The age‐old question: Thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicine

Abstract Objectives Emergency medicine has a demanding work environment. Characteristics influencing longevity among older physicians in emergency medicine have been the subject of ongoing discussion. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) released a policy statement in 2009 suggesting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William Binder, Casey O. Abrahams, Jordan M. Fox, Elizabeth Nestor, Janette Baird
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12499
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850232133821399040
author William Binder
Casey O. Abrahams
Jordan M. Fox
Elizabeth Nestor
Janette Baird
author_facet William Binder
Casey O. Abrahams
Jordan M. Fox
Elizabeth Nestor
Janette Baird
author_sort William Binder
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Emergency medicine has a demanding work environment. Characteristics influencing longevity among older physicians in emergency medicine have been the subject of ongoing discussion. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) released a policy statement in 2009 suggesting accommodating emergency physicians in preretirement years. We engaged emergency physicians to determine awareness of the ACEP policy and issues faced in preretirement years. Methods We conducted a series of online focus group discussions with a purposive sample of emergency physicians, age ≥ 50 years. The discussion guide was developed from the ACEP policy statement and relevant literature. Groups were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with a thematic coding system developed iteratively by the 4‐person team. Emerging themes were identified, organized, and presented with illustrative quotations. Results A total of 28 emergency physicians participated in 4 focus groups, with between 6 and 9 participants in each group. These physicians had between 17 and 35 years of clinical experience (median = 27), 6 were female (21%), and the majority (n = 26, 93%) worked in academic emergency medicine. Only 1 emergency physician was fully aware of the ACEP policy. Three principal content areas were identified: workload demands that change as physicians age, wellness and physician social equity, and senior emergency physician value. Interwoven across all of these was the focus on leadership and solutions to issues. Issues facing emergency physicians in their preretirement years were identified; commitment from emergency medicine site and national leadership and buy‐in from junior colleagues was emphasized. Generational conflicts in recognizing the contribution and needs of preretirement emergency physicians was a major barrier to solutions. Conclusions Workload demands, wellness and physician social equity, and concerns about value as a senior physician are major themes confronting preretirement emergency physicians. Generational divides, deficits in local and national leadership, and the health detriments of rotating schedules and night shifts are barriers to longevity in emergency medicine. Further research on the value of senior physicians and the impact of hospital and departmental financial models on adopting accommodations for senior emergency physicians is needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a1e4ab7f0e54f71b7a0cc0dbeebcac3
institution OA Journals
issn 2688-1152
language English
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
spelling doaj-art-0a1e4ab7f0e54f71b7a0cc0dbeebcac32025-08-20T02:03:17ZengElsevierJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2688-11522021-08-0124n/an/a10.1002/emp2.12499The age‐old question: Thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicineWilliam Binder0Casey O. Abrahams1Jordan M. Fox2Elizabeth Nestor3Janette Baird4Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence Rhode Island USAWarren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence Rhode Island USAWarren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence Rhode Island USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence Rhode Island USADepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence Rhode Island USAAbstract Objectives Emergency medicine has a demanding work environment. Characteristics influencing longevity among older physicians in emergency medicine have been the subject of ongoing discussion. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) released a policy statement in 2009 suggesting accommodating emergency physicians in preretirement years. We engaged emergency physicians to determine awareness of the ACEP policy and issues faced in preretirement years. Methods We conducted a series of online focus group discussions with a purposive sample of emergency physicians, age ≥ 50 years. The discussion guide was developed from the ACEP policy statement and relevant literature. Groups were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with a thematic coding system developed iteratively by the 4‐person team. Emerging themes were identified, organized, and presented with illustrative quotations. Results A total of 28 emergency physicians participated in 4 focus groups, with between 6 and 9 participants in each group. These physicians had between 17 and 35 years of clinical experience (median = 27), 6 were female (21%), and the majority (n = 26, 93%) worked in academic emergency medicine. Only 1 emergency physician was fully aware of the ACEP policy. Three principal content areas were identified: workload demands that change as physicians age, wellness and physician social equity, and senior emergency physician value. Interwoven across all of these was the focus on leadership and solutions to issues. Issues facing emergency physicians in their preretirement years were identified; commitment from emergency medicine site and national leadership and buy‐in from junior colleagues was emphasized. Generational conflicts in recognizing the contribution and needs of preretirement emergency physicians was a major barrier to solutions. Conclusions Workload demands, wellness and physician social equity, and concerns about value as a senior physician are major themes confronting preretirement emergency physicians. Generational divides, deficits in local and national leadership, and the health detriments of rotating schedules and night shifts are barriers to longevity in emergency medicine. Further research on the value of senior physicians and the impact of hospital and departmental financial models on adopting accommodations for senior emergency physicians is needed.https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12499agingemergency medicinefocus groupphysician perspectivesqualitative research
spellingShingle William Binder
Casey O. Abrahams
Jordan M. Fox
Elizabeth Nestor
Janette Baird
The age‐old question: Thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicine
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
aging
emergency medicine
focus group
physician perspectives
qualitative research
title The age‐old question: Thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicine
title_full The age‐old question: Thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicine
title_fullStr The age‐old question: Thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicine
title_full_unstemmed The age‐old question: Thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicine
title_short The age‐old question: Thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicine
title_sort age old question thematic analysis of focus groups on physician experiences of aging in emergency medicine
topic aging
emergency medicine
focus group
physician perspectives
qualitative research
url https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12499
work_keys_str_mv AT williambinder theageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT caseyoabrahams theageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT jordanmfox theageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT elizabethnestor theageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT janettebaird theageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT williambinder ageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT caseyoabrahams ageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT jordanmfox ageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT elizabethnestor ageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine
AT janettebaird ageoldquestionthematicanalysisoffocusgroupsonphysicianexperiencesofaginginemergencymedicine