Impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment (Antarctica) since the Last Glacial Maximum

<p>Ice streams in the Ross Sea Embayment (West Antarctica) retreated up to 1000 km since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). One way that bathymetry influenced this retreat was through the presence of local bathymetric highs, or pinning points, which decreased ice flux through the grounding line a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. T. Kodama, T. Pico, A. A. Robel, J. E. Christian, N. Gomez, C. Vigilia, E. Powell, J. Gagliardi, S. Tulaczyk, T. Blackburn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025-08-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/2935/2025/tc-19-2935-2025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850038044919332864
author S. T. Kodama
T. Pico
A. A. Robel
J. E. Christian
N. Gomez
C. Vigilia
E. Powell
J. Gagliardi
S. Tulaczyk
T. Blackburn
author_facet S. T. Kodama
T. Pico
A. A. Robel
J. E. Christian
N. Gomez
C. Vigilia
E. Powell
J. Gagliardi
S. Tulaczyk
T. Blackburn
author_sort S. T. Kodama
collection DOAJ
description <p>Ice streams in the Ross Sea Embayment (West Antarctica) retreated up to 1000 km since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). One way that bathymetry influenced this retreat was through the presence of local bathymetric highs, or pinning points, which decreased ice flux through the grounding line and slowed grounding line retreat. During this time, glacial isostatic adjustment vertically shifted the underlying bathymetry, altering the grounding line flux. Continental-scale modeling efforts have demonstrated how solid Earth–ice sheet interactions impact the deglacial retreat of marine ice sheets; however, these models are too coarse to resolve small-scale bathymetric features. We pair a high-resolution bathymetry model with a simple model of grounding line stability in an ensemble approach to predict zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment for given combinations of surface mass balance rate, degree of ice shelf buttressing, basal friction coefficient, and bathymetry (corrected for glacial isostatic adjustment using three different ice sheet histories). We find that isostatic depression within the interior of the Ross Sea Embayment during the LGM restricts zones where grounding lines can persist to near the edge of the continental shelf. Most grounding lines cannot persist near the present-day grounding line until sufficient uplift has occurred (mid-Holocene; <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 5 ka), and this uplift causes a net upstream migration of grounding line persistence zones across the deglaciation. Additionally, our results show that coarse-resolution bathymetry underpredicts possible stable grounding line positions, particularly near the present-day grounding line, highlighting the importance of bathymetric resolution in capturing the impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on ice stream stability.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-07bb9a24ddeb4eae94852d475308d995
institution DOAJ
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj-art-07bb9a24ddeb4eae94852d475308d9952025-08-20T02:56:40ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242025-08-01192935294810.5194/tc-19-2935-2025Impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment (Antarctica) since the Last Glacial MaximumS. T. Kodama0T. Pico1A. A. Robel2J. E. Christian3N. Gomez4C. Vigilia5E. Powell6J. Gagliardi7S. Tulaczyk8T. Blackburn9Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USAEarth and Planetary Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USASchool of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USADepartment of Geography, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USAEarth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, CanadaJackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USASeismology, Geology and Tectonophysics, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USAEarth and Planetary Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USAEarth and Planetary Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USAEarth and Planetary Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA<p>Ice streams in the Ross Sea Embayment (West Antarctica) retreated up to 1000 km since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). One way that bathymetry influenced this retreat was through the presence of local bathymetric highs, or pinning points, which decreased ice flux through the grounding line and slowed grounding line retreat. During this time, glacial isostatic adjustment vertically shifted the underlying bathymetry, altering the grounding line flux. Continental-scale modeling efforts have demonstrated how solid Earth–ice sheet interactions impact the deglacial retreat of marine ice sheets; however, these models are too coarse to resolve small-scale bathymetric features. We pair a high-resolution bathymetry model with a simple model of grounding line stability in an ensemble approach to predict zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment for given combinations of surface mass balance rate, degree of ice shelf buttressing, basal friction coefficient, and bathymetry (corrected for glacial isostatic adjustment using three different ice sheet histories). We find that isostatic depression within the interior of the Ross Sea Embayment during the LGM restricts zones where grounding lines can persist to near the edge of the continental shelf. Most grounding lines cannot persist near the present-day grounding line until sufficient uplift has occurred (mid-Holocene; <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 5 ka), and this uplift causes a net upstream migration of grounding line persistence zones across the deglaciation. Additionally, our results show that coarse-resolution bathymetry underpredicts possible stable grounding line positions, particularly near the present-day grounding line, highlighting the importance of bathymetric resolution in capturing the impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on ice stream stability.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/2935/2025/tc-19-2935-2025.pdf
spellingShingle S. T. Kodama
T. Pico
A. A. Robel
J. E. Christian
N. Gomez
C. Vigilia
E. Powell
J. Gagliardi
S. Tulaczyk
T. Blackburn
Impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment (Antarctica) since the Last Glacial Maximum
The Cryosphere
title Impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment (Antarctica) since the Last Glacial Maximum
title_full Impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment (Antarctica) since the Last Glacial Maximum
title_fullStr Impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment (Antarctica) since the Last Glacial Maximum
title_full_unstemmed Impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment (Antarctica) since the Last Glacial Maximum
title_short Impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the Ross Sea Embayment (Antarctica) since the Last Glacial Maximum
title_sort impact of glacial isostatic adjustment on zones of potential grounding line persistence in the ross sea embayment antarctica since the last glacial maximum
url https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/2935/2025/tc-19-2935-2025.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stkodama impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT tpico impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT aarobel impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT jechristian impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT ngomez impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT cvigilia impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT epowell impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT jgagliardi impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT stulaczyk impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum
AT tblackburn impactofglacialisostaticadjustmentonzonesofpotentialgroundinglinepersistenceintherossseaembaymentantarcticasincethelastglacialmaximum