Comparing Reflectivity from Space-Based and Ground-Based Radars During Detection of Rainbands in Two Tropical Cyclones

With varying tangential winds and combinations of stratiform and convective clouds, tropical cyclones (TCs) can be difficult to accurately portray when mosaicking data from ground-based radars. This study utilizes the Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) from the Global Precipitation Measurement...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corene J. Matyas, Stephanie E. Zick, Kimberly M. Wood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/16/3/307
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850090374354173952
author Corene J. Matyas
Stephanie E. Zick
Kimberly M. Wood
author_facet Corene J. Matyas
Stephanie E. Zick
Kimberly M. Wood
author_sort Corene J. Matyas
collection DOAJ
description With varying tangential winds and combinations of stratiform and convective clouds, tropical cyclones (TCs) can be difficult to accurately portray when mosaicking data from ground-based radars. This study utilizes the Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) from the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) satellite to evaluate reflectivity obtained using four sampling methods of Weather Surveillance Radar 1988-Doppler data, including ground radars (GRs) in the GPM ground validation network and three mosaics, specifically the Multi-Radar/Multi-Sensor System plus two we created by retaining the maximum value in each grid cell (MAX) and using a distance-weighted function (DW). We analyzed Hurricane Laura (2020), with a strong gradient in tangential winds, and Tropical Storm Isaias (2020), where more stratiform precipitation was present. Differences between DPR and GR reflectivity were larger compared to previous studies that did not focus on TCs. Retaining the maximum value produced higher values than other sampling methods, and these values were closest to DPR. However, some MAX values were too high when DPR time offsets were greater than 120 s. The MAX method produces a more consistent match to DPR than the other mosaics when reflectivity is <35 dBZ. However, even MAX values are 3–4 dBZ lower than DPR in higher-reflectivity regions where gradients are stronger and features change quickly. The DW and MRMS mosaics produced values that were similar to one another but lower than DPR and MAX values.
format Article
id doaj-art-0de2439b9067465ebd89efcfffa1357f
institution DOAJ
issn 2073-4433
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj-art-0de2439b9067465ebd89efcfffa1357f2025-08-20T02:42:35ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332025-03-0116330710.3390/atmos16030307Comparing Reflectivity from Space-Based and Ground-Based Radars During Detection of Rainbands in Two Tropical CyclonesCorene J. Matyas0Stephanie E. Zick1Kimberly M. Wood2Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USADepartment of Geography, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USAWith varying tangential winds and combinations of stratiform and convective clouds, tropical cyclones (TCs) can be difficult to accurately portray when mosaicking data from ground-based radars. This study utilizes the Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) from the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) satellite to evaluate reflectivity obtained using four sampling methods of Weather Surveillance Radar 1988-Doppler data, including ground radars (GRs) in the GPM ground validation network and three mosaics, specifically the Multi-Radar/Multi-Sensor System plus two we created by retaining the maximum value in each grid cell (MAX) and using a distance-weighted function (DW). We analyzed Hurricane Laura (2020), with a strong gradient in tangential winds, and Tropical Storm Isaias (2020), where more stratiform precipitation was present. Differences between DPR and GR reflectivity were larger compared to previous studies that did not focus on TCs. Retaining the maximum value produced higher values than other sampling methods, and these values were closest to DPR. However, some MAX values were too high when DPR time offsets were greater than 120 s. The MAX method produces a more consistent match to DPR than the other mosaics when reflectivity is <35 dBZ. However, even MAX values are 3–4 dBZ lower than DPR in higher-reflectivity regions where gradients are stronger and features change quickly. The DW and MRMS mosaics produced values that were similar to one another but lower than DPR and MAX values.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/16/3/307radartropical cyclonemosaic
spellingShingle Corene J. Matyas
Stephanie E. Zick
Kimberly M. Wood
Comparing Reflectivity from Space-Based and Ground-Based Radars During Detection of Rainbands in Two Tropical Cyclones
Atmosphere
radar
tropical cyclone
mosaic
title Comparing Reflectivity from Space-Based and Ground-Based Radars During Detection of Rainbands in Two Tropical Cyclones
title_full Comparing Reflectivity from Space-Based and Ground-Based Radars During Detection of Rainbands in Two Tropical Cyclones
title_fullStr Comparing Reflectivity from Space-Based and Ground-Based Radars During Detection of Rainbands in Two Tropical Cyclones
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Reflectivity from Space-Based and Ground-Based Radars During Detection of Rainbands in Two Tropical Cyclones
title_short Comparing Reflectivity from Space-Based and Ground-Based Radars During Detection of Rainbands in Two Tropical Cyclones
title_sort comparing reflectivity from space based and ground based radars during detection of rainbands in two tropical cyclones
topic radar
tropical cyclone
mosaic
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/16/3/307
work_keys_str_mv AT corenejmatyas comparingreflectivityfromspacebasedandgroundbasedradarsduringdetectionofrainbandsintwotropicalcyclones
AT stephanieezick comparingreflectivityfromspacebasedandgroundbasedradarsduringdetectionofrainbandsintwotropicalcyclones
AT kimberlymwood comparingreflectivityfromspacebasedandgroundbasedradarsduringdetectionofrainbandsintwotropicalcyclones