Comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and pH with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low-risk surgical patients – A randomized clinical trial

Background and Aims: The role of preoperative pharmacological prophylaxis in preventing aspiration pneumonitis under general anesthesia (GA) in patients at low risk of aspiration pneumonitis is still under debate. We addressed the need for routine pharmacological aspiration prophylaxis in at-risk po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Balaji Kannamani, Sakthirajan Panneerselvam, Priya Rudingwa, Ashok S. Badhe, Kirthiha Govindaraj, Srivats V. Ramamoorthy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-04-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/joacp.joacp_412_22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064035275341824
author Balaji Kannamani
Sakthirajan Panneerselvam
Priya Rudingwa
Ashok S. Badhe
Kirthiha Govindaraj
Srivats V. Ramamoorthy
author_facet Balaji Kannamani
Sakthirajan Panneerselvam
Priya Rudingwa
Ashok S. Badhe
Kirthiha Govindaraj
Srivats V. Ramamoorthy
author_sort Balaji Kannamani
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: The role of preoperative pharmacological prophylaxis in preventing aspiration pneumonitis under general anesthesia (GA) in patients at low risk of aspiration pneumonitis is still under debate. We addressed the need for routine pharmacological aspiration prophylaxis in at-risk population by assessing the change in gastric volume using ultrasound with and without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis. Material and Methods: A single-center, randomized double-blinded trial, with 200 adult patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures under GA, were randomized into a prophylaxis group, in which the patients received oral famotidine and metoclopramide, and a no prophylaxis group, in which the patients did not receive any prophylaxis. Gastric volume derived from preinduction measurement of gastric antral volume by ultrasound, postinduction gastric pH, and incidences of aspiration pneumonitis were compared. Bland–Altman plot was used to determine the level of agreement between measured gastric volume and ultrasonography based on calculated gastric volume. Results: The gastric antral cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the no prophylaxis group (3.12 cm2 and 20.11 ml, respectively) were comparable to the prophylaxis group (2.56 cm2 and 19.67 ml, respectively) (P-values 0.97 and 0.63, respectively). Although there was a statistically significant decrease in gastric pH in the no prophylaxis group (P-value 0.01), it was not clinically significant to increase the risk of aspiration pneumonitis based on Roberts and Shirley criteria (P-value 0.39). Conclusion: In an adequately fasted low-risk population, the amount of residual gastric volume was similar and below the aspiration threshold, regardless of the aspiration prophylaxis status.
format Article
id doaj-art-087f06888d06444ba29c8d9eed5f7ab7
institution DOAJ
issn 2231-2730
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
spelling doaj-art-087f06888d06444ba29c8d9eed5f7ab72025-08-20T02:49:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology2231-27302024-04-0140229930410.4103/joacp.joacp_412_22Comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and pH with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low-risk surgical patients – A randomized clinical trialBalaji KannamaniSakthirajan PanneerselvamPriya RudingwaAshok S. BadheKirthiha GovindarajSrivats V. RamamoorthyBackground and Aims: The role of preoperative pharmacological prophylaxis in preventing aspiration pneumonitis under general anesthesia (GA) in patients at low risk of aspiration pneumonitis is still under debate. We addressed the need for routine pharmacological aspiration prophylaxis in at-risk population by assessing the change in gastric volume using ultrasound with and without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis. Material and Methods: A single-center, randomized double-blinded trial, with 200 adult patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures under GA, were randomized into a prophylaxis group, in which the patients received oral famotidine and metoclopramide, and a no prophylaxis group, in which the patients did not receive any prophylaxis. Gastric volume derived from preinduction measurement of gastric antral volume by ultrasound, postinduction gastric pH, and incidences of aspiration pneumonitis were compared. Bland–Altman plot was used to determine the level of agreement between measured gastric volume and ultrasonography based on calculated gastric volume. Results: The gastric antral cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the no prophylaxis group (3.12 cm2 and 20.11 ml, respectively) were comparable to the prophylaxis group (2.56 cm2 and 19.67 ml, respectively) (P-values 0.97 and 0.63, respectively). Although there was a statistically significant decrease in gastric pH in the no prophylaxis group (P-value 0.01), it was not clinically significant to increase the risk of aspiration pneumonitis based on Roberts and Shirley criteria (P-value 0.39). Conclusion: In an adequately fasted low-risk population, the amount of residual gastric volume was similar and below the aspiration threshold, regardless of the aspiration prophylaxis status.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/joacp.joacp_412_22aspiration pneumoniaaspiration prophylaxisgastric volumegeneral anesthesiah2 receptor antagonistsprokineticsultrasonography
spellingShingle Balaji Kannamani
Sakthirajan Panneerselvam
Priya Rudingwa
Ashok S. Badhe
Kirthiha Govindaraj
Srivats V. Ramamoorthy
Comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and pH with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low-risk surgical patients – A randomized clinical trial
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
aspiration pneumonia
aspiration prophylaxis
gastric volume
general anesthesia
h2 receptor antagonists
prokinetics
ultrasonography
title Comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and pH with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low-risk surgical patients – A randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and pH with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low-risk surgical patients – A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and pH with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low-risk surgical patients – A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and pH with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low-risk surgical patients – A randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and pH with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low-risk surgical patients – A randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral volume and ph with or without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis in low risk surgical patients a randomized clinical trial
topic aspiration pneumonia
aspiration prophylaxis
gastric volume
general anesthesia
h2 receptor antagonists
prokinetics
ultrasonography
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/joacp.joacp_412_22
work_keys_str_mv AT balajikannamani comparisonofultrasonographicmeasurementofgastricantralvolumeandphwithorwithoutpharmacologicalacidaspirationprophylaxisinlowrisksurgicalpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sakthirajanpanneerselvam comparisonofultrasonographicmeasurementofgastricantralvolumeandphwithorwithoutpharmacologicalacidaspirationprophylaxisinlowrisksurgicalpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT priyarudingwa comparisonofultrasonographicmeasurementofgastricantralvolumeandphwithorwithoutpharmacologicalacidaspirationprophylaxisinlowrisksurgicalpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ashoksbadhe comparisonofultrasonographicmeasurementofgastricantralvolumeandphwithorwithoutpharmacologicalacidaspirationprophylaxisinlowrisksurgicalpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kirthihagovindaraj comparisonofultrasonographicmeasurementofgastricantralvolumeandphwithorwithoutpharmacologicalacidaspirationprophylaxisinlowrisksurgicalpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT srivatsvramamoorthy comparisonofultrasonographicmeasurementofgastricantralvolumeandphwithorwithoutpharmacologicalacidaspirationprophylaxisinlowrisksurgicalpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial