322 Use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community–academic partnerships

Objectives/Goals: Audience will understand the engage for equity CBPR conceptual framework used to develop our partnership survey. Audience will better understand our survey design and administration process. Audience will understand our initial experiences, community advisory board member responses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Krist, Emily Zimmerman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124009543/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850097766385057792
author Alex Krist
Emily Zimmerman
author_facet Alex Krist
Emily Zimmerman
author_sort Alex Krist
collection DOAJ
description Objectives/Goals: Audience will understand the engage for equity CBPR conceptual framework used to develop our partnership survey. Audience will better understand our survey design and administration process. Audience will understand our initial experiences, community advisory board member responses, and how the process influenced our engagement efforts. Methods/Study Population: The objective of this assessment is to understand how our community partners perceive our engagement efforts. The questionnaire is based on the 12 constructs of the CBPR engage for equity model. We plan on annually assessing impact and refining engagement approaches in response to community partners’ perspectives. Community Advisory Board members and other partners will complete an online survey and participate in a subsequent discussion and planning session about the responses. We anticipate evaluating approximately 400 community partners who collaborate with the Wright Regional Clinical and Translational Science Awards between 2023 and 2030 with a RedCAP survey and discussion. The instrument uses validated questions from a range of engagement instruments to assess context, partnership structure, processes, outputs, and outcomes. Results/Anticipated Results: We hypothesize that both the survey and subsequent discussion about how respondents reacted to answering the questions will improve our ability to track and adapt our community engagement efforts. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Our annual survey is not project specific and using it longitudinally will inform our engagement process to research that aligns with community needs. We anticipate this will help us to guide our research agenda to align with community needs and define impact of our university–community partnership.
format Article
id doaj-art-0c25946b3e614a3280236bd99cbdf891
institution DOAJ
issn 2059-8661
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj-art-0c25946b3e614a3280236bd99cbdf8912025-08-20T02:40:52ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612025-04-019999910.1017/cts.2024.954322 Use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community–academic partnershipsAlex Krist0Emily Zimmerman1Virginia Commonwealth UniversityVirginia Commonwealth UniversityObjectives/Goals: Audience will understand the engage for equity CBPR conceptual framework used to develop our partnership survey. Audience will better understand our survey design and administration process. Audience will understand our initial experiences, community advisory board member responses, and how the process influenced our engagement efforts. Methods/Study Population: The objective of this assessment is to understand how our community partners perceive our engagement efforts. The questionnaire is based on the 12 constructs of the CBPR engage for equity model. We plan on annually assessing impact and refining engagement approaches in response to community partners’ perspectives. Community Advisory Board members and other partners will complete an online survey and participate in a subsequent discussion and planning session about the responses. We anticipate evaluating approximately 400 community partners who collaborate with the Wright Regional Clinical and Translational Science Awards between 2023 and 2030 with a RedCAP survey and discussion. The instrument uses validated questions from a range of engagement instruments to assess context, partnership structure, processes, outputs, and outcomes. Results/Anticipated Results: We hypothesize that both the survey and subsequent discussion about how respondents reacted to answering the questions will improve our ability to track and adapt our community engagement efforts. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Our annual survey is not project specific and using it longitudinally will inform our engagement process to research that aligns with community needs. We anticipate this will help us to guide our research agenda to align with community needs and define impact of our university–community partnership.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124009543/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Alex Krist
Emily Zimmerman
322 Use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community–academic partnerships
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 322 Use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community–academic partnerships
title_full 322 Use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community–academic partnerships
title_fullStr 322 Use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community–academic partnerships
title_full_unstemmed 322 Use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community–academic partnerships
title_short 322 Use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community–academic partnerships
title_sort 322 use of the engage for equity framework to longitudinally assess community academic partnerships
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124009543/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT alexkrist 322useoftheengageforequityframeworktolongitudinallyassesscommunityacademicpartnerships
AT emilyzimmerman 322useoftheengageforequityframeworktolongitudinallyassesscommunityacademicpartnerships