Rethinking methane from animal agriculture

Abstract Background As the global community actively works to keep temperatures from rising beyond 1.5 °C, predicting greenhouse gases (GHGs) by how they warm the planet—and not their carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalence—provides information critical to developing short- and long-term climate solutions....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shule Liu, Joe Proudman, Frank M. Mitloehner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CABI 2021-06-01
Series:CABI Agriculture and Bioscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-021-00041-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832573808331980800
author Shule Liu
Joe Proudman
Frank M. Mitloehner
author_facet Shule Liu
Joe Proudman
Frank M. Mitloehner
author_sort Shule Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background As the global community actively works to keep temperatures from rising beyond 1.5 °C, predicting greenhouse gases (GHGs) by how they warm the planet—and not their carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalence—provides information critical to developing short- and long-term climate solutions. Livestock, and in particular cattle, have been broadly branded as major emitters of methane (CH4) and significant drivers of climate change. Livestock production has been growing to meet the global food demand, however, increasing demand for production does not necessarily result in the proportional increase of CH4 production. The present paper intends to evaluate the actual effects of the CH4 emission from U.S. dairy and beef production on temperature and initiate a rethinking of CH4 associated with animal agriculture to clarify long-standing misunderstandings and uncover the potential role of animal agriculture in fighting climate change. Methods Two climate metrics, the standard 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP100) and the recently proposed Global Warming Potential Star (GWP*), were applied to the CH4 emission from the U.S. cattle industry to assess and compare its climate contribution. Results Using GWP*, the projected climate impacts show that CH4 emissions from the U.S. cattle industry have not contributed additional warming since 1986. Calculations show that the California dairy industry will approach climate neutrality in the next ten years if CH4 emissions can be reduced by 1% per year, with the possibility to induce cooling if there are further reductions of emissions. Conclusions GWP* should be used in combination with GWP to provide feasible strategies on fighting climate change induced by short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs). By continuously improving production efficiency and management practices, animal agriculture can be a short-term solution to fight climate warming that the global community can leverage while developing long-term solutions for fossil fuel carbon emissions.
format Article
id doaj-art-0bebb2e90d2044fea3021bca6f9ce4db
institution Kabale University
issn 2662-4044
language English
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher CABI
record_format Article
series CABI Agriculture and Bioscience
spelling doaj-art-0bebb2e90d2044fea3021bca6f9ce4db2025-02-02T02:36:31ZengCABICABI Agriculture and Bioscience2662-40442021-06-012111310.1186/s43170-021-00041-yRethinking methane from animal agricultureShule Liu0Joe Proudman1Frank M. Mitloehner2CLEAR Center, Department of Animal Science, University of CaliforniaCLEAR Center, Department of Animal Science, University of CaliforniaCLEAR Center, Department of Animal Science, University of CaliforniaAbstract Background As the global community actively works to keep temperatures from rising beyond 1.5 °C, predicting greenhouse gases (GHGs) by how they warm the planet—and not their carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalence—provides information critical to developing short- and long-term climate solutions. Livestock, and in particular cattle, have been broadly branded as major emitters of methane (CH4) and significant drivers of climate change. Livestock production has been growing to meet the global food demand, however, increasing demand for production does not necessarily result in the proportional increase of CH4 production. The present paper intends to evaluate the actual effects of the CH4 emission from U.S. dairy and beef production on temperature and initiate a rethinking of CH4 associated with animal agriculture to clarify long-standing misunderstandings and uncover the potential role of animal agriculture in fighting climate change. Methods Two climate metrics, the standard 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP100) and the recently proposed Global Warming Potential Star (GWP*), were applied to the CH4 emission from the U.S. cattle industry to assess and compare its climate contribution. Results Using GWP*, the projected climate impacts show that CH4 emissions from the U.S. cattle industry have not contributed additional warming since 1986. Calculations show that the California dairy industry will approach climate neutrality in the next ten years if CH4 emissions can be reduced by 1% per year, with the possibility to induce cooling if there are further reductions of emissions. Conclusions GWP* should be used in combination with GWP to provide feasible strategies on fighting climate change induced by short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs). By continuously improving production efficiency and management practices, animal agriculture can be a short-term solution to fight climate warming that the global community can leverage while developing long-term solutions for fossil fuel carbon emissions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-021-00041-yMethaneShort-lived climate pollutantGreenhouse gasLivestockCattleGlobal warming potential
spellingShingle Shule Liu
Joe Proudman
Frank M. Mitloehner
Rethinking methane from animal agriculture
CABI Agriculture and Bioscience
Methane
Short-lived climate pollutant
Greenhouse gas
Livestock
Cattle
Global warming potential
title Rethinking methane from animal agriculture
title_full Rethinking methane from animal agriculture
title_fullStr Rethinking methane from animal agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking methane from animal agriculture
title_short Rethinking methane from animal agriculture
title_sort rethinking methane from animal agriculture
topic Methane
Short-lived climate pollutant
Greenhouse gas
Livestock
Cattle
Global warming potential
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-021-00041-y
work_keys_str_mv AT shuleliu rethinkingmethanefromanimalagriculture
AT joeproudman rethinkingmethanefromanimalagriculture
AT frankmmitloehner rethinkingmethanefromanimalagriculture