Efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study

ObjectiveThis study aims to (1) determine the prevalence of malnutrition among hospitalized children with congenital heart disease (CHD), (2) evaluate the effectiveness of common pediatric nutritional screening tools across various age groups, and (3) specifically assess the tools’ efficacy in ident...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying Xu, Yingying Jiang, Minzhi Guo, Yiping Wang, Hongmiao Huang, Jiaqian Xie, Dongshan Liao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1572805/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849426787178643456
author Ying Xu
Yingying Jiang
Minzhi Guo
Yiping Wang
Hongmiao Huang
Jiaqian Xie
Dongshan Liao
Dongshan Liao
author_facet Ying Xu
Yingying Jiang
Minzhi Guo
Yiping Wang
Hongmiao Huang
Jiaqian Xie
Dongshan Liao
Dongshan Liao
author_sort Ying Xu
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveThis study aims to (1) determine the prevalence of malnutrition among hospitalized children with congenital heart disease (CHD), (2) evaluate the effectiveness of common pediatric nutritional screening tools across various age groups, and (3) specifically assess the tools’ efficacy in identifying severe malnutrition, thereby facilitating early nutritional intervention.MethodsA retrospective observational analysis was performed using clinical data from 3,677 children (0–18 years) with congenital heart disease who underwent surgical intervention at the Cardiothoracic Surgery Center between January 2018 and December 2022. The World Health Organization growth curves were used as standards to compare the efficacy of four screening tools: Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP), Screening Tool Risk on Nutritional status and Growth (STRONGkids), Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery-1 method (RACHS-1), and the combined STAMP + STRONGkids (SS) adjusted score across different age groups. Categorical data were expressed as percentages, and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis, with pairwise comparisons performed using Bonferroni correction. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to calculate specificity, sensitivity, and optimal cutoff values. The consistency of screening results was further assessed using Youden’s index and Kappa values.ResultsThe prevalence of malnutrition among CHD patients was 32.9% (1,208/3,667). Using World Health Organization (WHO) curves as the gold standard for diagnosing malnutrition, the AUC for the ROC curves of STAMP, STRONGkids, and SS were 0.841, 0.747, and 0.863 (P < 0.01), respectively, for nutritional risk screening among CHD patients. Optimal Youden indices were achieved at a STAMP score of 3.5 (55.9%), a STRONGkids score of 2.5 (41.5%), and an SS score of 3.25 (64.5%). Age-based subgroup analysis revealed that STAMP had the best sensitivity of 70.1% (Negative Prediction Rate (NPV) 96.1) at a score of 3.5 for children aged 6–18 years, STRONGkids showed optimal sensitivity of 78.1% (NPV 77.3) at a score of 2.5 for infants aged 0–1 year, and SS demonstrated 74.7% sensitivity (NPV 96.6) at a score of 3.25 for children aged 6–18 years. Further analysis indicated that STAMP at a score of 2.5 and SS at a score of 2.75 showed balanced sensitivity and specificity across all age groups. Additionally, for different degrees of nutritional deficiencies, STAMP at 3.5 and SS at 3.25 demonstrated ideal specificity, with all Kappa values being P < 0.001.ConclusionFor hospitalized CHD patients aged 0–18 years, the nutritional screening tool STAMP is more effective than STRONGkids, and SS combines the advantages of both tools as it demonstrates the best screening efficacy. However, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the RACHS-1 score was 0.525 (P >0.01), indicating not suitable for nutritional risk screening. To enhance sensitivity in screening malnutrition in CHD patients, the recommended cutoff values are 3 for STAMP and 2.5 for SS. For identifying severe malnutrition, STAMP at a cutoff of 3.5 and SS at 3.25 show higher overall screening efficacy.
