Assessing the well-being of PhD scholars: a scoping review

Abstract Background Gaining insight into the well-being of PhD scholars is essential for cultivating a nurturing academic environment that boosts their efficiency and adds to the overall excellence of higher education. Our scoping review aimed to comprehensively map and analyse the current body of l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naheed Mahsood, Usman Mahboob, Muhammad Asim, Neelofar Shaheen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02668-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850184295996456960
author Naheed Mahsood
Usman Mahboob
Muhammad Asim
Neelofar Shaheen
author_facet Naheed Mahsood
Usman Mahboob
Muhammad Asim
Neelofar Shaheen
author_sort Naheed Mahsood
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Gaining insight into the well-being of PhD scholars is essential for cultivating a nurturing academic environment that boosts their efficiency and adds to the overall excellence of higher education. Our scoping review aimed to comprehensively map and analyse the current body of literature on the well-being of PhD scholars, identify important themes and gaps, and offer valuable insights for future studies and interventions to improve the overall well-being of PhD scholars. Methods We conducted a scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis–Scoping Review extension as per the Joanna Briggs Institute Protocol guidelines. A systematic search was performed across search engines and databases, including Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL Ultimate, and Web of Science. The data were retrieved from inception to May 2024. All identified records were gathered and imported into the Covidence Software for screening, removing duplication, and final selection by the review team. The socio-ecological framework was used as a theoretical framework to analyse the data thematically. Results The search across five databases resulted in the identification of 3,391 records, supplemented by an additional 25 records from Google Scholar as grey literature. Following the application of the eligibility criteria and thorough deliberation by the review team, 63 records were included in the review. Inductive thematic analysis systematically identified a conceptual framework encompassing the description of PhD scholars’ well-being. The results revealed a comprehensive understanding of the concept of the well-being of PhD scholars, identifying themes at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels. Conclusion The scoping review highlighted the complex, diverse, and multifaceted nature of PhD scholars’ well-being, emphasising the need for comprehensive and tailored interventions at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels to enhance their overall well-being.
format Article
id doaj-art-0b5fa33fa61e49bdaa050fe4d7ad157e
institution OA Journals
issn 2050-7283
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj-art-0b5fa33fa61e49bdaa050fe4d7ad157e2025-08-20T02:17:05ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832025-04-0113113610.1186/s40359-025-02668-2Assessing the well-being of PhD scholars: a scoping reviewNaheed Mahsood0Usman Mahboob1Muhammad Asim2Neelofar Shaheen3Department of Medical Education, Khyber Girls Medical CollegeInstitute of Health Professions Education and Research, Khyber Medical UniversityInstitute of Public Health and Social Sciences, Khyber Medical UniversityDepartment of Health Professions Education and Research, Peshawar Medical College, Riphah International UniversityAbstract Background Gaining insight into the well-being of PhD scholars is essential for cultivating a nurturing academic environment that boosts their efficiency and adds to the overall excellence of higher education. Our scoping review aimed to comprehensively map and analyse the current body of literature on the well-being of PhD scholars, identify important themes and gaps, and offer valuable insights for future studies and interventions to improve the overall well-being of PhD scholars. Methods We conducted a scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis–Scoping Review extension as per the Joanna Briggs Institute Protocol guidelines. A systematic search was performed across search engines and databases, including Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL Ultimate, and Web of Science. The data were retrieved from inception to May 2024. All identified records were gathered and imported into the Covidence Software for screening, removing duplication, and final selection by the review team. The socio-ecological framework was used as a theoretical framework to analyse the data thematically. Results The search across five databases resulted in the identification of 3,391 records, supplemented by an additional 25 records from Google Scholar as grey literature. Following the application of the eligibility criteria and thorough deliberation by the review team, 63 records were included in the review. Inductive thematic analysis systematically identified a conceptual framework encompassing the description of PhD scholars’ well-being. The results revealed a comprehensive understanding of the concept of the well-being of PhD scholars, identifying themes at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels. Conclusion The scoping review highlighted the complex, diverse, and multifaceted nature of PhD scholars’ well-being, emphasising the need for comprehensive and tailored interventions at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels to enhance their overall well-being.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02668-2PhD ScholarsWell-beingMental HealthAcademic EnvironmentScoping ReviewSocio-ecological Framework
spellingShingle Naheed Mahsood
Usman Mahboob
Muhammad Asim
Neelofar Shaheen
Assessing the well-being of PhD scholars: a scoping review
BMC Psychology
PhD Scholars
Well-being
Mental Health
Academic Environment
Scoping Review
Socio-ecological Framework
title Assessing the well-being of PhD scholars: a scoping review
title_full Assessing the well-being of PhD scholars: a scoping review
title_fullStr Assessing the well-being of PhD scholars: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the well-being of PhD scholars: a scoping review
title_short Assessing the well-being of PhD scholars: a scoping review
title_sort assessing the well being of phd scholars a scoping review
topic PhD Scholars
Well-being
Mental Health
Academic Environment
Scoping Review
Socio-ecological Framework
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02668-2
work_keys_str_mv AT naheedmahsood assessingthewellbeingofphdscholarsascopingreview
AT usmanmahboob assessingthewellbeingofphdscholarsascopingreview
AT muhammadasim assessingthewellbeingofphdscholarsascopingreview
AT neelofarshaheen assessingthewellbeingofphdscholarsascopingreview