen
Chao Song
author_facet Guozhong Zhou
Xiaorong Liu
Zhi Liang
Xuesong Chen
Chao Song
author_sort Guozhong Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Spinal infections (SI) typically manifest with and pose a growing medical challenge. However, current evidence for treating SI is limited and inconclusive. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic disc decompression (PEDD) for SI. Methods On 20 October 2023, we searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine Disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases for eligible studies. Cohort studies on SI treated with PEDD, reporting relevant effectiveness or safety outcomes. We assessed study quality using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled results. Results Overall, 36 studies involving 925 patients were included. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels decreased significantly at 1-week postoperatively compared with preoperative levels (mean difference [MD] = − 13.48 [95% CI − 15.65 to − 11.31]) and continued to decrease over 3 months. Similarly, the c-reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale, and oswestry disability index scores significantly reduced postoperatively. The rates of excellent or good MacNab classification were 92.6% (95% CI 84.1–98.1%). Microbiological diagnostics revealed a 71.7% (95% CI 65.5–77.6%) positive rate in tissue cultures, surpassing blood cultures (odds ratio [OR] 2.72 [95% CI 1.01–7.30]). The rates of complication, reoperation, and mortality were 4.1% (95% CI 1.5–8.0%), 8.6% (95% CI 4.3–14.3%), and 1.7% (95% CI 0.4–4.1%), respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a significantly lower reoperation rate in the group that discontinued antibiotics based on a normal CRP than in the fixed-duration group (2.7% [95% CI 0.3–7.7%] vs 20.1% [95% CI 14.5–26.3%], p = 0.0002). Conversely, ambulation 1 day postoperatively was associated with a higher reoperation rate than ambulation within 5–14 days (16.2% [95% CI 9.3–24.6%] vs 1.1% [95% CI 0.0–6.0%], p = 0.0060). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that PEDD is a potentially effective and safe intervention for SI. Optimizing antibiotic discontinuation and postoperative care strategies may contribute to reducing reoperation rate. However, these findings require further validation from controlled studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-0df950f54c32403aaea41fd6af82bb35
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-0df950f54c32403aaea41fd6af82bb352025-02-09T12:46:52ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-02-0120111510.1186/s13018-025-05540-6Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysisGuozhong Zhou0Xiaorong Liu1Zhi Liang2Xuesong Chen3Chao Song4Department of Pain Medicine, The Affiliated Anning First People’s Hospital of Kunming University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pain Medicine, The Affiliated Anning First People’s Hospital of Kunming University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pain Medicine, The Affiliated Anning First People’s Hospital of Kunming University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pain Medicine, The Affiliated Anning First People’s Hospital of Kunming University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pain Medicine, The Affiliated Anning First People’s Hospital of Kunming University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background Spinal infections (SI) typically manifest with and pose a growing medical challenge. However, current evidence for treating SI is limited and inconclusive. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic disc decompression (PEDD) for SI. Methods On 20 October 2023, we searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine Disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases for eligible studies. Cohort studies on SI treated with PEDD, reporting relevant effectiveness or safety outcomes. We assessed study quality using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled results. Results Overall, 36 studies involving 925 patients were included. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels decreased significantly at 1-week postoperatively compared with preoperative levels (mean difference [MD] = − 13.48 [95% CI − 15.65 to − 11.31]) and continued to decrease over 3 months. Similarly, the c-reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale, and oswestry disability index scores significantly reduced postoperatively. The rates of excellent or good MacNab classification were 92.6% (95% CI 84.1–98.1%). Microbiological diagnostics revealed a 71.7% (95% CI 65.5–77.6%) positive rate in tissue cultures, surpassing blood cultures (odds ratio [OR] 2.72 [95% CI 1.01–7.30]). The rates of complication, reoperation, and mortality were 4.1% (95% CI 1.5–8.0%), 8.6% (95% CI 4.3–14.3%), and 1.7% (95% CI 0.4–4.1%), respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a significantly lower reoperation rate in the group that discontinued antibiotics based on a normal CRP than in the fixed-duration group (2.7% [95% CI 0.3–7.7%] vs 20.1% [95% CI 14.5–26.3%], p = 0.0002). Conversely, ambulation 1 day postoperatively was associated with a higher reoperation rate than ambulation within 5–14 days (16.2% [95% CI 9.3–24.6%] vs 1.1% [95% CI 0.0–6.0%], p = 0.0060). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that PEDD is a potentially effective and safe intervention for SI. Optimizing antibiotic discontinuation and postoperative care strategies may contribute to reducing reoperation rate. However, these findings require further validation from controlled studies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05540-6Spinal infectionPercutaneous endoscopicMinimally invasionEffectivenessSafety
spellingShingle Guozhong Zhou
Xiaorong Liu
Zhi Liang
Xuesong Chen
Chao Song
Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Spinal infection
Percutaneous endoscopic
Minimally invasion
Effectiveness
Safety
title Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Spinal infection
Percutaneous endoscopic
Minimally invasion
Effectiveness
Safety
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05540-6
work_keys_str_mv AT guozhongzhou effectivenessandsafetyofpercutaneousendoscopicdebridementanddrainageforspinalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaorongliu effectivenessandsafetyofpercutaneousendoscopicdebridementanddrainageforspinalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhiliang effectivenessandsafetyofpercutaneousendoscopicdebridementanddrainageforspinalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuesongchen effectivenessandsafetyofpercutaneousendoscopicdebridementanddrainageforspinalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chaosong effectivenessandsafetyofpercutaneousendoscopicdebridementanddrainageforspinalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis