Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes

Abstract Monitoring perioperative tissue perfusion is crucial in clinical anesthesia to protect organs and ensure patient safety. Indicators like hemodynamic parameters, tissue metabolism, and microcirculation markers are used for assessment. Studies show intraoperative hypotension negatively impact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bin Li, Yuchen Dai, Wenlan Cai, Menghan Sun, Jie Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03353-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571283345244160
author Bin Li
Yuchen Dai
Wenlan Cai
Menghan Sun
Jie Sun
author_facet Bin Li
Yuchen Dai
Wenlan Cai
Menghan Sun
Jie Sun
author_sort Bin Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Monitoring perioperative tissue perfusion is crucial in clinical anesthesia to protect organs and ensure patient safety. Indicators like hemodynamic parameters, tissue metabolism, and microcirculation markers are used for assessment. Studies show intraoperative hypotension negatively impacts outcomes, though blood pressure alone may not reflect tissue perfusion accurately. Cardiac output is a more direct measure, with adequate levels generally indicating good perfusion. However, some conditions cause adequate cardiac output but inadequate perfusion. Non-quantitative markers like skin color and temperature, and quantitative indicators like tissue oxygen saturation and laser Doppler flowmetry, help assess microcirculation but can’t fully evaluate systemic perfusion. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) monitors tissue oxygen metabolism, reflecting oxygen supply and consumption balance. Central venous oxygen saturation offers a better systemic overview but may not always indicate good perfusion, especially in sepsis. Lactic acid levels closely correlate with tissue perfusion and outcomes, with dynamic changes being more indicative than single measurements. Effective monitoring requires evaluating both macro- and microcirculation states and systemic metabolic levels to ensure optimal outcomes. Combining these measures provides a more accurate assessment of tissue perfusion and patient prognosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-0c348adcb8bc40d5b64a12abac704e14
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-8090
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj-art-0c348adcb8bc40d5b64a12abac704e142025-02-02T12:42:13ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902025-01-012011810.1186/s13019-025-03353-6Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomesBin Li0Yuchen Dai1Wenlan Cai2Menghan Sun3Jie Sun4Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongda hospital, Southeast UniversitySoutheast University School of MedicineSoutheast University School of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongda hospital, Southeast UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongda hospital, Southeast UniversityAbstract Monitoring perioperative tissue perfusion is crucial in clinical anesthesia to protect organs and ensure patient safety. Indicators like hemodynamic parameters, tissue metabolism, and microcirculation markers are used for assessment. Studies show intraoperative hypotension negatively impacts outcomes, though blood pressure alone may not reflect tissue perfusion accurately. Cardiac output is a more direct measure, with adequate levels generally indicating good perfusion. However, some conditions cause adequate cardiac output but inadequate perfusion. Non-quantitative markers like skin color and temperature, and quantitative indicators like tissue oxygen saturation and laser Doppler flowmetry, help assess microcirculation but can’t fully evaluate systemic perfusion. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) monitors tissue oxygen metabolism, reflecting oxygen supply and consumption balance. Central venous oxygen saturation offers a better systemic overview but may not always indicate good perfusion, especially in sepsis. Lactic acid levels closely correlate with tissue perfusion and outcomes, with dynamic changes being more indicative than single measurements. Effective monitoring requires evaluating both macro- and microcirculation states and systemic metabolic levels to ensure optimal outcomes. Combining these measures provides a more accurate assessment of tissue perfusion and patient prognosis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03353-6PerioperativeTissue perfusion monitoringHemodynamicMetabolic indicatorsPatient outcomes
spellingShingle Bin Li
Yuchen Dai
Wenlan Cai
Menghan Sun
Jie Sun
Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Perioperative
Tissue perfusion monitoring
Hemodynamic
Metabolic indicators
Patient outcomes
title Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes
title_full Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes
title_fullStr Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes
title_short Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes
title_sort monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes
topic Perioperative
Tissue perfusion monitoring
Hemodynamic
Metabolic indicators
Patient outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03353-6
work_keys_str_mv AT binli monitoringofperioperativetissueperfusionandimpactonpatientoutcomes
AT yuchendai monitoringofperioperativetissueperfusionandimpactonpatientoutcomes
AT wenlancai monitoringofperioperativetissueperfusionandimpactonpatientoutcomes
AT menghansun monitoringofperioperativetissueperfusionandimpactonpatientoutcomes
AT jiesun monitoringofperioperativetissueperfusionandimpactonpatientoutcomes