TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical Evidence

Over the past two years, evidence has emerged that the currently available thiazolidinediones (TZDs), rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone have negative skeletal consequences, at least in women, which are clinically important. Increased fracture risk in women, but not men, was reported for both TZDs, ba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ann V. Schwartz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008-01-01
Series:PPAR Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/297893
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552823416422400
author Ann V. Schwartz
author_facet Ann V. Schwartz
author_sort Ann V. Schwartz
collection DOAJ
description Over the past two years, evidence has emerged that the currently available thiazolidinediones (TZDs), rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone have negative skeletal consequences, at least in women, which are clinically important. Increased fracture risk in women, but not men, was reported for both TZDs, based on analyses of adverse event reports from clinical trials. In short-term clinical trials in women, both TZDs caused more rapid bone loss. In these trials, changes in bone turnover markers suggest a pattern of reduced bone formation without a change in resorption. Although limited, these results support the hypothesis based on rodent and in vitro models that reduced bone formation resulting from activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-𝛾 (PPAR𝛾) is a central mechanism for TZDs_ effect on bone. Research is needed to better understand the mechanisms of bone loss with TZDs, to identify factors that influence susceptibility to TZD-induced osteoporosis, and to test treatments for its prevention.
format Article
id doaj-art-0bc76deeab704735af03ed1529542a2c
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-4757
1687-4765
language English
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series PPAR Research
spelling doaj-art-0bc76deeab704735af03ed1529542a2c2025-02-03T05:57:34ZengWileyPPAR Research1687-47571687-47652008-01-01200810.1155/2008/297893297893TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical EvidenceAnn V. Schwartz0Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 5700, San Francisco, CA 94107, USAOver the past two years, evidence has emerged that the currently available thiazolidinediones (TZDs), rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone have negative skeletal consequences, at least in women, which are clinically important. Increased fracture risk in women, but not men, was reported for both TZDs, based on analyses of adverse event reports from clinical trials. In short-term clinical trials in women, both TZDs caused more rapid bone loss. In these trials, changes in bone turnover markers suggest a pattern of reduced bone formation without a change in resorption. Although limited, these results support the hypothesis based on rodent and in vitro models that reduced bone formation resulting from activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-𝛾 (PPAR𝛾) is a central mechanism for TZDs_ effect on bone. Research is needed to better understand the mechanisms of bone loss with TZDs, to identify factors that influence susceptibility to TZD-induced osteoporosis, and to test treatments for its prevention.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/297893
spellingShingle Ann V. Schwartz
TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical Evidence
PPAR Research
title TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical Evidence
title_full TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical Evidence
title_fullStr TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical Evidence
title_full_unstemmed TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical Evidence
title_short TZDs and Bone: A Review of the Recent Clinical Evidence
title_sort tzds and bone a review of the recent clinical evidence
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/297893
work_keys_str_mv AT annvschwartz tzdsandboneareviewoftherecentclinicalevidence