Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
<h4>Background</h4>Systematic reviews (SRs) can help decision makers interpret the deluge of published biomedical literature. However, a SR may be of limited use if the methods used to conduct the SR are flawed, and reporting of the SR is incomplete. To our knowledge, since 2004 there ha...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Matthew J Page, Larissa Shamseer, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Margaret Sampson, Andrea C Tricco, Ferrán Catalá-López, Lun Li, Emma K Reid, Rafael Sarkis-Onofre, David Moher |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-05-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Medicine |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
by: David Moher, et al.
Published: (2009-07-01) -
Four Proposals to Help Improve the Medical Research Literature.
by: David Moher, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
The quality of reporting methods and results in network meta-analyses: an overview of reviews and suggestions for improvement.
by: Brian Hutton, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Disseminating biomedical research: Predatory journals and practices
by: Hassan Khan, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Efectividad y coste-efectividad de intervenciones no farmacológicas para trastornos somáticos funcionales: revisión sistemática de metaanálisis y evaluaciones económicas
by: Inmaculada Boluda-Verdú, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)