Advances in Aircraft Skin Defect Detection Using Computer Vision: A Survey and Comparison of YOLOv9 and RT-DETR Performance

Aircraft skin surface defect detection is critical for aviation safety but is currently mostly reliant on manual or visual inspections. Recent advancements in computer vision offer opportunities for automation. This paper reviews the current state of computer vision algorithms and their application...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nutchanon Suvittawat, Christian Kurniawan, Jetanat Datephanyawat, Jordan Tay, Zhihao Liu, De Wen Soh, Nuno Antunes Ribeiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/4/356
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849712267522736128
author Nutchanon Suvittawat
Christian Kurniawan
Jetanat Datephanyawat
Jordan Tay
Zhihao Liu
De Wen Soh
Nuno Antunes Ribeiro
author_facet Nutchanon Suvittawat
Christian Kurniawan
Jetanat Datephanyawat
Jordan Tay
Zhihao Liu
De Wen Soh
Nuno Antunes Ribeiro
author_sort Nutchanon Suvittawat
collection DOAJ
description Aircraft skin surface defect detection is critical for aviation safety but is currently mostly reliant on manual or visual inspections. Recent advancements in computer vision offer opportunities for automation. This paper reviews the current state of computer vision algorithms and their application in aircraft defect detection, synthesizing insights from academic research (21 publications) and industry projects (18 initiatives). Beyond a detailed review, we experimentally evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of existing low-cost, easily deployable hardware (drone) and software solutions (computer vision algorithms). Specifically, real-world data were collected from an abandoned aircraft with visible defects using a drone to capture video footage, which was then processed with state-of-the-art computer vision models—YOLOv9 and RT-DETR. Both models achieved mAP50 scores of 0.70–0.75, with YOLOv9 demonstrating slightly better accuracy and inference speed, while RT-DETR exhibited faster training convergence. Additionally, a comparison between YOLOv5 and YOLOv9 revealed a 10% improvement in mAP50, highlighting the rapid advancements in computer vision in recent years. Lastly, we identify and discuss various alternative hardware solutions for data collection—in addition to drones, these include robotic platforms, climbing robots, and smart hangars—and discuss key challenges for their deployment, such as regulatory constraints, human–robot integration, and weather resilience. The fundamental contribution of this paper is to underscore the potential of computer vision for aircraft skin defect detection while emphasizing that further research is still required to address existing limitations.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a5aad2fc9264dae95a1f82c72ec0284
institution DOAJ
issn 2226-4310
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Aerospace
spelling doaj-art-0a5aad2fc9264dae95a1f82c72ec02842025-08-20T03:14:20ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102025-04-0112435610.3390/aerospace12040356Advances in Aircraft Skin Defect Detection Using Computer Vision: A Survey and Comparison of YOLOv9 and RT-DETR PerformanceNutchanon Suvittawat0Christian Kurniawan1Jetanat Datephanyawat2Jordan Tay3Zhihao Liu4De Wen Soh5Nuno Antunes Ribeiro6Information Systems Technology and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, SingaporeInformation Systems Technology and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, SingaporeEngineering Systems and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, SingaporeAviation Studies Institute, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, SingaporeEngineering Systems and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, SingaporeInformation Systems Technology and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, SingaporeEngineering Systems and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, SingaporeAircraft skin surface defect detection is critical for aviation safety but is currently mostly reliant on manual or visual inspections. Recent advancements in computer vision offer opportunities for automation. This paper reviews the current state of computer vision algorithms and their application in aircraft defect detection, synthesizing insights from academic research (21 publications) and industry projects (18 initiatives). Beyond a detailed review, we experimentally evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of existing low-cost, easily deployable hardware (drone) and software solutions (computer vision algorithms). Specifically, real-world data were collected from an abandoned aircraft with visible defects using a drone to capture video footage, which was then processed with state-of-the-art computer vision models—YOLOv9 and RT-DETR. Both models achieved mAP50 scores of 0.70–0.75, with YOLOv9 demonstrating slightly better accuracy and inference speed, while RT-DETR exhibited faster training convergence. Additionally, a comparison between YOLOv5 and YOLOv9 revealed a 10% improvement in mAP50, highlighting the rapid advancements in computer vision in recent years. Lastly, we identify and discuss various alternative hardware solutions for data collection—in addition to drones, these include robotic platforms, climbing robots, and smart hangars—and discuss key challenges for their deployment, such as regulatory constraints, human–robot integration, and weather resilience. The fundamental contribution of this paper is to underscore the potential of computer vision for aircraft skin defect detection while emphasizing that further research is still required to address existing limitations.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/4/356aircraft defect detectioncomputer visionmaintenance repair and overhaul (MRO)YOLORT-DETR
spellingShingle Nutchanon Suvittawat
Christian Kurniawan
Jetanat Datephanyawat
Jordan Tay
Zhihao Liu
De Wen Soh
Nuno Antunes Ribeiro
Advances in Aircraft Skin Defect Detection Using Computer Vision: A Survey and Comparison of YOLOv9 and RT-DETR Performance
Aerospace
aircraft defect detection
computer vision
maintenance repair and overhaul (MRO)
YOLO
RT-DETR
title Advances in Aircraft Skin Defect Detection Using Computer Vision: A Survey and Comparison of YOLOv9 and RT-DETR Performance
title_full Advances in Aircraft Skin Defect Detection Using Computer Vision: A Survey and Comparison of YOLOv9 and RT-DETR Performance
title_fullStr Advances in Aircraft Skin Defect Detection Using Computer Vision: A Survey and Comparison of YOLOv9 and RT-DETR Performance
title_full_unstemmed Advances in Aircraft Skin Defect Detection Using Computer Vision: A Survey and Comparison of YOLOv9 and RT-DETR Performance
title_short Advances in Aircraft Skin Defect Detection Using Computer Vision: A Survey and Comparison of YOLOv9 and RT-DETR Performance
title_sort advances in aircraft skin defect detection using computer vision a survey and comparison of yolov9 and rt detr performance
topic aircraft defect detection
computer vision
maintenance repair and overhaul (MRO)
YOLO
RT-DETR
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/4/356
work_keys_str_mv AT nutchanonsuvittawat advancesinaircraftskindefectdetectionusingcomputervisionasurveyandcomparisonofyolov9andrtdetrperformance
AT christiankurniawan advancesinaircraftskindefectdetectionusingcomputervisionasurveyandcomparisonofyolov9andrtdetrperformance
AT jetanatdatephanyawat advancesinaircraftskindefectdetectionusingcomputervisionasurveyandcomparisonofyolov9andrtdetrperformance
AT jordantay advancesinaircraftskindefectdetectionusingcomputervisionasurveyandcomparisonofyolov9andrtdetrperformance
AT zhihaoliu advancesinaircraftskindefectdetectionusingcomputervisionasurveyandcomparisonofyolov9andrtdetrperformance
AT dewensoh advancesinaircraftskindefectdetectionusingcomputervisionasurveyandcomparisonofyolov9andrtdetrperformance
AT nunoantunesribeiro advancesinaircraftskindefectdetectionusingcomputervisionasurveyandcomparisonofyolov9andrtdetrperformance