format Article
id doaj-art-0cc0597838ea4422b9d5d6d8dc263f03
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-861X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Nutrition
spelling doaj-art-0cc0597838ea4422b9d5d6d8dc263f032025-08-20T03:29:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2025-06-011210.3389/fnut.2025.15728051572805Efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational studyYing Xu0Yingying Jiang1Minzhi Guo2Yiping Wang3Hongmiao Huang4Jiaqian Xie5Dongshan Liao6Dongshan Liao7Department of Clinical Nutrition, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Occupational Health, Fujian Center for Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases and Chemical poisoning, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Center for Cardiovascular Medicine, Fuzhou, ChinaObjectiveThis study aims to (1) determine the prevalence of malnutrition among hospitalized children with congenital heart disease (CHD), (2) evaluate the effectiveness of common pediatric nutritional screening tools across various age groups, and (3) specifically assess the tools’ efficacy in identifying severe malnutrition, thereby facilitating early nutritional intervention.MethodsA retrospective observational analysis was performed using clinical data from 3,677 children (0–18 years) with congenital heart disease who underwent surgical intervention at the Cardiothoracic Surgery Center between January 2018 and December 2022. The World Health Organization growth curves were used as standards to compare the efficacy of four screening tools: Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP), Screening Tool Risk on Nutritional status and Growth (STRONGkids), Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery-1 method (RACHS-1), and the combined STAMP + STRONGkids (SS) adjusted score across different age groups. Categorical data were expressed as percentages, and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis, with pairwise comparisons performed using Bonferroni correction. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to calculate specificity, sensitivity, and optimal cutoff values. The consistency of screening results was further assessed using Youden’s index and Kappa values.ResultsThe prevalence of malnutrition among CHD patients was 32.9% (1,208/3,667). Using World Health Organization (WHO) curves as the gold standard for diagnosing malnutrition, the AUC for the ROC curves of STAMP, STRONGkids, and SS were 0.841, 0.747, and 0.863 (P < 0.01), respectively, for nutritional risk screening among CHD patients. Optimal Youden indices were achieved at a STAMP score of 3.5 (55.9%), a STRONGkids score of 2.5 (41.5%), and an SS score of 3.25 (64.5%). Age-based subgroup analysis revealed that STAMP had the best sensitivity of 70.1% (Negative Prediction Rate (NPV) 96.1) at a score of 3.5 for children aged 6–18 years, STRONGkids showed optimal sensitivity of 78.1% (NPV 77.3) at a score of 2.5 for infants aged 0–1 year, and SS demonstrated 74.7% sensitivity (NPV 96.6) at a score of 3.25 for children aged 6–18 years. Further analysis indicated that STAMP at a score of 2.5 and SS at a score of 2.75 showed balanced sensitivity and specificity across all age groups. Additionally, for different degrees of nutritional deficiencies, STAMP at 3.5 and SS at 3.25 demonstrated ideal specificity, with all Kappa values being P < 0.001.ConclusionFor hospitalized CHD patients aged 0–18 years, the nutritional screening tool STAMP is more effective than STRONGkids, and SS combines the advantages of both tools as it demonstrates the best screening efficacy. However, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the RACHS-1 score was 0.525 (P >0.01), indicating not suitable for nutritional risk screening. To enhance sensitivity in screening malnutrition in CHD patients, the recommended cutoff values are 3 for STAMP and 2.5 for SS. For identifying severe malnutrition, STAMP at a cutoff of 3.5 and SS at 3.25 show higher overall screening efficacy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1572805/fullcongenital heart diseasenutritional screeningmalnutritionSTAMPSTRONGkids
spellingShingle Ying Xu
Yingying Jiang
Minzhi Guo
Yiping Wang
Hongmiao Huang
Jiaqian Xie
Dongshan Liao
Dongshan Liao
Efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study
Frontiers in Nutrition
congenital heart disease
nutritional screening
malnutrition
STAMP
STRONGkids
title Efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study
title_full Efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study
title_short Efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study
title_sort efficiency analysis of nutritional screening tools for children with congenital heart disease a retrospective observational study
topic congenital heart disease
nutritional screening
malnutrition
STAMP
STRONGkids
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1572805/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yingxu efficiencyanalysisofnutritionalscreeningtoolsforchildrenwithcongenitalheartdiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yingyingjiang efficiencyanalysisofnutritionalscreeningtoolsforchildrenwithcongenitalheartdiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT minzhiguo efficiencyanalysisofnutritionalscreeningtoolsforchildrenwithcongenitalheartdiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yipingwang efficiencyanalysisofnutritionalscreeningtoolsforchildrenwithcongenitalheartdiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hongmiaohuang efficiencyanalysisofnutritionalscreeningtoolsforchildrenwithcongenitalheartdiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jiaqianxie efficiencyanalysisofnutritionalscreeningtoolsforchildrenwithcongenitalheartdiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dongshanliao efficiencyanalysisofnutritionalscreeningtoolsforchildrenwithcongenitalheartdiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dongshanliao efficiencyanalysisofnutritionalscreeningtoolsforchildrenwithcongenitalheartdiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy