Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial

Objective To compare the efficacy of Food and Drug Administration recommended dosing of nicardipine versus labetalol for the management of hypertensive patients with signs and/or symptoms (S/S) suggestive of end-organ damage (EOD).Design Secondary analysis of the multicentre prospective, randomised...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian Hiestand, Phillip Levy, W Frank Peacock, Brigitte M Baumann, Richard M Nowak, Amy Hsu, Joseph Varon, Chad M Cannon, David M Cline, Pierre Borczuk, Abhinav Chandra, Deborah B Diercks, Preeti Jois, Brian Kaminski, Jon W Schrock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2013-03-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/3/e002338.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858170766819328
author Brian Hiestand
Phillip Levy
W Frank Peacock
Brigitte M Baumann
Richard M Nowak
Amy Hsu
Joseph Varon
Chad M Cannon
David M Cline
Pierre Borczuk
Abhinav Chandra
Deborah B Diercks
Preeti Jois
Brian Kaminski
Jon W Schrock
author_facet Brian Hiestand
Phillip Levy
W Frank Peacock
Brigitte M Baumann
Richard M Nowak
Amy Hsu
Joseph Varon
Chad M Cannon
David M Cline
Pierre Borczuk
Abhinav Chandra
Deborah B Diercks
Preeti Jois
Brian Kaminski
Jon W Schrock
author_sort Brian Hiestand
collection DOAJ
description Objective To compare the efficacy of Food and Drug Administration recommended dosing of nicardipine versus labetalol for the management of hypertensive patients with signs and/or symptoms (S/S) suggestive of end-organ damage (EOD).Design Secondary analysis of the multicentre prospective, randomised CLUE trial.Setting 13 academic emergency departments in the USA.Participants Eligible patients had two systolic blood pressure (SBP) measures ≥180 mm Hg at least 10 min apart, no contraindications to nicardipine or labetalol and predefined S/S suggestive of EOD on arrival.Interventions Medications were administered by continuous infusion (nicardipine) or repeat intravenous bolus (labetalol) for a study period of 30 min or until a specified target SBP ±20 mm Hg was achieved.Primary outcome measure Percentage of participants achieving a predefined target SBP range (TR) defined as an SBP within ±20 mm Hg as established by the treating physician.Results Of the 141 eligible patients, 49.6% received nicardipine, 51.7% were women and 81.6% were black. Mean age was 52.2±13.9 years. Median initial SBP did not differ in the nicardipine (210.5 (IQR 197–226) mm Hg) and labetalol (210 (200–226) mm Hg) groups (p=0.862). Nicardipine patients were more likely to have a history of diabetes (41.4% vs 25.7%, p=0.05) but there were no other historical, demographic or laboratory differences between groups. Within 30 min, nicardipine patients more often reached the target SBP range than those receiving labetalol (91.4% vs 76.1%, difference=15.3% (95% CI 3.5% to 27.3%); p=0.01). On multivariable modelling with adjustment for gender and clinical site, nicardipine patients were more likely to be in TR by 30 min than patients receiving labetalol (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 10.18, C statistic=0.72).Conclusions In the setting of hypertension with suspected EOD, patients treated with nicardipine are more likely to reach prespecified SBP targets within 30 min than patients receiving labetalol.Clinical Trial Registration NCT00765648, clinicaltrials.gov
format Article
id doaj-art-0ba3c7be21074136bf2490284dd715b4
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-0ba3c7be21074136bf2490284dd715b42025-02-11T13:00:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552013-03-013310.1136/bmjopen-2012-002338Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trialBrian Hiestand0Phillip Levy1W Frank Peacock2Brigitte M Baumann3Richard M Nowak4Amy Hsu5Joseph Varon6Chad M Cannon7David M Cline8Pierre Borczuk9Abhinav Chandra10Deborah B Diercks11Preeti Jois12Brian Kaminski13Jon W Schrock14Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine and Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA11 Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USADivision of Clinical Research, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USABruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Medicine and Acute and Continuing Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USADivision of Emergency Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USAEmergency Medicine, Toledo Hospital, Toledo, Ohio, USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USAObjective To compare the efficacy of Food and Drug Administration recommended dosing of nicardipine versus labetalol for the management of hypertensive patients with signs and/or symptoms (S/S) suggestive of end-organ damage (EOD).Design Secondary analysis of the multicentre prospective, randomised CLUE trial.Setting 13 academic emergency departments in the USA.Participants Eligible patients had two systolic blood pressure (SBP) measures ≥180 mm Hg at least 10 min apart, no contraindications to nicardipine or labetalol and predefined S/S suggestive of EOD on arrival.Interventions Medications were administered by continuous infusion (nicardipine) or repeat intravenous bolus (labetalol) for a study period of 30 min or until a specified target SBP ±20 mm Hg was achieved.Primary outcome measure Percentage of participants achieving a predefined target SBP range (TR) defined as an SBP within ±20 mm Hg as established by the treating physician.Results Of the 141 eligible patients, 49.6% received nicardipine, 51.7% were women and 81.6% were black. Mean age was 52.2±13.9 years. Median initial SBP did not differ in the nicardipine (210.5 (IQR 197–226) mm Hg) and labetalol (210 (200–226) mm Hg) groups (p=0.862). Nicardipine patients were more likely to have a history of diabetes (41.4% vs 25.7%, p=0.05) but there were no other historical, demographic or laboratory differences between groups. Within 30 min, nicardipine patients more often reached the target SBP range than those receiving labetalol (91.4% vs 76.1%, difference=15.3% (95% CI 3.5% to 27.3%); p=0.01). On multivariable modelling with adjustment for gender and clinical site, nicardipine patients were more likely to be in TR by 30 min than patients receiving labetalol (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 10.18, C statistic=0.72).Conclusions In the setting of hypertension with suspected EOD, patients treated with nicardipine are more likely to reach prespecified SBP targets within 30 min than patients receiving labetalol.Clinical Trial Registration NCT00765648, clinicaltrials.govhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/3/e002338.full
spellingShingle Brian Hiestand
Phillip Levy
W Frank Peacock
Brigitte M Baumann
Richard M Nowak
Amy Hsu
Joseph Varon
Chad M Cannon
David M Cline
Pierre Borczuk
Abhinav Chandra
Deborah B Diercks
Preeti Jois
Brian Kaminski
Jon W Schrock
Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial
BMJ Open
title Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial
title_full Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial
title_fullStr Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial
title_short Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial
title_sort intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end organ damage in the emergency department a subgroup analysis of the clue trial
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/3/e002338.full
work_keys_str_mv AT brianhiestand intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT philliplevy intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT wfrankpeacock intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT brigittembaumann intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT richardmnowak intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT amyhsu intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT josephvaron intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT chadmcannon intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT davidmcline intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT pierreborczuk intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT abhinavchandra intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT deborahbdiercks intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT preetijois intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT briankaminski intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial
AT jonwschrock intravenousnicardipineandlabetaloluseinhypertensivepatientswithsignsorsymptomssuggestiveofendorgandamageintheemergencydepartmentasubgroupanalysisofthecluetrial