Pocket-sized hand-held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert clinicians

Background/ObjectivesPediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a global health concern. This study evaluates the utility of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) as a tool for assessing PFC among clinicians with varying levels of ultrasound (US) experience. We assessed the validity of PsUS in measuring tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pola Waissman, Ron Berant, Lisa Amir, Shimon Reif, Shmuel Springer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1624070/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849405578168762368
author Pola Waissman
Ron Berant
Lisa Amir
Shimon Reif
Shmuel Springer
author_facet Pola Waissman
Ron Berant
Lisa Amir
Shimon Reif
Shmuel Springer
author_sort Pola Waissman
collection DOAJ
description Background/ObjectivesPediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a global health concern. This study evaluates the utility of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) as a tool for assessing PFC among clinicians with varying levels of ultrasound (US) experience. We assessed the validity of PsUS in measuring transverse rectal diameter (TRD) and rectal anterior wall thickness (RAWT) compared to conventional US and to evaluate agreement between expert and novice clinicians.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, TRD and RAWT were measured using conventional US and PsUS in 52 children (PFC: n = 28; non-constipated: n = 24), aged 4–14 years. Measurements were performed by an experienced and a novice clinician. Agreement and validity were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.ResultsHigh agreement was found between the experienced and novice clinicians in assessing PFC using conventional US (ICC for TRD = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99; ICC for RAWT = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99) and PsUS (ICC for TRD = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99; ICC for RAWT = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.98). PsUS showed robust validity compared to conventional US (ICCs of 0.96 for TRD and 0.87 for RAWT). ROC analysis showed high diagnostic accuracy for PsUS at TRD [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.88, cut-off 30.25 mm] and RAWT (AUC = 0.91, cut-off 2.05 mm).ConclusionsThese results suggest PsUS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing PFC, that can be used by clinicians with varying levels of US experience.
format Article
id doaj-art-082e78317d7f4098872170229bdff22d
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-2360
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj-art-082e78317d7f4098872170229bdff22d2025-08-20T03:36:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602025-08-011310.3389/fped.2025.16240701624070Pocket-sized hand-held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert cliniciansPola Waissman0Ron Berant1Lisa Amir2Shimon Reif3Shmuel Springer4Neuromuscular and Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel, IsraelDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, IsraelDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, IsraelDepartment of Pediatrics, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, IsraelNeuromuscular and Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel, IsraelBackground/ObjectivesPediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a global health concern. This study evaluates the utility of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) as a tool for assessing PFC among clinicians with varying levels of ultrasound (US) experience. We assessed the validity of PsUS in measuring transverse rectal diameter (TRD) and rectal anterior wall thickness (RAWT) compared to conventional US and to evaluate agreement between expert and novice clinicians.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, TRD and RAWT were measured using conventional US and PsUS in 52 children (PFC: n = 28; non-constipated: n = 24), aged 4–14 years. Measurements were performed by an experienced and a novice clinician. Agreement and validity were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.ResultsHigh agreement was found between the experienced and novice clinicians in assessing PFC using conventional US (ICC for TRD = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99; ICC for RAWT = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99) and PsUS (ICC for TRD = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99; ICC for RAWT = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.98). PsUS showed robust validity compared to conventional US (ICCs of 0.96 for TRD and 0.87 for RAWT). ROC analysis showed high diagnostic accuracy for PsUS at TRD [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.88, cut-off 30.25 mm] and RAWT (AUC = 0.91, cut-off 2.05 mm).ConclusionsThese results suggest PsUS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing PFC, that can be used by clinicians with varying levels of US experience.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1624070/fullpediatric functional constipationpocket-sized ultrasoundpoint-of-care ultrasoundrectal wall thicknesstransverse rectal diameter
spellingShingle Pola Waissman
Ron Berant
Lisa Amir
Shimon Reif
Shmuel Springer
Pocket-sized hand-held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert clinicians
Frontiers in Pediatrics
pediatric functional constipation
pocket-sized ultrasound
point-of-care ultrasound
rectal wall thickness
transverse rectal diameter
title Pocket-sized hand-held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert clinicians
title_full Pocket-sized hand-held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert clinicians
title_fullStr Pocket-sized hand-held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Pocket-sized hand-held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert clinicians
title_short Pocket-sized hand-held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert clinicians
title_sort pocket sized hand held ultrasound for evaluating pediatric functional constipation by both novice and expert clinicians
topic pediatric functional constipation
pocket-sized ultrasound
point-of-care ultrasound
rectal wall thickness
transverse rectal diameter
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1624070/full
work_keys_str_mv AT polawaissman pocketsizedhandheldultrasoundforevaluatingpediatricfunctionalconstipationbybothnoviceandexpertclinicians
AT ronberant pocketsizedhandheldultrasoundforevaluatingpediatricfunctionalconstipationbybothnoviceandexpertclinicians
AT lisaamir pocketsizedhandheldultrasoundforevaluatingpediatricfunctionalconstipationbybothnoviceandexpertclinicians
AT shimonreif pocketsizedhandheldultrasoundforevaluatingpediatricfunctionalconstipationbybothnoviceandexpertclinicians
AT shmuelspringer pocketsizedhandheldultrasoundforevaluatingpediatricfunctionalconstipationbybothnoviceandexpertclinicians