Spatial Conflicts in ‘Production, Living, and Ecological Space’ Functions at Urban Fringes: The Case of Zengcheng, Guangzhou

Understanding the interdependencies among production, living, and ecological spaces (PLESs) is critical for sustainable regional development. Urban fringe areas, shaped by rapid urbanization and conflicting land-use demands, are particularly vulnerable to spatial tensions. This study analyzes the sp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziqing Feng, Shaoqiu Long, Yilun Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/7/3483
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849730940896542720
author Ziqing Feng
Shaoqiu Long
Yilun Liu
author_facet Ziqing Feng
Shaoqiu Long
Yilun Liu
author_sort Ziqing Feng
collection DOAJ
description Understanding the interdependencies among production, living, and ecological spaces (PLESs) is critical for sustainable regional development. Urban fringe areas, shaped by rapid urbanization and conflicting land-use demands, are particularly vulnerable to spatial tensions. This study analyzes the spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of PLES conflicts in Zengcheng District, Guangzhou, a representative urban fringe region. Using land-use data from 2010 to 2020, the study applies the optimal parameter geographic detector, chosen for its ability to untangle complex spatial interactions, to quantify conflict intensity and identify key drivers. This method was chosen over other spatial analysis techniques due to its ability to effectively capture nonlinear relationships and interaction effects between variables, which traditional regression-based or spatial autocorrelation methods often fail to fully address. The results indicate that production and ecological lands dominated the landscape, while living space expansion slowed, leading to escalating conflicts, particularly in the southern and central regions. The PLES conflict index shows that severe conflict units rose from 0.89% in 2010 to 2.15% in 2020, despite over 80% of spatial units remaining stable. Moderate conflicts peaked in 2015 before declining, while stronger conflicts intensified, especially in rapidly urbanizing areas. Conflict hotspots were most pronounced in rapidly urbanizing zones, particularly at the interface of urban expansion and ecological conservation areas. Moreover, the driving forces behind these conflicts transitioned from economic and urbanization factors to a multifaceted interplay of natural and social determinants, underscoring the growing intricacy of spatial dynamics. These findings offer crucial insights into the mechanisms driving PLES conflicts, guiding urban planners and policymakers in developing strategies to balance competing land-use priorities. By quantifying conflicts and identifying key drivers, this study helps prioritize interventions that mitigate tensions between production, living, and ecological spaces, supporting policies that reconcile urban expansion with ecological preservation for sustainable development in urban fringe areas.
format Article
id doaj-art-0d341270e5d7475e8d16b541a859eaa8
institution DOAJ
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-0d341270e5d7475e8d16b541a859eaa82025-08-20T03:08:43ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172025-03-01157348310.3390/app15073483Spatial Conflicts in ‘Production, Living, and Ecological Space’ Functions at Urban Fringes: The Case of Zengcheng, GuangzhouZiqing Feng0Shaoqiu Long1Yilun Liu2College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaKey Laboratory of Redevelopment of Construction Land, Ministry of Natural Resources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaKey Laboratory of Redevelopment of Construction Land, Ministry of Natural Resources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, ChinaUnderstanding the interdependencies among production, living, and ecological spaces (PLESs) is critical for sustainable regional development. Urban fringe areas, shaped by rapid urbanization and conflicting land-use demands, are particularly vulnerable to spatial tensions. This study analyzes the spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of PLES conflicts in Zengcheng District, Guangzhou, a representative urban fringe region. Using land-use data from 2010 to 2020, the study applies the optimal parameter geographic detector, chosen for its ability to untangle complex spatial interactions, to quantify conflict intensity and identify key drivers. This method was chosen over other spatial analysis techniques due to its ability to effectively capture nonlinear relationships and interaction effects between variables, which traditional regression-based or spatial autocorrelation methods often fail to fully address. The results indicate that production and ecological lands dominated the landscape, while living space expansion slowed, leading to escalating conflicts, particularly in the southern and central regions. The PLES conflict index shows that severe conflict units rose from 0.89% in 2010 to 2.15% in 2020, despite over 80% of spatial units remaining stable. Moderate conflicts peaked in 2015 before declining, while stronger conflicts intensified, especially in rapidly urbanizing areas. Conflict hotspots were most pronounced in rapidly urbanizing zones, particularly at the interface of urban expansion and ecological conservation areas. Moreover, the driving forces behind these conflicts transitioned from economic and urbanization factors to a multifaceted interplay of natural and social determinants, underscoring the growing intricacy of spatial dynamics. These findings offer crucial insights into the mechanisms driving PLES conflicts, guiding urban planners and policymakers in developing strategies to balance competing land-use priorities. By quantifying conflicts and identifying key drivers, this study helps prioritize interventions that mitigate tensions between production, living, and ecological spaces, supporting policies that reconcile urban expansion with ecological preservation for sustainable development in urban fringe areas.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/7/3483PLESspatial tensionsurban fringe areasspatial–temporal evolutionoptimal parameter geographic detector
spellingShingle Ziqing Feng
Shaoqiu Long
Yilun Liu
Spatial Conflicts in ‘Production, Living, and Ecological Space’ Functions at Urban Fringes: The Case of Zengcheng, Guangzhou
Applied Sciences
PLES
spatial tensions
urban fringe areas
spatial–temporal evolution
optimal parameter geographic detector
title Spatial Conflicts in ‘Production, Living, and Ecological Space’ Functions at Urban Fringes: The Case of Zengcheng, Guangzhou
title_full Spatial Conflicts in ‘Production, Living, and Ecological Space’ Functions at Urban Fringes: The Case of Zengcheng, Guangzhou
title_fullStr Spatial Conflicts in ‘Production, Living, and Ecological Space’ Functions at Urban Fringes: The Case of Zengcheng, Guangzhou
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Conflicts in ‘Production, Living, and Ecological Space’ Functions at Urban Fringes: The Case of Zengcheng, Guangzhou
title_short Spatial Conflicts in ‘Production, Living, and Ecological Space’ Functions at Urban Fringes: The Case of Zengcheng, Guangzhou
title_sort spatial conflicts in production living and ecological space functions at urban fringes the case of zengcheng guangzhou
topic PLES
spatial tensions
urban fringe areas
spatial–temporal evolution
optimal parameter geographic detector
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/7/3483
work_keys_str_mv AT ziqingfeng spatialconflictsinproductionlivingandecologicalspacefunctionsaturbanfringesthecaseofzengchengguangzhou
AT shaoqiulong spatialconflictsinproductionlivingandecologicalspacefunctionsaturbanfringesthecaseofzengchengguangzhou
AT yilunliu spatialconflictsinproductionlivingandecologicalspacefunctionsaturbanfringesthecaseofzengchengguangzhou