Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?

Conservation policies for biodiversity, major consumers of spatial data, is now facing a double movement: the lack of public funding for environmental recognition and the rise of participatory mapping. Official information, which is developing with difficulty, is today overwhelmed by the plethora of inf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xavier Amelot, Laurent Couderchet, Matthieu Noucher
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: OpenEdition 2017-04-01
Series:M@ppemonde
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/mappemonde/2861
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849424231354335232
author Xavier Amelot
Laurent Couderchet
Matthieu Noucher
author_facet Xavier Amelot
Laurent Couderchet
Matthieu Noucher
author_sort Xavier Amelot
collection DOAJ
description Conservation policies for biodiversity, major consumers of spatial data, is now facing a double movement: the lack of public funding for environmental recognition and the rise of participatory mapping. Official information, which is developing with difficulty, is today overwhelmed by the plethora of information unofficially gathered and published on the Internet. This is a discussion of the legitimacy of such data and its admissibility by conservation policies.
format Article
id doaj-art-0da16900e63442e6aa19073ef7807bde
institution Kabale University
issn 0764-3470
1769-7298
language Spanish
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher OpenEdition
record_format Article
series M@ppemonde
spelling doaj-art-0da16900e63442e6aa19073ef7807bde2025-08-20T03:30:18ZspaOpenEditionM@ppemonde0764-34701769-72982017-04-0112010.4000/mappemonde.2861Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?Xavier AmelotLaurent CouderchetMatthieu NoucherConservation policies for biodiversity, major consumers of spatial data, is now facing a double movement: the lack of public funding for environmental recognition and the rise of participatory mapping. Official information, which is developing with difficulty, is today overwhelmed by the plethora of information unofficially gathered and published on the Internet. This is a discussion of the legitimacy of such data and its admissibility by conservation policies.https://journals.openedition.org/mappemonde/2861web-mapping 2.0volunteered geographic informationdata legitimacybiodiversity politics
spellingShingle Xavier Amelot
Laurent Couderchet
Matthieu Noucher
Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
M@ppemonde
web-mapping 2.0
volunteered geographic information
data legitimacy
biodiversity politics
title Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_full Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_fullStr Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_full_unstemmed Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_short Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_sort donnees institutionnelles et donnees contributives sur la biodiversite quelle legitimite
topic web-mapping 2.0
volunteered geographic information
data legitimacy
biodiversity politics
url https://journals.openedition.org/mappemonde/2861
work_keys_str_mv AT xavieramelot donneesinstitutionnellesetdonneescontributivessurlabiodiversitequellelegitimite
AT laurentcouderchet donneesinstitutionnellesetdonneescontributivessurlabiodiversitequellelegitimite
AT matthieunoucher donneesinstitutionnellesetdonneescontributivessurlabiodiversitequellelegitimite