Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system

Background and purpose:: This study focuses on evaluating a sub-fractionation workflow for intrafraction motion mitigation of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system. Materials and methods:: The investigated workflow consisted of two sub-fractions where int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgios Tsekas, Cornel Zachiu, Gijsbert H. Bol, Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp, Sandrine M.G. van de Pol, Johannes C.J. de Boer, Bas W. Raaymakers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000119
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861155802644480
author Georgios Tsekas
Cornel Zachiu
Gijsbert H. Bol
Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp
Sandrine M.G. van de Pol
Johannes C.J. de Boer
Bas W. Raaymakers
author_facet Georgios Tsekas
Cornel Zachiu
Gijsbert H. Bol
Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp
Sandrine M.G. van de Pol
Johannes C.J. de Boer
Bas W. Raaymakers
author_sort Georgios Tsekas
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose:: This study focuses on evaluating a sub-fractionation workflow for intrafraction motion mitigation of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system. Materials and methods:: The investigated workflow consisted of two sub-fractions where intrafraction drift correction steps were applied based on a daily reference plan. However, the daily contours were only rigidly shifted to match the intrafraction anatomies and therefore the clinical dosimetric constraints might be violated. In this work, daily contours were deformed to match the intrafraction anatomies and the online plans were re-calculated for a total of 15 patients. The deformed prostate contours were inspected by radiation oncologists and corrections were performed when necessary. Finally, a dose-volume parameter evaluation was performed on a sub-fraction level using the clinical plan parameters. Results:: Clinically acceptable coverage was reported for the target structures resulting in mean V95% of 99.7 % and 97.8 % for the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) respectively. Sub-fractions with insufficient CTV dose can be explained by the presence of intrafraction rotations and deformations that were not taken into account during intrafraction corrections. Additionally, for no sub-fraction the dose to the organs-at-risk exceeded the clinical constraints. Conclusion:: Given our results on the CTV coverage we can conclude that the sub-fractionation workflow met the dosimetric constraints for the hypofractionated treatment of the analyzed group of prostate cancer patients. A future dose accumulation study can provide further insights into the suitability of the clinical margins.
format Article
id doaj-art-091353715c14409c8763c3a4b448a067
institution Kabale University
issn 2405-6316
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj-art-091353715c14409c8763c3a4b448a0672025-02-10T04:34:35ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162025-01-0133100706Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy systemGeorgios Tsekas0Cornel Zachiu1Gijsbert H. Bol2Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp3Sandrine M.G. van de Pol4Johannes C.J. de Boer5Bas W. Raaymakers6Corresponding author.; Departement of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartement of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartement of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartement of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartement of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartement of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartement of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The NetherlandsBackground and purpose:: This study focuses on evaluating a sub-fractionation workflow for intrafraction motion mitigation of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system. Materials and methods:: The investigated workflow consisted of two sub-fractions where intrafraction drift correction steps were applied based on a daily reference plan. However, the daily contours were only rigidly shifted to match the intrafraction anatomies and therefore the clinical dosimetric constraints might be violated. In this work, daily contours were deformed to match the intrafraction anatomies and the online plans were re-calculated for a total of 15 patients. The deformed prostate contours were inspected by radiation oncologists and corrections were performed when necessary. Finally, a dose-volume parameter evaluation was performed on a sub-fraction level using the clinical plan parameters. Results:: Clinically acceptable coverage was reported for the target structures resulting in mean V95% of 99.7 % and 97.8 % for the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) respectively. Sub-fractions with insufficient CTV dose can be explained by the presence of intrafraction rotations and deformations that were not taken into account during intrafraction corrections. Additionally, for no sub-fraction the dose to the organs-at-risk exceeded the clinical constraints. Conclusion:: Given our results on the CTV coverage we can conclude that the sub-fractionation workflow met the dosimetric constraints for the hypofractionated treatment of the analyzed group of prostate cancer patients. A future dose accumulation study can provide further insights into the suitability of the clinical margins.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000119Prostate cancerMR-linacAdaptive radiotherapyAdapt-to-positionAdapt-to-shapeIntrafraction motion
spellingShingle Georgios Tsekas
Cornel Zachiu
Gijsbert H. Bol
Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp
Sandrine M.G. van de Pol
Johannes C.J. de Boer
Bas W. Raaymakers
Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Prostate cancer
MR-linac
Adaptive radiotherapy
Adapt-to-position
Adapt-to-shape
Intrafraction motion
title Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system
title_full Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system
title_fullStr Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system
title_full_unstemmed Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system
title_short Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system
title_sort dose volume parameter evaluation of a sub fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1 5 t magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system
topic Prostate cancer
MR-linac
Adaptive radiotherapy
Adapt-to-position
Adapt-to-shape
Intrafraction motion
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000119
work_keys_str_mv AT georgiostsekas dosevolumeparameterevaluationofasubfractionationworkflowforadaptiveradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientsona15tmagneticresonanceimagingradiotherapysystem
AT cornelzachiu dosevolumeparameterevaluationofasubfractionationworkflowforadaptiveradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientsona15tmagneticresonanceimagingradiotherapysystem
AT gijsberthbol dosevolumeparameterevaluationofasubfractionationworkflowforadaptiveradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientsona15tmagneticresonanceimagingradiotherapysystem
AT jochemrnvandervoortvanzyp dosevolumeparameterevaluationofasubfractionationworkflowforadaptiveradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientsona15tmagneticresonanceimagingradiotherapysystem
AT sandrinemgvandepol dosevolumeparameterevaluationofasubfractionationworkflowforadaptiveradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientsona15tmagneticresonanceimagingradiotherapysystem
AT johannescjdeboer dosevolumeparameterevaluationofasubfractionationworkflowforadaptiveradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientsona15tmagneticresonanceimagingradiotherapysystem
AT baswraaymakers dosevolumeparameterevaluationofasubfractionationworkflowforadaptiveradiotherapyofprostatecancerpatientsona15tmagneticresonanceimagingradiotherapysystem