Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective

This study aims to reveal the reality of accountability of the LMDH Wono Lestari forestry partnership and criticize the practices that occur from Habermas' perspective. This research uses a qualitative method of critical paradigm case study. The research site is at LMDH Wono Lestari, Burno Vil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taufiq Ramadhan, Eko Ganis Sukoharsono, Lilik Purwanti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Asia Malang 2025-07-01
Series:Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis dan Ekonomi Asia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jibeka.asia.ac.id/index.php/jibeka/article/view/2259
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850043981514145792
author Taufiq Ramadhan
Eko Ganis Sukoharsono
Lilik Purwanti
author_facet Taufiq Ramadhan
Eko Ganis Sukoharsono
Lilik Purwanti
author_sort Taufiq Ramadhan
collection DOAJ
description This study aims to reveal the reality of accountability of the LMDH Wono Lestari forestry partnership and criticize the practices that occur from Habermas' perspective. This research uses a qualitative method of critical paradigm case study. The research site is at LMDH Wono Lestari, Burno Village, Lumajang Regency. Informants consisted of representatives of the new LMDH management, old LMDH members, Perum Perhutani employees, agricultural commodity offtakers, and the community. Data analysis uses Jurgen Habermas' critical perspective. Accountability practices such as transparency and LMDH functions do not work. Likewise, there is low member participation, lack of management participation, and work plans that are not running well. The above causes internal and external conflicts for LMDH. It is necessary to update regulations and clarify the profit-sharing mechanism regarding the Forestry Partnership between LMDH Wono Lestari and Perum Perhutani in terms of accountability and transparency, such as the involvement of the Village Government as a partnership supervisor, as well as instilling honesty and expecting blessings from the Forestry Partnership. 
format Article
id doaj-art-089e8e2afbcf4a3097a0ebfedef0c4f8
institution DOAJ
issn 2620-875X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Asia Malang
record_format Article
series Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis dan Ekonomi Asia
spelling doaj-art-089e8e2afbcf4a3097a0ebfedef0c4f82025-08-20T02:55:06ZengInstitut Teknologi dan Bisnis Asia MalangJurnal Ilmiah Bisnis dan Ekonomi Asia2620-875X2025-07-0119210.32815/jibeka.v19i2.2259Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas PerspectiveTaufiq Ramadhan0Eko Ganis Sukoharsono1Lilik Purwanti2University of BrawijayaUniversity of BrawijayaUniversity of Brawijaya This study aims to reveal the reality of accountability of the LMDH Wono Lestari forestry partnership and criticize the practices that occur from Habermas' perspective. This research uses a qualitative method of critical paradigm case study. The research site is at LMDH Wono Lestari, Burno Village, Lumajang Regency. Informants consisted of representatives of the new LMDH management, old LMDH members, Perum Perhutani employees, agricultural commodity offtakers, and the community. Data analysis uses Jurgen Habermas' critical perspective. Accountability practices such as transparency and LMDH functions do not work. Likewise, there is low member participation, lack of management participation, and work plans that are not running well. The above causes internal and external conflicts for LMDH. It is necessary to update regulations and clarify the profit-sharing mechanism regarding the Forestry Partnership between LMDH Wono Lestari and Perum Perhutani in terms of accountability and transparency, such as the involvement of the Village Government as a partnership supervisor, as well as instilling honesty and expecting blessings from the Forestry Partnership.  http://jibeka.asia.ac.id/index.php/jibeka/article/view/2259CriticismAccountabilitySocial Forestry PartnershipJurgen Habermas
spellingShingle Taufiq Ramadhan
Eko Ganis Sukoharsono
Lilik Purwanti
Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective
Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis dan Ekonomi Asia
Criticism
Accountability
Social Forestry Partnership
Jurgen Habermas
title Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective
title_full Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective
title_fullStr Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective
title_short Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective
title_sort criticism of accountability in social forestry partnership from habermas perspective
topic Criticism
Accountability
Social Forestry Partnership
Jurgen Habermas
url http://jibeka.asia.ac.id/index.php/jibeka/article/view/2259
work_keys_str_mv AT taufiqramadhan criticismofaccountabilityinsocialforestrypartnershipfromhabermasperspective
AT ekoganissukoharsono criticismofaccountabilityinsocialforestrypartnershipfromhabermasperspective
AT lilikpurwanti criticismofaccountabilityinsocialforestrypartnershipfromhabermasperspective