Performance, Test-retest Reliability, and Measurement Error of the Upper Limb Seated Shot Put Test According to Different Positions of Execution

# BACKGROUND The unilateral Seated Shot-Put Test (USSPT) is an easy to apply, inexpensive tool that can be used to assess shoulder performance unilaterally. Two different positions of execution have been described in previous studies, however, differences regarding reference values and psychometr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gustavo O Tagliarini, José R. de S Junior, Glauber M, P Barbosa, Leonardo L B Secchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2023-06-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.75227
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825139370093445120
author Gustavo O Tagliarini
José R. de S Junior
Glauber M, P Barbosa
Leonardo L B Secchi
author_facet Gustavo O Tagliarini
José R. de S Junior
Glauber M, P Barbosa
Leonardo L B Secchi
author_sort Gustavo O Tagliarini
collection DOAJ
description # BACKGROUND The unilateral Seated Shot-Put Test (USSPT) is an easy to apply, inexpensive tool that can be used to assess shoulder performance unilaterally. Two different positions of execution have been described in previous studies, however, differences regarding reference values and psychometric properties were not assessed. # PURPOSE To investigate the performance, test-retest reliability and measurement error of the USSPT according to different positions of execution (floor versus chair) in overhead athletes. The hypothesis was that both positions would present similar values, good to excellent test-retest reliability and clinically acceptable measures. # STUDY DESIGN Test-retest reliability. # METHODS Forty-four overhead athletes performed the USSPT on the floor (USSPT-F) and on a chair (USSPT-C). Normative values were established according to gender, age, and dominance. Test-retest reliability was determined using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and measurement error through Standard Error of Measurement, Smallest Detectable Change, as well as Bland and Altman plots. # RESULTS Reference values for both positions were provided. Women performed better on the USSPT-C than USSPT-F. Excellent test-retest reliability 0.97 (0.89 -- 0.99) for dominant side and 0.95 (0.80 -- 0.98) for non-dominant side was found for the USSPT-F. Moderate to excellent reliability 0.91 (0.67 -- 0.98) for dominant side and 0.74 (0.01 -- 0.93) for non-dominant side was found for the USSPT-C. Presence of systematic error (14.76 cm) was found only for USSPT-C dominant (p=0.011). # CONCLUSION Differences were found only for women with better performance on the USSPT-C. The USSPT-F presented higher reliability values. Both tests presented clinically acceptable measures. Presence of systematic error was found only in the USSPT-C. # LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3
format Article
id doaj-art-081e1d00f4e94c66b6018928633103d4
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-081e1d00f4e94c66b6018928633103d42025-02-11T20:29:47ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962023-06-01183Performance, Test-retest Reliability, and Measurement Error of the Upper Limb Seated Shot Put Test According to Different Positions of ExecutionGustavo O TagliariniJosé R. de S JuniorGlauber M, P BarbosaLeonardo L B Secchi# BACKGROUND The unilateral Seated Shot-Put Test (USSPT) is an easy to apply, inexpensive tool that can be used to assess shoulder performance unilaterally. Two different positions of execution have been described in previous studies, however, differences regarding reference values and psychometric properties were not assessed. # PURPOSE To investigate the performance, test-retest reliability and measurement error of the USSPT according to different positions of execution (floor versus chair) in overhead athletes. The hypothesis was that both positions would present similar values, good to excellent test-retest reliability and clinically acceptable measures. # STUDY DESIGN Test-retest reliability. # METHODS Forty-four overhead athletes performed the USSPT on the floor (USSPT-F) and on a chair (USSPT-C). Normative values were established according to gender, age, and dominance. Test-retest reliability was determined using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and measurement error through Standard Error of Measurement, Smallest Detectable Change, as well as Bland and Altman plots. # RESULTS Reference values for both positions were provided. Women performed better on the USSPT-C than USSPT-F. Excellent test-retest reliability 0.97 (0.89 -- 0.99) for dominant side and 0.95 (0.80 -- 0.98) for non-dominant side was found for the USSPT-F. Moderate to excellent reliability 0.91 (0.67 -- 0.98) for dominant side and 0.74 (0.01 -- 0.93) for non-dominant side was found for the USSPT-C. Presence of systematic error (14.76 cm) was found only for USSPT-C dominant (p=0.011). # CONCLUSION Differences were found only for women with better performance on the USSPT-C. The USSPT-F presented higher reliability values. Both tests presented clinically acceptable measures. Presence of systematic error was found only in the USSPT-C. # LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.75227
spellingShingle Gustavo O Tagliarini
José R. de S Junior
Glauber M, P Barbosa
Leonardo L B Secchi
Performance, Test-retest Reliability, and Measurement Error of the Upper Limb Seated Shot Put Test According to Different Positions of Execution
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title Performance, Test-retest Reliability, and Measurement Error of the Upper Limb Seated Shot Put Test According to Different Positions of Execution
title_full Performance, Test-retest Reliability, and Measurement Error of the Upper Limb Seated Shot Put Test According to Different Positions of Execution
title_fullStr Performance, Test-retest Reliability, and Measurement Error of the Upper Limb Seated Shot Put Test According to Different Positions of Execution
title_full_unstemmed Performance, Test-retest Reliability, and Measurement Error of the Upper Limb Seated Shot Put Test According to Different Positions of Execution
title_short Performance, Test-retest Reliability, and Measurement Error of the Upper Limb Seated Shot Put Test According to Different Positions of Execution
title_sort performance test retest reliability and measurement error of the upper limb seated shot put test according to different positions of execution
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.75227
work_keys_str_mv AT gustavootagliarini performancetestretestreliabilityandmeasurementerroroftheupperlimbseatedshotputtestaccordingtodifferentpositionsofexecution
AT joserdesjunior performancetestretestreliabilityandmeasurementerroroftheupperlimbseatedshotputtestaccordingtodifferentpositionsofexecution
AT glaubermpbarbosa performancetestretestreliabilityandmeasurementerroroftheupperlimbseatedshotputtestaccordingtodifferentpositionsofexecution
AT leonardolbsecchi performancetestretestreliabilityandmeasurementerroroftheupperlimbseatedshotputtestaccordingtodifferentpositionsofexecution