Case Weighting as a Common Yardstick: A Comparative Review of Current Uses and Future Directions
In recent years, court systems in the U.S. and abroad have begun to adopt objective, empirically based methods for determining the need for court resources. This methodology, called workload assessment or weighted caseload, provides an empirical basis to measure judicial work and assess how many ju...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Matthew Kleiman, Cynthia G. Lee, Brian J. Ostrom, Richard Y. Schauffler |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
2016-10-01
|
| Series: | Oñati Socio-Legal Series |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/824 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Summary Prosedures and Optimization of Commercial Court Proceedings in Russia
by: S. Nikitin, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Sterile pyogranulomatous nodular panniculitis in a cat - case report
by: A. Silvio Neto, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Impact of Institutional Monthly Volume of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Procedures for Significant Mitral Regurgitation: Evidence from the GIOTTO-VAT Study
by: Nicola Corcione, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
The Impact of WHO-2023 Malnutrition Criteria on Caseload of Infants Aged Under Six Months: Secondary Data Analysis
by: Ayenew Negesse, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Judicial Work and AV Use: Perceptions from Australian Courts
by: Anne Wallace, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01)