Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas
This study provides a multidimensional analysis of sustainable socio-economic development and its challenges in the rural areas of Ukraine. The methodology of realization of sustainable development’s conceptual provisions was created. The advantages of using indicative assessment at the regional lev...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
GJESM Publisher
2020-04-01
|
| Series: | Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.gjesm.net/article_37320_252b7cd6e0abd606f0b65673d9159d64.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832570940203991040 |
|---|---|
| author | V. Shcherbak L. Ganushchak-Yefimenko O. Nifatova N. Fastovets G. Plysenko L. Lutay V. Tkachuk O. Ptashchenko |
| author_facet | V. Shcherbak L. Ganushchak-Yefimenko O. Nifatova N. Fastovets G. Plysenko L. Lutay V. Tkachuk O. Ptashchenko |
| author_sort | V. Shcherbak |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study provides a multidimensional analysis of sustainable socio-economic development and its challenges in the rural areas of Ukraine. The methodology of realization of sustainable development’s conceptual provisions was created. The advantages of using indicative assessment at the regional level were justified. The methodical approach how to define the indicators of sustainable development (including economic, socio-demographic, labor and environmental domains) of rural areas was proposed. Statistical data, experts’ and rural residents’ evaluation were used to assess the level of socio-economic development of rural areas. The proposed system of indicators is applicable not only to the rural areas of the whole region, but also to its different parts. The tracking model is based on the consistent use of economic, mathematical and expert methods: SWOT-analysis, factor, cluster and discriminant analysis. The construction of the dendrogram allows to determine the type of representative for each cluster. The modeling of sustainable socio-economic development for each sample is applicable to all areas within same cluster. A representative sample from each cluster makes it possible to identify the presence in the region of the so-called "points of growth" and to forecast their development. Two scenarios are considered: maximum (the share of GRP accumulation growth 21.2%) and moderate (the share of GRP accumulation growth 10.6%). <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">GDP</span> Gross Domestic Product growth will differentiate by the type of activity: cluster 1 (agriculture, hunting and forestry) 13% increase; cluster 2 (trade, service and household services) 21% increase; cluster 3 (tourism and international cooperation) 18% increase; cluster 4 (processing industry) 8% increase. Therefore, the using of key indicators for monitoring the sustainable development of rural areas provides an opportunity to take into account the specifics of sustainable development of different specialization branches of rural areas that will support high economic and social growth in the future. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0bb4d0faefe34cdda14fa8f4a7247785 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-3572 2383-3866 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
| publisher | GJESM Publisher |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management |
| spelling | doaj-art-0bb4d0faefe34cdda14fa8f4a72477852025-02-02T13:27:28ZengGJESM PublisherGlobal Journal of Environmental Science and Management2383-35722383-38662020-04-016217519010.22034/gjesm.2020.02.0437320Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areasV. Shcherbak0L. Ganushchak-Yefimenko1O. Nifatova2N. Fastovets3G. Plysenko4L. Lutay5V. Tkachuk6O. Ptashchenko7Department of Entrepreneurship and Business, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, UkraineDepartment of Entrepreneurship and Business, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, UkraineDepartment of Entrepreneurship and Business, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, UkraineDepartment of Private and Public Law, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, UkraineProblematic Research Laboratory of Institutional Support for the Public Employment Service and Partnership with Employers, Ukrainian State Employment Service Training Institute, Kyiv, UkraineDepartment of Management, Ukrainian State Employment Service Training Institute, Kyiv, UkraineScientific and Pedagogical Work, International Activity and Development, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineDepartment of Marketing and Corporate Communications, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, UkraineThis study provides a multidimensional analysis of sustainable socio-economic development and its challenges in the rural areas of Ukraine. The methodology of realization of sustainable development’s conceptual provisions was created. The advantages of using indicative assessment at the regional level were justified. The methodical approach how to define the indicators of sustainable development (including economic, socio-demographic, labor and environmental domains) of rural areas was proposed. Statistical data, experts’ and rural residents’ evaluation were used to assess the level of socio-economic development of rural areas. The proposed system of indicators is applicable not only to the rural areas of the whole region, but also to its different parts. The tracking model is based on the consistent use of economic, mathematical and expert methods: SWOT-analysis, factor, cluster and discriminant analysis. The construction of the dendrogram allows to determine the type of representative for each cluster. The modeling of sustainable socio-economic development for each sample is applicable to all areas within same cluster. A representative sample from each cluster makes it possible to identify the presence in the region of the so-called "points of growth" and to forecast their development. Two scenarios are considered: maximum (the share of GRP accumulation growth 21.2%) and moderate (the share of GRP accumulation growth 10.6%). <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">GDP</span> Gross Domestic Product growth will differentiate by the type of activity: cluster 1 (agriculture, hunting and forestry) 13% increase; cluster 2 (trade, service and household services) 21% increase; cluster 3 (tourism and international cooperation) 18% increase; cluster 4 (processing industry) 8% increase. Therefore, the using of key indicators for monitoring the sustainable development of rural areas provides an opportunity to take into account the specifics of sustainable development of different specialization branches of rural areas that will support high economic and social growth in the future.https://www.gjesm.net/article_37320_252b7cd6e0abd606f0b65673d9159d64.pdfindicatorsmonitoringrural areassocio-economic developmentsustainability |
| spellingShingle | V. Shcherbak L. Ganushchak-Yefimenko O. Nifatova N. Fastovets G. Plysenko L. Lutay V. Tkachuk O. Ptashchenko Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management indicators monitoring rural areas socio-economic development sustainability |
| title | Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas |
| title_full | Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas |
| title_fullStr | Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas |
| title_full_unstemmed | Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas |
| title_short | Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas |
| title_sort | use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas |
| topic | indicators monitoring rural areas socio-economic development sustainability |
| url | https://www.gjesm.net/article_37320_252b7cd6e0abd606f0b65673d9159d64.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vshcherbak useofkeyindicatorstomonitorsustainabledevelopmentofruralareas AT lganushchakyefimenko useofkeyindicatorstomonitorsustainabledevelopmentofruralareas AT onifatova useofkeyindicatorstomonitorsustainabledevelopmentofruralareas AT nfastovets useofkeyindicatorstomonitorsustainabledevelopmentofruralareas AT gplysenko useofkeyindicatorstomonitorsustainabledevelopmentofruralareas AT llutay useofkeyindicatorstomonitorsustainabledevelopmentofruralareas AT vtkachuk useofkeyindicatorstomonitorsustainabledevelopmentofruralareas AT optashchenko useofkeyindicatorstomonitorsustainabledevelopmentofruralareas |