Maritime networks as a vector for early farming/language dispersals: A comparative review

Maritime networks have been proposed as a mechanism for early agricultural and, by extension, language dispersals in several coastal and island regions. In Island Southeast Asia, such networks have sometimes been discussed as an alternative to the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. However, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Hudson, Junzo Uchiyama, Claudia Zancan, Katarina Šukelj, Renata Cabral Bernabé, Rasmus G. Bjørn, Ilona R. Bausch, Irene M. Muñoz Fernández
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Quaternary Environments and Humans
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000106
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850113991567736832
author Mark Hudson
Junzo Uchiyama
Claudia Zancan
Katarina Šukelj
Renata Cabral Bernabé
Rasmus G. Bjørn
Ilona R. Bausch
Irene M. Muñoz Fernández
author_facet Mark Hudson
Junzo Uchiyama
Claudia Zancan
Katarina Šukelj
Renata Cabral Bernabé
Rasmus G. Bjørn
Ilona R. Bausch
Irene M. Muñoz Fernández
author_sort Mark Hudson
collection DOAJ
description Maritime networks have been proposed as a mechanism for early agricultural and, by extension, language dispersals in several coastal and island regions. In Island Southeast Asia, such networks have sometimes been discussed as an alternative to the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. However, the relationships between Neolithic maritime networks and maritime economies are poorly known. Here, we summarise published information for three regions where Neolithic maritime networks are thought to have been associated with language dispersals (whether hypothetical or directly attested): the Mediterranean, Island Southeast Asia and Japan. We conclude that while maritime networks played an important role in the Neolithic dispersals considered here, maritime trade and resources did not necessarily represent alternative or opposing economic strategies to agriculture. It was only from the Bronze Age that long-distance trade integrated maritime exchange and resources into a broader economic system. Our review illustrates the complex relations between subsistence, technology and mobility in prehistoric maritime networks and the paper concludes with suggestions for future research.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a9dee325ce4456b8d4fd34b710cd986
institution OA Journals
issn 2950-2365
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Quaternary Environments and Humans
spelling doaj-art-0a9dee325ce4456b8d4fd34b710cd9862025-08-20T02:37:01ZengElsevierQuaternary Environments and Humans2950-23652025-06-013210006610.1016/j.qeh.2025.100066Maritime networks as a vector for early farming/language dispersals: A comparative reviewMark Hudson0Junzo Uchiyama1Claudia Zancan2Katarina Šukelj3Renata Cabral Bernabé4Rasmus G. Bjørn5Ilona R. Bausch6Irene M. Muñoz Fernández7Language and the Anthropocene Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Kahlaische straße 10, Jena 07445, Germany; Institut d’Asie Orientale, ENS de Lyon, 15 parvis René Descartes, BP 7000, Lyon 69342, France; Corresponding author at: Language and the Anthropocene Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Kahlaische straße 10, Jena 07445, Germany.Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University, Helgonavägen 3, LUX - Hus A, Lund 223 62, Sweden; Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures, 64 The Close, Norwich NR1 4DH, United Kingdom; Institute for the Study of Ancient Civilizations and Cultural Resources, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa 920-1192, JapanDepartment of Asian and North African Studies, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, San Sebastiano, Dorsoduro 1686, Venice 30123, ItalyDepartment of Asian Studies, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia; Department of Asian Studies, Faculty of Arts, Ljubljana University, Aškerčeva 2, Ljubljana 1000, SloveniaDepartment of History, European University Institute, Villa Salviati, Via Bolognese 156, Florence 50139, ItalyLanguage and the Anthropocene Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Kahlaische straße 10, Jena 07445, Germany; Department for Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 136 and Emil Holms Kanal 2, Copenhagen S DK-2300, DenmarkSainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures, 64 The Close, Norwich NR1 4DH, United Kingdom; Centre for Asian and Transcultural Studies, Institute of East Asian Art History, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, Heidelberg 69115, Germany; Leiden Institute for Area Studies (LIAS), Leiden University, Witte Singel 27a, 2311 BX Leiden, NetherlandsÁrea de Estudios de Asia Oriental, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid 28040, SpainMaritime networks have been proposed as a mechanism for early agricultural and, by extension, language dispersals in several coastal and island regions. In Island Southeast Asia, such networks have sometimes been discussed as an alternative to the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. However, the relationships between Neolithic maritime networks and maritime economies are poorly known. Here, we summarise published information for three regions where Neolithic maritime networks are thought to have been associated with language dispersals (whether hypothetical or directly attested): the Mediterranean, Island Southeast Asia and Japan. We conclude that while maritime networks played an important role in the Neolithic dispersals considered here, maritime trade and resources did not necessarily represent alternative or opposing economic strategies to agriculture. It was only from the Bronze Age that long-distance trade integrated maritime exchange and resources into a broader economic system. Our review illustrates the complex relations between subsistence, technology and mobility in prehistoric maritime networks and the paper concludes with suggestions for future research.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000106Trading networksFishingPrehistoric seafaringLanguage shiftNeolithic
spellingShingle Mark Hudson
Junzo Uchiyama
Claudia Zancan
Katarina Šukelj
Renata Cabral Bernabé
Rasmus G. Bjørn
Ilona R. Bausch
Irene M. Muñoz Fernández
Maritime networks as a vector for early farming/language dispersals: A comparative review
Quaternary Environments and Humans
Trading networks
Fishing
Prehistoric seafaring
Language shift
Neolithic
title Maritime networks as a vector for early farming/language dispersals: A comparative review
title_full Maritime networks as a vector for early farming/language dispersals: A comparative review
title_fullStr Maritime networks as a vector for early farming/language dispersals: A comparative review
title_full_unstemmed Maritime networks as a vector for early farming/language dispersals: A comparative review
title_short Maritime networks as a vector for early farming/language dispersals: A comparative review
title_sort maritime networks as a vector for early farming language dispersals a comparative review
topic Trading networks
Fishing
Prehistoric seafaring
Language shift
Neolithic
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000106
work_keys_str_mv AT markhudson maritimenetworksasavectorforearlyfarminglanguagedispersalsacomparativereview
AT junzouchiyama maritimenetworksasavectorforearlyfarminglanguagedispersalsacomparativereview
AT claudiazancan maritimenetworksasavectorforearlyfarminglanguagedispersalsacomparativereview
AT katarinasukelj maritimenetworksasavectorforearlyfarminglanguagedispersalsacomparativereview
AT renatacabralbernabe maritimenetworksasavectorforearlyfarminglanguagedispersalsacomparativereview
AT rasmusgbjørn maritimenetworksasavectorforearlyfarminglanguagedispersalsacomparativereview
AT ilonarbausch maritimenetworksasavectorforearlyfarminglanguagedispersalsacomparativereview
AT irenemmunozfernandez maritimenetworksasavectorforearlyfarminglanguagedispersalsacomparativereview