Judging prosecutors: Public support for prosecutorial discretion
Prosecutors have immense discretion to determine which offenses to charge, which cases to take to trial, and which sentences to recommend. Yet, even though many of the prosecutors who exercise this discretion over important crimes must face the electorate to keep their jobs, we know little about how...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Michael J. Nelson, Taran Samarth |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Research & Politics |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680221134999 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Prosecutorial councils and guarantees of prosecutors autonomy in Western Balkans states
by: Matić-Bošković Marina
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Women as Judges and Public Prosecutors in Austria: A Historical Overview
by: Gabriele Schneider
Published: (2010-12-01) -
Women as Judges and Public Prosecutors in Austria: A Historical Overview
by: Gabriele Schneider
Published: (2010-12-01) -
Prosecutorial investigation: Pros and cons
by: Živković Natalija
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Postwar Convictions of Nazi Judges and Prosecutors for Their Activities in the Occupied Polish Territories (1939 – 1945)
by: Konrad Graczyk
Published: (2024-06-01)