Comparison of Mobile Transaction Security Using NFC and QR Codes

Mobile device transactions have become commonplace today. Quick-response (QR) codes and near-field communication (NFC) are popular cashless and contactless payment methods. These two payments have their characteristics. NFC payments use secure elements that encrypt credential data to ensure safe tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucia Nugraheni Harnaningrum, Kristoforus Nanda Mahardhian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2024-11-01
Series:Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JNTETI/article/view/12867
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850033157384962048
author Lucia Nugraheni Harnaningrum
Kristoforus Nanda Mahardhian
author_facet Lucia Nugraheni Harnaningrum
Kristoforus Nanda Mahardhian
author_sort Lucia Nugraheni Harnaningrum
collection DOAJ
description Mobile device transactions have become commonplace today. Quick-response (QR) codes and near-field communication (NFC) are popular cashless and contactless payment methods. These two payments have their characteristics. NFC payments use secure elements that encrypt credential data to ensure safe transactions. In contrast, QR code payments transmit data in its original form without encryption. Existing data are sent between devices in the form of original data. Given the extensive adoption of these methods, it is imperative to secure transaction data to prevent theft and misuse. It is necessary to know and compare the security level of each transaction and provide the best recommendations. This study undertook a comparative analysis of the security and performance of NFC and QR code-based mobile payment models. The study found that NFC transactions required 1,074 ms for encryption, while QR code transactions took 5.9359 ms. The entropy value, indicating data randomness, was 3.96 for NFC and 3.23 for QR codes. The P value, representing statistical significance, was 0.45 for NFC and 0.069 for QR codes. Both payment methods demonstrated acceptable levels of safety, with processing times and data randomness within satisfactory ranges. However, the analysis concludes that NFC transactions offer superior performance in terms of processing time and data security compared to QR code transactions.
format Article
id doaj-art-0b4013bec07b4f9fa7f54a7de7537f51
institution DOAJ
issn 2301-4156
2460-5719
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format Article
series Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi
spelling doaj-art-0b4013bec07b4f9fa7f54a7de7537f512025-08-20T02:58:19ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaJurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi2301-41562460-57192024-11-0113426527110.22146/jnteti.v13i4.1286712867Comparison of Mobile Transaction Security Using NFC and QR CodesLucia Nugraheni Harnaningrum0Kristoforus Nanda Mahardhian1Informatics Study Program, Faculty of Information Technology, Indonesia Digital Technology University, Bantul, D.I. Yogyakarta 55198, IndonesiaInformatics Study Program, Faculty of Information Technology, Indonesia Digital Technology University, Bantul, D.I. Yogyakarta 55198, IndonesiaMobile device transactions have become commonplace today. Quick-response (QR) codes and near-field communication (NFC) are popular cashless and contactless payment methods. These two payments have their characteristics. NFC payments use secure elements that encrypt credential data to ensure safe transactions. In contrast, QR code payments transmit data in its original form without encryption. Existing data are sent between devices in the form of original data. Given the extensive adoption of these methods, it is imperative to secure transaction data to prevent theft and misuse. It is necessary to know and compare the security level of each transaction and provide the best recommendations. This study undertook a comparative analysis of the security and performance of NFC and QR code-based mobile payment models. The study found that NFC transactions required 1,074 ms for encryption, while QR code transactions took 5.9359 ms. The entropy value, indicating data randomness, was 3.96 for NFC and 3.23 for QR codes. The P value, representing statistical significance, was 0.45 for NFC and 0.069 for QR codes. Both payment methods demonstrated acceptable levels of safety, with processing times and data randomness within satisfactory ranges. However, the analysis concludes that NFC transactions offer superior performance in terms of processing time and data security compared to QR code transactions.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JNTETI/article/view/12867nfcqrsecure elementencryptiondata randomness
spellingShingle Lucia Nugraheni Harnaningrum
Kristoforus Nanda Mahardhian
Comparison of Mobile Transaction Security Using NFC and QR Codes
Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi
nfc
qr
secure element
encryption
data randomness
title Comparison of Mobile Transaction Security Using NFC and QR Codes
title_full Comparison of Mobile Transaction Security Using NFC and QR Codes
title_fullStr Comparison of Mobile Transaction Security Using NFC and QR Codes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Mobile Transaction Security Using NFC and QR Codes
title_short Comparison of Mobile Transaction Security Using NFC and QR Codes
title_sort comparison of mobile transaction security using nfc and qr codes
topic nfc
qr
secure element
encryption
data randomness
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JNTETI/article/view/12867
work_keys_str_mv AT lucianugraheniharnaningrum comparisonofmobiletransactionsecurityusingnfcandqrcodes
AT kristoforusnandamahardhian comparisonofmobiletransactionsecurityusingnfcandqrcodes