Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review.
<h4>Background</h4>Patients are at risk for harm when treated simultaneously by healthcare providers from different healthcare organisations. To assess current practice and improvements of transitional patient safety, valid measurement tools are needed.<h4>Aim and methods</h4>...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197312 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849434964688371712 |
|---|---|
| author | Marije A van Melle Henk F van Stel Judith M Poldervaart Niek J de Wit Dorien L M Zwart |
| author_facet | Marije A van Melle Henk F van Stel Judith M Poldervaart Niek J de Wit Dorien L M Zwart |
| author_sort | Marije A van Melle |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Patients are at risk for harm when treated simultaneously by healthcare providers from different healthcare organisations. To assess current practice and improvements of transitional patient safety, valid measurement tools are needed.<h4>Aim and methods</h4>To identify and appraise all measurement tools and outcomes that measure aspects of transitional patient safety, PubMed, Cinahl, Embase and Psychinfo were systematically searched. Two researchers performed the title and abstract and full-text selection. First, publications about validation of measurement tools were appraised for quality following COSMIN criteria. Second, we inventoried all measurement tools and outcome measures found in our search that assessed current transitional patient safety or the effect of interventions targeting transitional patient safety.<h4>Results</h4>The initial search yielded 8288 studies, of which 18 assessed validity of measurement tools of different aspects of transitional safety, and 191 assessed current transitional patient safety or effect of interventions. In the validated measurement tools, the overall quality of content and structural validity was acceptable; other COSMIN criteria, such as reliability, measurement error and responsiveness, were mostly poor or not reported. In our outcome inventory, the most frequently used validated outcome measure was the Care Transition Measure (n = 9). The most frequently used non-validated outcome measures were: medication discrepancies (n = 98), hospital readmissions (n = 55), adverse events (n = 34), emergency department visits (n = 33), (mental or physical) health status (n = 28), quality and timeliness of discharge summary, and patient satisfaction (n = 23).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Although no validated measures exist that assess all aspects of transitional patient safety, we found validated measurement tools on specific aspects. Reporting of validity of transitional measurement tools was incomplete. Numerous outcome measures with unknown measurement properties are used in current studies on safety of care transitions, which makes interpretation or comparison of their results uncertain. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0d9cc29739cb4dfca22a61be8ed48531 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-0d9cc29739cb4dfca22a61be8ed485312025-08-20T03:26:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01136e019731210.1371/journal.pone.0197312Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review.Marije A van MelleHenk F van StelJudith M PoldervaartNiek J de WitDorien L M Zwart<h4>Background</h4>Patients are at risk for harm when treated simultaneously by healthcare providers from different healthcare organisations. To assess current practice and improvements of transitional patient safety, valid measurement tools are needed.<h4>Aim and methods</h4>To identify and appraise all measurement tools and outcomes that measure aspects of transitional patient safety, PubMed, Cinahl, Embase and Psychinfo were systematically searched. Two researchers performed the title and abstract and full-text selection. First, publications about validation of measurement tools were appraised for quality following COSMIN criteria. Second, we inventoried all measurement tools and outcome measures found in our search that assessed current transitional patient safety or the effect of interventions targeting transitional patient safety.<h4>Results</h4>The initial search yielded 8288 studies, of which 18 assessed validity of measurement tools of different aspects of transitional safety, and 191 assessed current transitional patient safety or effect of interventions. In the validated measurement tools, the overall quality of content and structural validity was acceptable; other COSMIN criteria, such as reliability, measurement error and responsiveness, were mostly poor or not reported. In our outcome inventory, the most frequently used validated outcome measure was the Care Transition Measure (n = 9). The most frequently used non-validated outcome measures were: medication discrepancies (n = 98), hospital readmissions (n = 55), adverse events (n = 34), emergency department visits (n = 33), (mental or physical) health status (n = 28), quality and timeliness of discharge summary, and patient satisfaction (n = 23).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Although no validated measures exist that assess all aspects of transitional patient safety, we found validated measurement tools on specific aspects. Reporting of validity of transitional measurement tools was incomplete. Numerous outcome measures with unknown measurement properties are used in current studies on safety of care transitions, which makes interpretation or comparison of their results uncertain.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197312 |
| spellingShingle | Marije A van Melle Henk F van Stel Judith M Poldervaart Niek J de Wit Dorien L M Zwart Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review. PLoS ONE |
| title | Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review. |
| title_full | Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review. |
| title_fullStr | Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review. |
| title_short | Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review. |
| title_sort | measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety a systematic review |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197312 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marijeavanmelle measurementtoolsandoutcomemeasuresusedintransitionalpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT henkfvanstel measurementtoolsandoutcomemeasuresusedintransitionalpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT judithmpoldervaart measurementtoolsandoutcomemeasuresusedintransitionalpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT niekjdewit measurementtoolsandoutcomemeasuresusedintransitionalpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT dorienlmzwart measurementtoolsandoutcomemeasuresusedintransitionalpatientsafetyasystematicreview |