Viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles.

Artworks are often shown alongside informative contextual text. This can be as simple as its title and date, or it can be a more descriptive or elaborative explanation of the piece, such as describing its content or explaining the symbolism of the work. Contextual information has been shown to have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eugene McSorley, Rachel McCloy, Louis Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308591
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850221693749952512
author Eugene McSorley
Rachel McCloy
Louis Williams
author_facet Eugene McSorley
Rachel McCloy
Louis Williams
author_sort Eugene McSorley
collection DOAJ
description Artworks are often shown alongside informative contextual text. This can be as simple as its title and date, or it can be a more descriptive or elaborative explanation of the piece, such as describing its content or explaining the symbolism of the work. Contextual information has been shown to have no impact on early viewing behaviour. A consistent impact on observer eye movement scan paths and fixations is only found in the later periods of looking. One explanation for this is that early eye movement responses to artworks support automatic low-level visual processing that quickly extracts a broad, holistic gist or sense of the works, allowing rapid categorization. The influence of contextual information may only be felt in later periods as it concentrates fixations on descriptive or elaborative elements more quickly and for longer periods. To examine this explanation, we recorded eye movement responses to abstract paintings that were preceded by basic-level categorical labels. In Experiment 1, abstract works were preceded by the labels Landscape, Portrait or Abstract, while in Experiment 2 the labels Action, Still Life or Abstract were given. We found that saccadic eye movements were more common in the first 2 seconds of viewing and were spread over a large portion of the artworks. They became less frequent and were spatially clustered over time. This changing pattern of saccades and their fixation periods was not affected by the contextual information provided by the category labels suggesting a minimal role for top-down control of eye movements when viewers are faced with abstract artworks.
format Article
id doaj-art-08cd026a37814e4383f551ca3fc9a327
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-08cd026a37814e4383f551ca3fc9a3272025-08-20T02:06:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01206e030859110.1371/journal.pone.0308591Viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles.Eugene McSorleyRachel McCloyLouis WilliamsArtworks are often shown alongside informative contextual text. This can be as simple as its title and date, or it can be a more descriptive or elaborative explanation of the piece, such as describing its content or explaining the symbolism of the work. Contextual information has been shown to have no impact on early viewing behaviour. A consistent impact on observer eye movement scan paths and fixations is only found in the later periods of looking. One explanation for this is that early eye movement responses to artworks support automatic low-level visual processing that quickly extracts a broad, holistic gist or sense of the works, allowing rapid categorization. The influence of contextual information may only be felt in later periods as it concentrates fixations on descriptive or elaborative elements more quickly and for longer periods. To examine this explanation, we recorded eye movement responses to abstract paintings that were preceded by basic-level categorical labels. In Experiment 1, abstract works were preceded by the labels Landscape, Portrait or Abstract, while in Experiment 2 the labels Action, Still Life or Abstract were given. We found that saccadic eye movements were more common in the first 2 seconds of viewing and were spread over a large portion of the artworks. They became less frequent and were spatially clustered over time. This changing pattern of saccades and their fixation periods was not affected by the contextual information provided by the category labels suggesting a minimal role for top-down control of eye movements when viewers are faced with abstract artworks.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308591
spellingShingle Eugene McSorley
Rachel McCloy
Louis Williams
Viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles.
PLoS ONE
title Viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles.
title_full Viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles.
title_fullStr Viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles.
title_full_unstemmed Viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles.
title_short Viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles.
title_sort viewing of abstract art follows a gist to survey gaze pattern over time regardless of broad categorical titles
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308591
work_keys_str_mv AT eugenemcsorley viewingofabstractartfollowsagisttosurveygazepatternovertimeregardlessofbroadcategoricaltitles
AT rachelmccloy viewingofabstractartfollowsagisttosurveygazepatternovertimeregardlessofbroadcategoricaltitles
AT louiswilliams viewingofabstractartfollowsagisttosurveygazepatternovertimeregardlessofbroadcategoricaltitles