A mobile tool for capturing greater sage‐grouse
ABSTRACT Capturing greater sage‐grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) using standard approaches can be challenging and inefficient, particularly in areas with relatively small populations and patchy habitat. In areas with low population densities, traditional trapping techniques such as drop‐netting an...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Andrew L. Sutphin, Thomas L. Maechtle, Christopher P. Kirol, Bradley C. Fedy |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2018-09-01
|
| Series: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.899 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Age and sex identification from wings of sage‐grouse
by: Clait E. Braun, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Seasonal movements of greater sage‐grouse populations in Utah: Implications for species conservation
by: David K. Dahlgren, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Greater sage‐grouse and fences: Does marking reduce collisions?
by: Bryan S. Stevens, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01) -
Greater sage‐grouse male lek counts relative to a wind energy development
by: Chad W. Lebeau, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Large‐scale control site selection for population monitoring: An example assessing sage‐grouse trends
by: Bradley C. Fedy, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)