Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes—part I: mean effects on various performance measures
IntroductionMeta-analysts have found that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves physical performance, but limited evidence exists regarding its effects on highly trained athletes, measures beyond maximum oxygen uptake (V˙O2max), and the moderating effects of different types of HIIT. In th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1486526/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841561012179828736 |
---|---|
author | Hans-Peter Wiesinger Hans-Peter Wiesinger Hans-Peter Wiesinger Thomas Leonard Stöggl Thomas Leonard Stöggl Nils Haller Nils Haller Julia Blumkaitis Tilmann Strepp Francesca Kilzer Anna Schmuttermair Will G. Hopkins |
author_facet | Hans-Peter Wiesinger Hans-Peter Wiesinger Hans-Peter Wiesinger Thomas Leonard Stöggl Thomas Leonard Stöggl Nils Haller Nils Haller Julia Blumkaitis Tilmann Strepp Francesca Kilzer Anna Schmuttermair Will G. Hopkins |
author_sort | Hans-Peter Wiesinger |
collection | DOAJ |
description | IntroductionMeta-analysts have found that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves physical performance, but limited evidence exists regarding its effects on highly trained athletes, measures beyond maximum oxygen uptake (V˙O2max), and the moderating effects of different types of HIIT. In this study, we present meta-analyses of the effects of HIIT focusing on these deficits.MethodsThe effects of 6 types of HIIT and other moderators were derived from 34 studies involving highly trained endurance and elite athletes in percent units via log-transformation from separate meta-regression mixed models for sprint, time–trial, aerobic/anaerobic threshold, peak speed/power, repeated-sprint ability, V˙O2max, and exercise economy. The level of evidence for effect magnitudes was evaluated based on the effect uncertainty and the smallest important change of 1%.ResultsCompared with control training, HIIT showed good to excellent evidence for the substantial enhancement of most measures for some athlete subgroups in practically important study settings defined by effect moderators (maximum of 12.6%, for endurance female athletes after 6 weeks of aerobic traditional long intervals). The assessment of the moderators indicated good evidence of greater effects as follows: with more aerobic types of HIIT for V˙O2max (+2.6%); with HIIT added to conventional training for most measures (+1.1–2.3%); during the competition phase for V˙O2max (+4.3%); and with tests of longer duration for sprint (+5.5%) and time trial (+4.9%). The effects of sex and type of athlete were unclear moderators. The heterogeneity of HIIT effects within a given type of setting varied from small to moderate (standard deviations of 1.1%–2.3%) and reduced the evidence of benefit in some settings.ConclusionAlthough athletes in some settings can be confident of the beneficial effects of HIIT on some measures related to competition performance, further research is needed. There is uncertainty regarding the mean effects on exercise economy and the modifying effects of sex, duration of intervention, phase of training, and type of HIIT for most measures.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=236384. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-07fe9f35c7074540beda8c7d483a8321 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1664-042X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Physiology |
spelling | doaj-art-07fe9f35c7074540beda8c7d483a83212025-01-03T06:47:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2025-01-011510.3389/fphys.2024.14865261486526Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes—part I: mean effects on various performance measuresHans-Peter Wiesinger0Hans-Peter Wiesinger1Hans-Peter Wiesinger2Thomas Leonard Stöggl3Thomas Leonard Stöggl4Nils Haller5Nils Haller6Julia Blumkaitis7Tilmann Strepp8Francesca Kilzer9Anna Schmuttermair10Will G. Hopkins11Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, Center for Public Health and Healthcare Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, AustriaInstitute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health and Healthcare Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaRed Bull Athlete Performance Center, Thalgau, AustriaDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaRed Bull Athlete Performance Center, Thalgau, AustriaInternet Society for Sport Science, Auckland, New ZealandIntroductionMeta-analysts have found that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves physical performance, but limited evidence exists regarding its effects on highly trained athletes, measures beyond maximum oxygen uptake (V˙O2max), and the moderating effects of different types of HIIT. In this study, we present meta-analyses of the effects of HIIT focusing on these deficits.MethodsThe effects of 6 types of HIIT and other moderators were derived from 34 studies involving highly trained endurance and elite athletes in percent units via log-transformation from separate meta-regression mixed models for sprint, time–trial, aerobic/anaerobic threshold, peak speed/power, repeated-sprint ability, V˙O2max, and exercise economy. The level of evidence for effect magnitudes was evaluated based on the effect uncertainty and the smallest important change of 1%.ResultsCompared with control training, HIIT showed good to excellent evidence for the substantial enhancement of most measures for some athlete subgroups in practically important study settings defined by effect moderators (maximum of 12.6%, for endurance female athletes after 6 weeks of aerobic traditional long intervals). The assessment of the moderators indicated good evidence of greater effects as follows: with more aerobic types of HIIT for V˙O2max (+2.6%); with HIIT added to conventional training for most measures (+1.1–2.3%); during the competition phase for V˙O2max (+4.3%); and with tests of longer duration for sprint (+5.5%) and time trial (+4.9%). The effects of sex and type of athlete were unclear moderators. The heterogeneity of HIIT effects within a given type of setting varied from small to moderate (standard deviations of 1.1%–2.3%) and reduced the evidence of benefit in some settings.ConclusionAlthough athletes in some settings can be confident of the beneficial effects of HIIT on some measures related to competition performance, further research is needed. There is uncertainty regarding the mean effects on exercise economy and the modifying effects of sex, duration of intervention, phase of training, and type of HIIT for most measures.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=236384.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1486526/fullmeta-regressionendurancesprintperformanceinterval trainingelite athletes |
spellingShingle | Hans-Peter Wiesinger Hans-Peter Wiesinger Hans-Peter Wiesinger Thomas Leonard Stöggl Thomas Leonard Stöggl Nils Haller Nils Haller Julia Blumkaitis Tilmann Strepp Francesca Kilzer Anna Schmuttermair Will G. Hopkins Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes—part I: mean effects on various performance measures Frontiers in Physiology meta-regression endurance sprint performance interval training elite athletes |
title | Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes—part I: mean effects on various performance measures |
title_full | Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes—part I: mean effects on various performance measures |
title_fullStr | Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes—part I: mean effects on various performance measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes—part I: mean effects on various performance measures |
title_short | Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes—part I: mean effects on various performance measures |
title_sort | meta analyses of the effects of high intensity interval training in elite athletes part i mean effects on various performance measures |
topic | meta-regression endurance sprint performance interval training elite athletes |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1486526/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanspeterwiesinger metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT hanspeterwiesinger metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT hanspeterwiesinger metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT thomasleonardstoggl metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT thomasleonardstoggl metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT nilshaller metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT nilshaller metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT juliablumkaitis metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT tilmannstrepp metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT francescakilzer metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT annaschmuttermair metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures AT willghopkins metaanalysesoftheeffectsofhighintensityintervaltrainingineliteathletespartimeaneffectsonvariousperformancemeasures |