Evaluation of Three Different Reinforcements of Composites in Cervical Restoration under Multiaxial Loading—An In vitro Study
Aim: The primary objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the fracture resistance of class V composite restorations under multiaxial loading that were reinforced with Ribbond, Interlig, and GC everX Flow. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two freshly extracted maxillary premolars were randoml...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1437_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849709284392173568 |
|---|---|
| author | Nikesh S. Murali Revathy Parthasarathy Deepika Lakshmaiah Nivetha Ambeth Sankar Vishwanath Sangita Ilango |
| author_facet | Nikesh S. Murali Revathy Parthasarathy Deepika Lakshmaiah Nivetha Ambeth Sankar Vishwanath Sangita Ilango |
| author_sort | Nikesh S. Murali |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim:
The primary objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the fracture resistance of class V composite restorations under multiaxial loading that were reinforced with Ribbond, Interlig, and GC everX Flow.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty-two freshly extracted maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to four groups of eight teeth each. Cavities were prepared in the cervical region. Group 1 received Ribbond, Group 2 received Interlig™, and Group 3 received GC EverX Flow™ in the cavity floor, followed by composite restoration. Group 4 had regular resin composites with no reinforcement. The teeth were then tested under multiaxial loading in a universal testing machine, and fracture values were recorded.
Results:
Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA and Tuckey’s post hoc test. Statistical significance was set at P value < 0.05. GC everX Flow showed the highest fracture resistance, followed by other groups.
Conclusion:
Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the class V cavities restored with reinforced composites considerably increased the fracture resistance of the restored teeth. In a descending order, GC everX flow, Ribbond, and Interlig are effective in reinforcing the class V cavities restored with composites. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-07c429de6b1e4223a20e2d6d422033ea |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-07c429de6b1e4223a20e2d6d422033ea2025-08-20T03:15:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062025-06-0117Suppl 2S1920S192310.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1437_24Evaluation of Three Different Reinforcements of Composites in Cervical Restoration under Multiaxial Loading—An In vitro StudyNikesh S. MuraliRevathy ParthasarathyDeepika LakshmaiahNivetha AmbethSankar VishwanathSangita IlangoAim: The primary objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the fracture resistance of class V composite restorations under multiaxial loading that were reinforced with Ribbond, Interlig, and GC everX Flow. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two freshly extracted maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to four groups of eight teeth each. Cavities were prepared in the cervical region. Group 1 received Ribbond, Group 2 received Interlig™, and Group 3 received GC EverX Flow™ in the cavity floor, followed by composite restoration. Group 4 had regular resin composites with no reinforcement. The teeth were then tested under multiaxial loading in a universal testing machine, and fracture values were recorded. Results: Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA and Tuckey’s post hoc test. Statistical significance was set at P value < 0.05. GC everX Flow showed the highest fracture resistance, followed by other groups. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the class V cavities restored with reinforced composites considerably increased the fracture resistance of the restored teeth. In a descending order, GC everX flow, Ribbond, and Interlig are effective in reinforcing the class V cavities restored with composites.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1437_24cervical cavitygc everxinterligreinforced compositeribbond |
| spellingShingle | Nikesh S. Murali Revathy Parthasarathy Deepika Lakshmaiah Nivetha Ambeth Sankar Vishwanath Sangita Ilango Evaluation of Three Different Reinforcements of Composites in Cervical Restoration under Multiaxial Loading—An In vitro Study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences cervical cavity gc everx interlig reinforced composite ribbond |
| title | Evaluation of Three Different Reinforcements of Composites in Cervical Restoration under Multiaxial Loading—An In vitro Study |
| title_full | Evaluation of Three Different Reinforcements of Composites in Cervical Restoration under Multiaxial Loading—An In vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of Three Different Reinforcements of Composites in Cervical Restoration under Multiaxial Loading—An In vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Three Different Reinforcements of Composites in Cervical Restoration under Multiaxial Loading—An In vitro Study |
| title_short | Evaluation of Three Different Reinforcements of Composites in Cervical Restoration under Multiaxial Loading—An In vitro Study |
| title_sort | evaluation of three different reinforcements of composites in cervical restoration under multiaxial loading an in vitro study |
| topic | cervical cavity gc everx interlig reinforced composite ribbond |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1437_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nikeshsmurali evaluationofthreedifferentreinforcementsofcompositesincervicalrestorationundermultiaxialloadinganinvitrostudy AT revathyparthasarathy evaluationofthreedifferentreinforcementsofcompositesincervicalrestorationundermultiaxialloadinganinvitrostudy AT deepikalakshmaiah evaluationofthreedifferentreinforcementsofcompositesincervicalrestorationundermultiaxialloadinganinvitrostudy AT nivethaambeth evaluationofthreedifferentreinforcementsofcompositesincervicalrestorationundermultiaxialloadinganinvitrostudy AT sankarvishwanath evaluationofthreedifferentreinforcementsofcompositesincervicalrestorationundermultiaxialloadinganinvitrostudy AT sangitailango evaluationofthreedifferentreinforcementsofcompositesincervicalrestorationundermultiaxialloadinganinvitrostudy |