Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data

Objective To assess socioeconomic differences between patients registered with private and public primary healthcare centres.Design Population-based cross-sectional study controlling for municipality and household.Setting Swedish population-based socioeconomic data collected from Statistics Sweden l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ulrika Winblad, David Isaksson, Paula Blomqvist, Ronnie Pingel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/10/e020402.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849717466245103616
author Ulrika Winblad
David Isaksson
Paula Blomqvist
Ronnie Pingel
author_facet Ulrika Winblad
David Isaksson
Paula Blomqvist
Ronnie Pingel
author_sort Ulrika Winblad
collection DOAJ
description Objective To assess socioeconomic differences between patients registered with private and public primary healthcare centres.Design Population-based cross-sectional study controlling for municipality and household.Setting Swedish population-based socioeconomic data collected from Statistics Sweden linked with individual registration data from all 21 Swedish regions.Participants All individuals residing in Sweden on 31 December 2015 (n=9 851 017) were included in the study.Primary outcome measures Registration with private versus public primary healthcare centres.Results After controlling for municipality and household, individuals with higher socioeconomic status were more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider. Individuals in the highest income quantile were 4.9 percentage points (13.7%) more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with individuals in the lowest income quantile. Individuals with 1–3 years of higher education were 4.7 percentage points more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with those with an incomplete primary education.Conclusions The results show that there are notable differences in registration patterns, indicating a skewed distribution of patients and health risks between private and public primary healthcare providers. This suggests that risk selection behaviour occurs in the reformed Swedish primary healthcare system, foremost through location patterns.
format Article
id doaj-art-08c18c9a9cea4fceacde888a7fa53252
institution DOAJ
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-08c18c9a9cea4fceacde888a7fa532522025-08-20T03:12:39ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552018-10-0181010.1136/bmjopen-2017-020402Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual dataUlrika Winblad0David Isaksson1Paula Blomqvist2Ronnie Pingel36 Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden1 Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden2 Department of Governance, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden1 Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenObjective To assess socioeconomic differences between patients registered with private and public primary healthcare centres.Design Population-based cross-sectional study controlling for municipality and household.Setting Swedish population-based socioeconomic data collected from Statistics Sweden linked with individual registration data from all 21 Swedish regions.Participants All individuals residing in Sweden on 31 December 2015 (n=9 851 017) were included in the study.Primary outcome measures Registration with private versus public primary healthcare centres.Results After controlling for municipality and household, individuals with higher socioeconomic status were more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider. Individuals in the highest income quantile were 4.9 percentage points (13.7%) more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with individuals in the lowest income quantile. Individuals with 1–3 years of higher education were 4.7 percentage points more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with those with an incomplete primary education.Conclusions The results show that there are notable differences in registration patterns, indicating a skewed distribution of patients and health risks between private and public primary healthcare providers. This suggests that risk selection behaviour occurs in the reformed Swedish primary healthcare system, foremost through location patterns.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/10/e020402.full
spellingShingle Ulrika Winblad
David Isaksson
Paula Blomqvist
Ronnie Pingel
Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
BMJ Open
title Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_full Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_fullStr Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_full_unstemmed Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_short Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_sort risk selection in primary care a cross sectional fixed effect analysis of swedish individual data
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/10/e020402.full
work_keys_str_mv AT ulrikawinblad riskselectioninprimarycareacrosssectionalfixedeffectanalysisofswedishindividualdata
AT davidisaksson riskselectioninprimarycareacrosssectionalfixedeffectanalysisofswedishindividualdata
AT paulablomqvist riskselectioninprimarycareacrosssectionalfixedeffectanalysisofswedishindividualdata
AT ronniepingel riskselectioninprimarycareacrosssectionalfixedeffectanalysisofswedishindividualdata