Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock
Abstract Aims Despite advances in coronary reperfusion and percutaneous mechanical circulatory support, mortality among patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unacceptably high. Clinical trials and risk stratification tools have largely focused on acute CS, particularly secondary to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Tara L. Jones, Michael C. Tan, Vidang Nguyen, Kathleen E. Kearney, Charles C. Maynard, Emily Anderson, Claudius Mahr, James M. McCabe |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | ESC Heart Failure |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12670 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with cardiogenic shock
by: Dingfeng Fang, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Combined Risk Stratification With Patient Characteristics and Biomarkers in Patients Treated With the Impella for Cardiogenic Shock
by: Yuichi Saito, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Protocol‐Driven Best Practices and Cardiogenic Shock Survival in Asian Patients
by: Calvin Leung, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Cardiogenic shock — the current state of the problem
by: S. A. Boytsov, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction
by: A. Yu. Serdechnaya, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)