Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study

Objectives To study the effect of an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on perinatal outcomes.Design A retrospective cohort study with difference-in-differences analysis using individual-level perinatal outcome data from the Dutch Perinatal Registry 2003–2014 linked to C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Burdorf, Jasper V Been, Hendrik CC de Jonge, Jacqueline Lagendijk, Unnati Saha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/10/e031357.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850259986922340352
author Alex Burdorf
Jasper V Been
Hendrik CC de Jonge
Jacqueline Lagendijk
Unnati Saha
author_facet Alex Burdorf
Jasper V Been
Hendrik CC de Jonge
Jacqueline Lagendijk
Unnati Saha
author_sort Alex Burdorf
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To study the effect of an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on perinatal outcomes.Design A retrospective cohort study with difference-in-differences analysis using individual-level perinatal outcome data from the Dutch Perinatal Registry 2003–2014 linked to Central Bureau of Statistics data of migration background and individual disposable household income.Intervention The programme consisted of perinatal health promotion, risk selection and risk-guided pregnancy care, and a new primary care child birth centre. The programme was implemented during 2009–2012.Primary outcome measures We compared trends in perinatal mortality, preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age births between targeted urban neighbourhoods in Rotterdam (n=61 415) and all other urban neighbourhoods in the Netherlands (n=881 202). The effect of the programme was modelled as a change in trend of each perinatal outcome in the treatment group post intervention compared with the control population from January 2010 onwards. All analyses were adjusted for maternal age, parity, ethnicity and individual-level low socioeconomic status (SES). We also conducted a stratified analysis by SES.Results During 2003–2014, downward trends in perinatal mortality (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.9439 per year, 95% CI 0.9362 to 0.9517), preterm birth (aOR 0.9970 per year, 95% CI 0.9944 to 0.9997) and small-for-gestational-age births (aOR 0.9809 per year, 95% CI 0.9787 to 0.9831) in the entire study population were observed. No demonstrable changes in these trends were found in the intervention group after the programme had started. The stratified analyses by SES showed no changes in trends post intervention in both strata either.Conclusions The programme had no demonstrable effects on perinatal outcomes. The intervention may not have reached a sufficient proportion of the population or has provided too little contrast to the widespread attention for inequalities in pregnancy outcomes occurring simultaneously in the Netherlands.
format Article
id doaj-art-0bc4f59232d14891a26dbadd186b87db
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-0bc4f59232d14891a26dbadd186b87db2025-08-20T01:55:45ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-10-0191010.1136/bmjopen-2019-031357Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort studyAlex Burdorf0Jasper V Been1Hendrik CC de Jonge2Jacqueline Lagendijk3Unnati Saha41 Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsObjectives To study the effect of an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on perinatal outcomes.Design A retrospective cohort study with difference-in-differences analysis using individual-level perinatal outcome data from the Dutch Perinatal Registry 2003–2014 linked to Central Bureau of Statistics data of migration background and individual disposable household income.Intervention The programme consisted of perinatal health promotion, risk selection and risk-guided pregnancy care, and a new primary care child birth centre. The programme was implemented during 2009–2012.Primary outcome measures We compared trends in perinatal mortality, preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age births between targeted urban neighbourhoods in Rotterdam (n=61 415) and all other urban neighbourhoods in the Netherlands (n=881 202). The effect of the programme was modelled as a change in trend of each perinatal outcome in the treatment group post intervention compared with the control population from January 2010 onwards. All analyses were adjusted for maternal age, parity, ethnicity and individual-level low socioeconomic status (SES). We also conducted a stratified analysis by SES.Results During 2003–2014, downward trends in perinatal mortality (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.9439 per year, 95% CI 0.9362 to 0.9517), preterm birth (aOR 0.9970 per year, 95% CI 0.9944 to 0.9997) and small-for-gestational-age births (aOR 0.9809 per year, 95% CI 0.9787 to 0.9831) in the entire study population were observed. No demonstrable changes in these trends were found in the intervention group after the programme had started. The stratified analyses by SES showed no changes in trends post intervention in both strata either.Conclusions The programme had no demonstrable effects on perinatal outcomes. The intervention may not have reached a sufficient proportion of the population or has provided too little contrast to the widespread attention for inequalities in pregnancy outcomes occurring simultaneously in the Netherlands.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/10/e031357.full
spellingShingle Alex Burdorf
Jasper V Been
Hendrik CC de Jonge
Jacqueline Lagendijk
Unnati Saha
Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study
BMJ Open
title Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study
title_full Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study
title_short Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study
title_sort did an urban perinatal health programme in rotterdam the netherlands reduce adverse perinatal outcomes register based retrospective cohort study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/10/e031357.full
work_keys_str_mv AT alexburdorf didanurbanperinatalhealthprogrammeinrotterdamthenetherlandsreduceadverseperinataloutcomesregisterbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jaspervbeen didanurbanperinatalhealthprogrammeinrotterdamthenetherlandsreduceadverseperinataloutcomesregisterbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hendrikccdejonge didanurbanperinatalhealthprogrammeinrotterdamthenetherlandsreduceadverseperinataloutcomesregisterbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jacquelinelagendijk didanurbanperinatalhealthprogrammeinrotterdamthenetherlandsreduceadverseperinataloutcomesregisterbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT unnatisaha didanurbanperinatalhealthprogrammeinrotterdamthenetherlandsreduceadverseperinataloutcomesregisterbasedretrospectivecohortstudy