Swimming and Persons with Mild Persistant Asthma

The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of recreational swimming on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in patients with mild persistent asthma. This study included 65 patients with mild persistent asthma, who were divided into two groups: experimental group A (n = 45) and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mirjana Arandelovic, Ivana Stankovic, Maja Nikolic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2007-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.221
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554129779589120
author Mirjana Arandelovic
Ivana Stankovic
Maja Nikolic
author_facet Mirjana Arandelovic
Ivana Stankovic
Maja Nikolic
author_sort Mirjana Arandelovic
collection DOAJ
description The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of recreational swimming on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in patients with mild persistent asthma. This study included 65 patients with mild persistent asthma, who were divided into two groups: experimental group A (n = 45) and control group B (n = 20). Patients from both groups were treated with low doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and short-acting β2 agonists salbutamol as needed. Our program for patients in group A was combined asthma education with swimming (twice a week on a 1-h basis for the following 6 months). At the end of the study, in Group A, we found a statistically significant increase of lung function parameters FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec) (3.55 vs. 3.65) (p < 0.01), FVC (forced vital capacity) (4.27 vs. 4.37) (p < 0.05), PEF (peak expiratory flow) (7.08 vs. 7.46) (p < 0.01), and statistically significant decrease of BHR (PD20 0.58 vs. 2.01) (p < 0.001). In Group B, there was a statistically significant improvement of FEV1 3.29 vs. 3.33 (p < 0.05) and although FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF were improved, it was not significant. When Groups A and B were compared at the end of the study, there was a statistically significant difference of FVC (4.01 vs. 4.37), FEV1 (3.33 vs. 3.55), PEF (6.79 vs.7.46), and variability (p <0.001), and statistically significantly decreased BHR in Group A (2.01 vs. 1.75) (p < 0.001). Engagement of patients with mild persistent asthma in recreational swimming in nonchlorinated pools, combined with regular medical treatment and education, leads to better improvement of their parameters of lung function and also to more significant decrease of their airway hyperresponsiveness compared to patients treated with traditional medicine
format Article
id doaj-art-089cb11057614154887a9972a9126f85
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2007-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-089cb11057614154887a9972a9126f852025-02-03T05:52:17ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2007-01-0171182118810.1100/tsw.2007.221Swimming and Persons with Mild Persistant AsthmaMirjana Arandelovic0Ivana Stankovic1Maja Nikolic2Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, SerbiaFaculty of Medicine, University of Niš, SerbiaFaculty of Medicine, University of Niš, SerbiaThe aim of our study was to analyze the effect of recreational swimming on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in patients with mild persistent asthma. This study included 65 patients with mild persistent asthma, who were divided into two groups: experimental group A (n = 45) and control group B (n = 20). Patients from both groups were treated with low doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and short-acting β2 agonists salbutamol as needed. Our program for patients in group A was combined asthma education with swimming (twice a week on a 1-h basis for the following 6 months). At the end of the study, in Group A, we found a statistically significant increase of lung function parameters FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec) (3.55 vs. 3.65) (p < 0.01), FVC (forced vital capacity) (4.27 vs. 4.37) (p < 0.05), PEF (peak expiratory flow) (7.08 vs. 7.46) (p < 0.01), and statistically significant decrease of BHR (PD20 0.58 vs. 2.01) (p < 0.001). In Group B, there was a statistically significant improvement of FEV1 3.29 vs. 3.33 (p < 0.05) and although FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF were improved, it was not significant. When Groups A and B were compared at the end of the study, there was a statistically significant difference of FVC (4.01 vs. 4.37), FEV1 (3.33 vs. 3.55), PEF (6.79 vs.7.46), and variability (p <0.001), and statistically significantly decreased BHR in Group A (2.01 vs. 1.75) (p < 0.001). Engagement of patients with mild persistent asthma in recreational swimming in nonchlorinated pools, combined with regular medical treatment and education, leads to better improvement of their parameters of lung function and also to more significant decrease of their airway hyperresponsiveness compared to patients treated with traditional medicinehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.221
spellingShingle Mirjana Arandelovic
Ivana Stankovic
Maja Nikolic
Swimming and Persons with Mild Persistant Asthma
The Scientific World Journal
title Swimming and Persons with Mild Persistant Asthma
title_full Swimming and Persons with Mild Persistant Asthma
title_fullStr Swimming and Persons with Mild Persistant Asthma
title_full_unstemmed Swimming and Persons with Mild Persistant Asthma
title_short Swimming and Persons with Mild Persistant Asthma
title_sort swimming and persons with mild persistant asthma
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.221
work_keys_str_mv AT mirjanaarandelovic swimmingandpersonswithmildpersistantasthma
AT ivanastankovic swimmingandpersonswithmildpersistantasthma
AT majanikolic swimmingandpersonswithmildpersistantasthma