Utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A prospective pilot study

Abstract Background Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment has advanced with therapies such as androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), taxane chemotherapies like docetaxel, and novel agents like 177Lu-PSMA. However, predicting patient responses and sequencing therapi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kambiz Rahbar, Katrin Schlack, Martin Bögemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14549-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849764406794125312
author Kambiz Rahbar
Katrin Schlack
Martin Bögemann
author_facet Kambiz Rahbar
Katrin Schlack
Martin Bögemann
author_sort Kambiz Rahbar
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment has advanced with therapies such as androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), taxane chemotherapies like docetaxel, and novel agents like 177Lu-PSMA. However, predicting patient responses and sequencing therapies remain critical unmet needs. This study investigated whether the PROSTest, a molecular assay analyzing prostate cancer-specific transcripts, could predict treatment response or prognosis in mCRPC patients receiving docetaxel, compared to changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Methods Nineteen patients with mCRPC were treated with a median of 10 docetaxel cycles. PROSTest, which measures tumor-related signaling pathways, was analyzed via qPCR, while PSA levels were determined using standard clinical assays. PSA and PROSTest scores were measured at baseline and after one treatment cycle. PROSTest, which evaluates tumor-related signaling pathways, was analyzed via qPCR, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured using standard clinical assays. Responses were categorized per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3-criteria. Associations between biomarker changes, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and hazard ratios (HRs). Results Baseline PSA and PROSTest scores did not predict response or survival. However, early changes in both biomarkers after one treatment cycle significantly correlated with PSA-PFS. PROSTest changes demonstrated a stronger association with PFS (HR: 0.04) compared to PSA (HR: 0.2). Early changes in PROSTest were also significantly (p = 0.03, AUC = 0.81 ± 0.14) associated with OS in contrast to PSA changes. Conclusions This pilot study suggests that PROSTest may offer superior predictive and prognostic value compared to PSA in mCRPC patients undergoing docetaxel therapy. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings and validate the assay’s clinical integration. Trial registration NCT06872619.
format Article
id doaj-art-08f953ca14aa4f9a92fa8f9edc37f72c
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2407
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj-art-08f953ca14aa4f9a92fa8f9edc37f72c2025-08-20T03:05:09ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072025-07-012511810.1186/s12885-025-14549-3Utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A prospective pilot studyKambiz Rahbar0Katrin Schlack1Martin Bögemann2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital MuensterDepartment of Urology, University Hospital MuensterDepartment of Urology, University Hospital MuensterAbstract Background Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment has advanced with therapies such as androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), taxane chemotherapies like docetaxel, and novel agents like 177Lu-PSMA. However, predicting patient responses and sequencing therapies remain critical unmet needs. This study investigated whether the PROSTest, a molecular assay analyzing prostate cancer-specific transcripts, could predict treatment response or prognosis in mCRPC patients receiving docetaxel, compared to changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Methods Nineteen patients with mCRPC were treated with a median of 10 docetaxel cycles. PROSTest, which measures tumor-related signaling pathways, was analyzed via qPCR, while PSA levels were determined using standard clinical assays. PSA and PROSTest scores were measured at baseline and after one treatment cycle. PROSTest, which evaluates tumor-related signaling pathways, was analyzed via qPCR, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured using standard clinical assays. Responses were categorized per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3-criteria. Associations between biomarker changes, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and hazard ratios (HRs). Results Baseline PSA and PROSTest scores did not predict response or survival. However, early changes in both biomarkers after one treatment cycle significantly correlated with PSA-PFS. PROSTest changes demonstrated a stronger association with PFS (HR: 0.04) compared to PSA (HR: 0.2). Early changes in PROSTest were also significantly (p = 0.03, AUC = 0.81 ± 0.14) associated with OS in contrast to PSA changes. Conclusions This pilot study suggests that PROSTest may offer superior predictive and prognostic value compared to PSA in mCRPC patients undergoing docetaxel therapy. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings and validate the assay’s clinical integration. Trial registration NCT06872619.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14549-3PROSTestProstate cancerDocetaxel
spellingShingle Kambiz Rahbar
Katrin Schlack
Martin Bögemann
Utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A prospective pilot study
BMC Cancer
PROSTest
Prostate cancer
Docetaxel
title Utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A prospective pilot study
title_full Utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A prospective pilot study
title_fullStr Utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A prospective pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A prospective pilot study
title_short Utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A prospective pilot study
title_sort utility of the prostest to predict and monitor response to chemotherapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer a prospective pilot study
topic PROSTest
Prostate cancer
Docetaxel
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14549-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kambizrahbar utilityoftheprostesttopredictandmonitorresponsetochemotherapyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprospectivepilotstudy
AT katrinschlack utilityoftheprostesttopredictandmonitorresponsetochemotherapyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprospectivepilotstudy
AT martinbogemann utilityoftheprostesttopredictandmonitorresponsetochemotherapyinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprospectivepilotstudy