Herbicide strategies for weed control in Wisconsin conventional-tillage corn production systems

Selection of effective herbicide strategies (i.e., one-pass versus two-pass and timing [preemergence versus postemergence]) is of great importance to corn growers. Field studies were conducted to evaluate overall end-of-season weed control efficacy of multiple herbicide strategies in conventional ti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmadreza Mobli, Ryan P. DeWerff, Nicholas J. Arneson, Daniel H. Smith, Rodrigo Werle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Weed Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0890037X24000939/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849420198776406016
author Ahmadreza Mobli
Ryan P. DeWerff
Nicholas J. Arneson
Daniel H. Smith
Rodrigo Werle
author_facet Ahmadreza Mobli
Ryan P. DeWerff
Nicholas J. Arneson
Daniel H. Smith
Rodrigo Werle
author_sort Ahmadreza Mobli
collection DOAJ
description Selection of effective herbicide strategies (i.e., one-pass versus two-pass and timing [preemergence versus postemergence]) is of great importance to corn growers. Field studies were conducted to evaluate overall end-of-season weed control efficacy of multiple herbicide strategies in conventional tillage corn production systems. These studies were carried out over six site-years at four locations in Wisconsin: Arlington (2018 and 2019), Brooklyn (2019), Lancaster (2019), and Janesville (2018 and 2019). Herbicide strategy treatments included one-pass preemergence, one-pass postemergence, two-pass preemergence followed by (fb) postemergence, and two-pass preemergence fb postemergence with layered residual herbicides. The weed species present at the experimental site-years included common lambsquarters, giant foxtail, giant ragweed, velvetleaf, and waterhemp. Except Arlington-2019, the herbicide strategy was not as influential for the site-years infested with common lambsquarters, giant foxtail, velvetleaf, and waterhemp species (e.g., Arlington-2018, Brooklyn-2019, Lancaster-2019), as effective overall end-of-season control (>90%) was achieved regardless of the herbicide strategy, and no significant differences were observed in the combined weed biomass across strategies. A two-pass strategy (e.g., preemergence followed by postemergence, or preemergence followed by postemergence with layered residual herbicides) was necessary for effective overall end-of-season control at the site-years infested with giant ragweed (Janesville-2018 and -2019). Weed interference reduced corn yield by 11% to 75% across site-years. Although certain weed communities can be effectively controlled by a one-pass herbicide strategy, two-pass strategies provided the greatest and most consistent overall end-of-season weed control and corn yield across all site-years, regardless of weed species composition and environmental conditions. Hence, a two-pass herbicide strategy is recommended for conventional-tillage corn production in Wisconsin to ensure effective end-of-season weed control while protecting yield potential of the crop, particularly in fields infested with moderate to high density of troublesome weeds such as giant ragweed.
format Article
id doaj-art-0840d712a7ee4aceb732ee749f33e8db
institution Kabale University
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Weed Technology
spelling doaj-art-0840d712a7ee4aceb732ee749f33e8db2025-08-20T03:31:49ZengCambridge University PressWeed Technology0890-037X1550-27402025-01-013910.1017/wet.2024.93Herbicide strategies for weed control in Wisconsin conventional-tillage corn production systemsAhmadreza Mobli0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9332-1879Ryan P. DeWerff1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-9560Nicholas J. Arneson2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0613-1602Daniel H. Smith3Rodrigo Werle4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1132-461XScientist, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAResearch Specialist, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAFormer Outreach Program Manager, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USASouthwest Regional Agronomist, Nutrient and Pest Management Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USAAssociate Professor, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USASelection of effective herbicide strategies (i.e., one-pass versus two-pass and timing [preemergence versus postemergence]) is of great importance to corn growers. Field studies were conducted to evaluate overall end-of-season weed control efficacy of multiple herbicide strategies in conventional tillage corn production systems. These studies were carried out over six site-years at four locations in Wisconsin: Arlington (2018 and 2019), Brooklyn (2019), Lancaster (2019), and Janesville (2018 and 2019). Herbicide strategy treatments included one-pass preemergence, one-pass postemergence, two-pass preemergence followed by (fb) postemergence, and two-pass preemergence fb postemergence with layered residual herbicides. The weed species present at the experimental site-years included common lambsquarters, giant foxtail, giant ragweed, velvetleaf, and waterhemp. Except Arlington-2019, the herbicide strategy was not as influential for the site-years infested with common lambsquarters, giant foxtail, velvetleaf, and waterhemp species (e.g., Arlington-2018, Brooklyn-2019, Lancaster-2019), as effective overall end-of-season control (>90%) was achieved regardless of the herbicide strategy, and no significant differences were observed in the combined weed biomass across strategies. A two-pass strategy (e.g., preemergence followed by postemergence, or preemergence followed by postemergence with layered residual herbicides) was necessary for effective overall end-of-season control at the site-years infested with giant ragweed (Janesville-2018 and -2019). Weed interference reduced corn yield by 11% to 75% across site-years. Although certain weed communities can be effectively controlled by a one-pass herbicide strategy, two-pass strategies provided the greatest and most consistent overall end-of-season weed control and corn yield across all site-years, regardless of weed species composition and environmental conditions. Hence, a two-pass herbicide strategy is recommended for conventional-tillage corn production in Wisconsin to ensure effective end-of-season weed control while protecting yield potential of the crop, particularly in fields infested with moderate to high density of troublesome weeds such as giant ragweed.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0890037X24000939/type/journal_articleAcetochlorbicyclopyroneclopyraliddicambaflumetsulamglyphosatemesotrionerimsulfuronS-metolachlortembotrionecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm.giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik.waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauercorn, Zea mays L.Chemical weed managementherbicide efficacypostemergence herbicidepreemergence herbicidetwo-pass herbicide program
spellingShingle Ahmadreza Mobli
Ryan P. DeWerff
Nicholas J. Arneson
Daniel H. Smith
Rodrigo Werle
Herbicide strategies for weed control in Wisconsin conventional-tillage corn production systems
Weed Technology
Acetochlor
bicyclopyrone
clopyralid
dicamba
flumetsulam
glyphosate
mesotrione
rimsulfuron
S-metolachlor
tembotrione
common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.
giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm.
giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.
velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik.
waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer
corn, Zea mays L.
Chemical weed management
herbicide efficacy
postemergence herbicide
preemergence herbicide
two-pass herbicide program
title Herbicide strategies for weed control in Wisconsin conventional-tillage corn production systems
title_full Herbicide strategies for weed control in Wisconsin conventional-tillage corn production systems
title_fullStr Herbicide strategies for weed control in Wisconsin conventional-tillage corn production systems
title_full_unstemmed Herbicide strategies for weed control in Wisconsin conventional-tillage corn production systems
title_short Herbicide strategies for weed control in Wisconsin conventional-tillage corn production systems
title_sort herbicide strategies for weed control in wisconsin conventional tillage corn production systems
topic Acetochlor
bicyclopyrone
clopyralid
dicamba
flumetsulam
glyphosate
mesotrione
rimsulfuron
S-metolachlor
tembotrione
common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.
giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm.
giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.
velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik.
waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer
corn, Zea mays L.
Chemical weed management
herbicide efficacy
postemergence herbicide
preemergence herbicide
two-pass herbicide program
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0890037X24000939/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadrezamobli herbicidestrategiesforweedcontrolinwisconsinconventionaltillagecornproductionsystems
AT ryanpdewerff herbicidestrategiesforweedcontrolinwisconsinconventionaltillagecornproductionsystems
AT nicholasjarneson herbicidestrategiesforweedcontrolinwisconsinconventionaltillagecornproductionsystems
AT danielhsmith herbicidestrategiesforweedcontrolinwisconsinconventionaltillagecornproductionsystems
AT rodrigowerle herbicidestrategiesforweedcontrolinwisconsinconventionaltillagecornproductionsystems