Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care

Abstract Background Mental health services in the United Kingdom (UK) are experiencing heightened pressures due to an increase in the number of patients accessing secondary mental health services amidst a period of workforce and funding constraints. Patient prioritisation for inpatient clinical phar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatima Q. Alshaikhmubarak, Richard N. Keers, Petra Brown, Penny J. Lewis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06956-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849334439043137536
author Fatima Q. Alshaikhmubarak
Richard N. Keers
Petra Brown
Penny J. Lewis
author_facet Fatima Q. Alshaikhmubarak
Richard N. Keers
Petra Brown
Penny J. Lewis
author_sort Fatima Q. Alshaikhmubarak
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Mental health services in the United Kingdom (UK) are experiencing heightened pressures due to an increase in the number of patients accessing secondary mental health services amidst a period of workforce and funding constraints. Patient prioritisation for inpatient clinical pharmacy services is a promising approach to delivering optimal services with limited available resources. Research has identified several patient prioritisation tools used by acute care pharmacists across the UK, yet little is known about the use of pharmaceutical patient prioritisation approaches in mental health settings. Therefore, this study aimed to explore patient prioritisation approaches used by UK inpatient mental health pharmacy teams. Method An electronic national questionnaire was distributed among chief/senior pharmacists within all UK mental health organisations to identify the use of patient prioritisation systems (tools or processes). This was followed by semi-structured interviews with representative members from organisations that responded to the questionnaire and reported using prioritisation systems, and document analysis for prioritisation systems if shared. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis as described by Braun & Clarke. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Manchester Ethics Committee. Results A 75.3% (n = 55/73) response rate was achieved for the questionnaire between July 2022 and January 2023. Of organisations that completed the questionnaire, 38.2% (n = 21/55) used a prioritisation system within their inpatient pharmacy services in England (n = 14/21), Scotland (n = 6/21), and Northern Ireland (n = 1/21). Sixteen staff representatives from 15 organisations reporting the use of prioritisation systems were interviewed, and 11 prioritisation documents were received and analysed. Prioritisation systems varied greatly in their complexity and development approaches, and the majority were simplistic in design, developed solely based on existing expertise, and lacked formal evaluation. However, all prioritisation systems were perceived by staff to be beneficial in improving patient safety, standardising care, and optimising clinical pharmacy services. Prioritisation criteria included some high-risk medicines (e.g. lithium), issues related to mental health legislation, and patient related factors such as swallowing difficulties. Conclusion This study identified 21 UK-based mental health organisations using systems to prioritise inpatients for clinical pharmacy services. Patient prioritisation systems were reported to be beneficial for pharmacy teams in managing their workload and delivering services despite their reported limitations. However, interviews with a single representative may not fully capture the perspectives and experiences of others.
format Article
id doaj-art-078b46c5c1e641fe9d52ac959925cf56
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-244X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychiatry
spelling doaj-art-078b46c5c1e641fe9d52ac959925cf562025-08-20T03:45:34ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2025-07-0125112010.1186/s12888-025-06956-4Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient careFatima Q. Alshaikhmubarak0Richard N. Keers1Petra Brown2Penny J. Lewis3Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, The University of ManchesterDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, The University of ManchesterDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, The University of ManchesterDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, The University of ManchesterAbstract Background Mental health services in the United Kingdom (UK) are experiencing heightened pressures due to an increase in the number of patients accessing secondary mental health services amidst a period of workforce and funding constraints. Patient prioritisation for inpatient clinical pharmacy services is a promising approach to delivering optimal services with limited available resources. Research has identified several patient prioritisation tools used by acute care pharmacists across the UK, yet little is known about the use of pharmaceutical patient prioritisation approaches in mental health settings. Therefore, this study aimed to explore patient prioritisation approaches used by UK inpatient mental health pharmacy teams. Method An electronic national questionnaire was distributed among chief/senior pharmacists within all UK mental health organisations to identify the use of patient prioritisation systems (tools or processes). This was followed by semi-structured interviews with representative members from organisations that responded to the questionnaire and reported using prioritisation systems, and document analysis for prioritisation systems if shared. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis as described by Braun & Clarke. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Manchester Ethics Committee. Results A 75.3% (n = 55/73) response rate was achieved for the questionnaire between July 2022 and January 2023. Of organisations that completed the questionnaire, 38.2% (n = 21/55) used a prioritisation system within their inpatient pharmacy services in England (n = 14/21), Scotland (n = 6/21), and Northern Ireland (n = 1/21). Sixteen staff representatives from 15 organisations reporting the use of prioritisation systems were interviewed, and 11 prioritisation documents were received and analysed. Prioritisation systems varied greatly in their complexity and development approaches, and the majority were simplistic in design, developed solely based on existing expertise, and lacked formal evaluation. However, all prioritisation systems were perceived by staff to be beneficial in improving patient safety, standardising care, and optimising clinical pharmacy services. Prioritisation criteria included some high-risk medicines (e.g. lithium), issues related to mental health legislation, and patient related factors such as swallowing difficulties. Conclusion This study identified 21 UK-based mental health organisations using systems to prioritise inpatients for clinical pharmacy services. Patient prioritisation systems were reported to be beneficial for pharmacy teams in managing their workload and delivering services despite their reported limitations. However, interviews with a single representative may not fully capture the perspectives and experiences of others.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06956-4Patient prioritizationAcuityMental healthPsychiatryInpatientClinical pharmacy
spellingShingle Fatima Q. Alshaikhmubarak
Richard N. Keers
Petra Brown
Penny J. Lewis
Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care
BMC Psychiatry
Patient prioritization
Acuity
Mental health
Psychiatry
Inpatient
Clinical pharmacy
title Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care
title_full Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care
title_fullStr Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care
title_full_unstemmed Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care
title_short Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care
title_sort exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in uk mental health inpatient care
topic Patient prioritization
Acuity
Mental health
Psychiatry
Inpatient
Clinical pharmacy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06956-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fatimaqalshaikhmubarak exploringcurrentapproachestowardspatientprioritisationforclinicalpharmacyservicesinukmentalhealthinpatientcare
AT richardnkeers exploringcurrentapproachestowardspatientprioritisationforclinicalpharmacyservicesinukmentalhealthinpatientcare
AT petrabrown exploringcurrentapproachestowardspatientprioritisationforclinicalpharmacyservicesinukmentalhealthinpatientcare
AT pennyjlewis exploringcurrentapproachestowardspatientprioritisationforclinicalpharmacyservicesinukmentalhealthinpatientcare