Emergency physician use of end‐tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation

Abstract Background End‐tidal oxygen (ETO2) monitoring is used by anesthesiologists to quantify the efficacy of preoxygenation before intubation but is generally not used in emergency departments (EDs). We have previously published our findings describing preoxygenation practices in the ED during bl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew Oliver, Nicholas D. Caputo, Jason R. West, Robert Hackett, John C. Sakles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12260
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849727243107958784
author Matthew Oliver
Nicholas D. Caputo
Jason R. West
Robert Hackett
John C. Sakles
author_facet Matthew Oliver
Nicholas D. Caputo
Jason R. West
Robert Hackett
John C. Sakles
author_sort Matthew Oliver
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background End‐tidal oxygen (ETO2) monitoring is used by anesthesiologists to quantify the efficacy of preoxygenation before intubation but is generally not used in emergency departments (EDs). We have previously published our findings describing preoxygenation practices in the ED during blinded use of ETO2. The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether the unblinded use of ETO2 monitoring led to improvements in preoxygenation during rapid sequence intubation in the ED and also the oxygen device or technique changes that were used to achieve higher ETO2 levels. Methods We conducted an interventional study at 2 academic EDs in Sydney, Australia and New York City, New York using ETO2 monitoring to investigate the preoxygenation process and effectiveness. We used data collected during a previous descriptive study for the control group, in which care teams in the same 2 EDs were blinded to the ETO2 value. In the study group, clinicians could utilize ETO2 to improve preoxygenation. Following an education process, clinicians were able to choose the method of preoxygenation and the techniques required to attempt to achieve an ETO2 level >85%. The primary outcome was the difference in ETO2 levels at the time of induction between the control and study group and the secondary outcome included the methods that were attempted to improve preoxygenation. Results A convenience sample of 100 patients was enrolled in each group. The median ETO2 level achieved at the time of induction was 80% (interquartile range 61 to 86, overall range 73) in the control group and 90% in the study group (interquartile range 83 to 92, overall range 41); the median difference was 12 (95% confidence interval: 8, 16, P = < 0.001). The majority of oxygen device changes were from non‐rebreather mask to bag‐valve‐mask (BVM) (15%, n = 15) and changes in technique from improvements in mask seal (54%, n = 34). The final device used in the study group was BVM in 87% of cases. Conclusions In 2 clinical studies of ETO2 in academic EDs, we have demonstrated that the use of ETO2 is feasible and associated with specific and potentially improved approaches to preoxygenation. A clinical trial is needed to further study the impact of ETO2 on the preoxygenation process and the rate of hypoxemia.
format Article
id doaj-art-0bd4b7d6576a4907b1cc23e7e2c476fd
institution DOAJ
issn 2688-1152
language English
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
spelling doaj-art-0bd4b7d6576a4907b1cc23e7e2c476fd2025-08-20T03:09:55ZengElsevierJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2688-11522020-10-011570671310.1002/emp2.12260Emergency physician use of end‐tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubationMatthew Oliver0Nicholas D. Caputo1Jason R. West2Robert Hackett3John C. Sakles4Department of Emergency Medicine Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney AustraliaDepartment of Emergency Medicine Lincoln Medical Center Bronx New York USADepartment of Emergency Medicine Lincoln Medical Center Bronx New York USADepartment of Anaesthesia Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney AustraliaDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Arizona College of Medicine Arizona Tucson USAAbstract Background End‐tidal oxygen (ETO2) monitoring is used by anesthesiologists to quantify the efficacy of preoxygenation before intubation but is generally not used in emergency departments (EDs). We have previously published our findings describing preoxygenation practices in the ED during blinded use of ETO2. The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether the unblinded use of ETO2 monitoring led to improvements in preoxygenation during rapid sequence intubation in the ED and also the oxygen device or technique changes that were used to achieve higher ETO2 levels. Methods We conducted an interventional study at 2 academic EDs in Sydney, Australia and New York City, New York using ETO2 monitoring to investigate the preoxygenation process and effectiveness. We used data collected during a previous descriptive study for the control group, in which care teams in the same 2 EDs were blinded to the ETO2 value. In the study group, clinicians could utilize ETO2 to improve preoxygenation. Following an education process, clinicians were able to choose the method of preoxygenation and the techniques required to attempt to achieve an ETO2 level >85%. The primary outcome was the difference in ETO2 levels at the time of induction between the control and study group and the secondary outcome included the methods that were attempted to improve preoxygenation. Results A convenience sample of 100 patients was enrolled in each group. The median ETO2 level achieved at the time of induction was 80% (interquartile range 61 to 86, overall range 73) in the control group and 90% in the study group (interquartile range 83 to 92, overall range 41); the median difference was 12 (95% confidence interval: 8, 16, P = < 0.001). The majority of oxygen device changes were from non‐rebreather mask to bag‐valve‐mask (BVM) (15%, n = 15) and changes in technique from improvements in mask seal (54%, n = 34). The final device used in the study group was BVM in 87% of cases. Conclusions In 2 clinical studies of ETO2 in academic EDs, we have demonstrated that the use of ETO2 is feasible and associated with specific and potentially improved approaches to preoxygenation. A clinical trial is needed to further study the impact of ETO2 on the preoxygenation process and the rate of hypoxemia.https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12260AirwayEmergencyIntubationPreoxygenationResuscitation
spellingShingle Matthew Oliver
Nicholas D. Caputo
Jason R. West
Robert Hackett
John C. Sakles
Emergency physician use of end‐tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Airway
Emergency
Intubation
Preoxygenation
Resuscitation
title Emergency physician use of end‐tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation
title_full Emergency physician use of end‐tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation
title_fullStr Emergency physician use of end‐tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation
title_full_unstemmed Emergency physician use of end‐tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation
title_short Emergency physician use of end‐tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation
title_sort emergency physician use of end tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation
topic Airway
Emergency
Intubation
Preoxygenation
Resuscitation
url https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12260
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewoliver emergencyphysicianuseofendtidaloxygenmonitoringforrapidsequenceintubation
AT nicholasdcaputo emergencyphysicianuseofendtidaloxygenmonitoringforrapidsequenceintubation
AT jasonrwest emergencyphysicianuseofendtidaloxygenmonitoringforrapidsequenceintubation
AT roberthackett emergencyphysicianuseofendtidaloxygenmonitoringforrapidsequenceintubation
AT johncsakles emergencyphysicianuseofendtidaloxygenmonitoringforrapidsequenceintubation