“Violent rhetoric” and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in American electoral discourse

The article is devoted to “violent rhetoric” as a type of oratory practice used in the genre of political debates and is based on the material from the 2024 U. S. electoral campaign. The data were collected from speeches of American politicians, their statements in the media and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leontovich, Olga Arkadyevna
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Saratov State University 2025-05-01
Series:Жанры речи
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zhanry-rechi.sgu.ru/en/system/files/pdf-full-version/2025/05/speechgenres_2025_2-118-127.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849694043613691904
author Leontovich, Olga Arkadyevna
author_facet Leontovich, Olga Arkadyevna
author_sort Leontovich, Olga Arkadyevna
collection DOAJ
description The article is devoted to “violent rhetoric” as a type of oratory practice used in the genre of political debates and is based on the material from the 2024 U. S. electoral campaign. The data were collected from speeches of American politicians, their statements in the media and on Twitter, as well as from Russian and foreign publications and TV news broadcasts from January 2023 to August 2024. The research methods include rhetorical analysis, critical discourse analysis, semiotic and contextual analyses. The article examines the characteristics of American presidential rhetoric, such as simplicity of speech, semantic vagueness of key concepts, a small amount of factual information, a high degree of pathos and aggressiveness, and the use of simplistic humor. The main features of “violent rhetoric” identified in the course of the research are the use of confrontational strategies, fierce attacks on opponents, as well as war and aggression metaphors. The study also shows that the central focus is on issues of political correctness, which are directly related to the main contradictions between Democrats and Republicans. “Violent rhetoric” creates social tension, leads to the radicalization of political views, and poses the risk of real physical violence. 
format Article
id doaj-art-0d0bf16d22aa4c18b26e3918dd85c7a2
institution DOAJ
issn 2311-0740
2311-0759
language Russian
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Saratov State University
record_format Article
series Жанры речи
spelling doaj-art-0d0bf16d22aa4c18b26e3918dd85c7a22025-08-20T03:20:13ZrusSaratov State UniversityЖанры речи2311-07402311-07592025-05-0120211812710.18500/2311-0740-2025-20-2-46-118-127“Violent rhetoric” and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in American electoral discourseLeontovich, Olga Arkadyevna0Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University, 27 V. I. Lenin Ave., Volgograd, 400066, RussiaThe article is devoted to “violent rhetoric” as a type of oratory practice used in the genre of political debates and is based on the material from the 2024 U. S. electoral campaign. The data were collected from speeches of American politicians, their statements in the media and on Twitter, as well as from Russian and foreign publications and TV news broadcasts from January 2023 to August 2024. The research methods include rhetorical analysis, critical discourse analysis, semiotic and contextual analyses. The article examines the characteristics of American presidential rhetoric, such as simplicity of speech, semantic vagueness of key concepts, a small amount of factual information, a high degree of pathos and aggressiveness, and the use of simplistic humor. The main features of “violent rhetoric” identified in the course of the research are the use of confrontational strategies, fierce attacks on opponents, as well as war and aggression metaphors. The study also shows that the central focus is on issues of political correctness, which are directly related to the main contradictions between Democrats and Republicans. “Violent rhetoric” creates social tension, leads to the radicalization of political views, and poses the risk of real physical violence. https://zhanry-rechi.sgu.ru/en/system/files/pdf-full-version/2025/05/speechgenres_2025_2-118-127.pdfgenre of electoral political debates“violent rhetoric”political correctnessamerican electoral discourseconfrontational strategieswar and aggression metaphorsverbal threats
spellingShingle Leontovich, Olga Arkadyevna
“Violent rhetoric” and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in American electoral discourse
Жанры речи
genre of electoral political debates
“violent rhetoric”
political correctness
american electoral discourse
confrontational strategies
war and aggression metaphors
verbal threats
title “Violent rhetoric” and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in American electoral discourse
title_full “Violent rhetoric” and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in American electoral discourse
title_fullStr “Violent rhetoric” and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in American electoral discourse
title_full_unstemmed “Violent rhetoric” and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in American electoral discourse
title_short “Violent rhetoric” and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in American electoral discourse
title_sort violent rhetoric and political correctness in the genre of electoral political debates in american electoral discourse
topic genre of electoral political debates
“violent rhetoric”
political correctness
american electoral discourse
confrontational strategies
war and aggression metaphors
verbal threats
url https://zhanry-rechi.sgu.ru/en/system/files/pdf-full-version/2025/05/speechgenres_2025_2-118-127.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT leontovicholgaarkadyevna violentrhetoricandpoliticalcorrectnessinthegenreofelectoralpoliticaldebatesinamericanelectoraldiscourse