Current Advances in the Perioperative Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a highly aggressive disease with a significant risk of recurrence with metastatic disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been the preferred approach for cisplatin-eligible patients, with regimens such as dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and ci...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
THE HEALTHBOOK COMPANY LTD.
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | healthbook TIMES. Oncology Hematology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.36000/HBT.OH.2025.24.184 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a highly aggressive disease with a significant risk of recurrence with metastatic disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been the preferred approach for cisplatin-eligible patients, with regimens such as dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (ddMVAC), as well as gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC). Recent trials adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the perioperative setting have shown promising results. Notably, the phase III NIAGARA trial established durvalumab plus GC as a new standard of care for perioperative treatment of cisplatin-eligible patients with MIBC. For cisplatin-ineligible patients, comprising approximately half of the MIBC population, alternative treatment strategies are explored in clinical trials, including immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and novel drug combinations. Furthermore, the emergence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker for treatment guidance is under investigation for risk stratification and personalization of adjuvant immunotherapy. This review article highlights the current practice in MIBC management, focusing on neoadjuvant and perioperative treatment strategies, novel therapeutic approaches and the evolving role of biomarkers in guiding clinical decisions.
PEER REVIEWED ARTICLE
**Peer reviewers:**
Prof. Maria De Santis, Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, and Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
One anonymous peer reviewer
This article was received on May 14, 2025; accepted after peer review on June 25, 2025; published on June 27, 2025. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2673-2092 2673-2106 |