A Critique to the Theory of "US Government Targeted Killings" in the Light of the Fundamental Principles and Procedures of International Humanitarian Law

In recent years, the US government has pursued a policy of targeted killings of those suspected of committing terrorist acts. This policy is often referred to as a legitimate and necessary response to terrorism and asymmetric wars. In this article, we seek to examine the conformity of targeted killi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahdi Hatami
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) 2018-07-01
Series:پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3230_53755a4ce5fae6a2c107a8a65963069c.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543808052887552
author Mahdi Hatami
author_facet Mahdi Hatami
author_sort Mahdi Hatami
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, the US government has pursued a policy of targeted killings of those suspected of committing terrorist acts. This policy is often referred to as a legitimate and necessary response to terrorism and asymmetric wars. In this article, we seek to examine the conformity of targeted killings with the findings of international law by examining this practice in the light of international law standards and, in particular, international humanitarian law. This policy is applied both to armed conflict and to peace. Therefore, in criticism and legal analysis of targeted killings, the requirements of international humanitarian law as well as the findings of human rights are emphasized and the application of such a function is examined and analyzed within the framework of these principles. After analyzing and elaborating on this case, the author concludes that targeted killings do not comply with humanitarian rights standards and it is necessary to prevent the establishment and legitimization of this phenomenon and to legitimize it within the framework of international law of international protest and condemnation.
format Article
id doaj-art-074dc7614ee547dca39a1d6fc855c04c
institution Kabale University
issn 2383-1650
language fas
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
record_format Article
series پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
spelling doaj-art-074dc7614ee547dca39a1d6fc855c04c2025-01-13T05:30:57ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی2383-16502018-07-011851311543230A Critique to the Theory of "US Government Targeted Killings" in the Light of the Fundamental Principles and Procedures of International Humanitarian LawMahdi Hatami0Assistant Professor of Department of Law, Kurdistan UniversityIn recent years, the US government has pursued a policy of targeted killings of those suspected of committing terrorist acts. This policy is often referred to as a legitimate and necessary response to terrorism and asymmetric wars. In this article, we seek to examine the conformity of targeted killings with the findings of international law by examining this practice in the light of international law standards and, in particular, international humanitarian law. This policy is applied both to armed conflict and to peace. Therefore, in criticism and legal analysis of targeted killings, the requirements of international humanitarian law as well as the findings of human rights are emphasized and the application of such a function is examined and analyzed within the framework of these principles. After analyzing and elaborating on this case, the author concludes that targeted killings do not comply with humanitarian rights standards and it is necessary to prevent the establishment and legitimization of this phenomenon and to legitimize it within the framework of international law of international protest and condemnation.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3230_53755a4ce5fae6a2c107a8a65963069c.pdfarmed conflictindirect participationdirect participationproportionality principleprinciple of separation
spellingShingle Mahdi Hatami
A Critique to the Theory of "US Government Targeted Killings" in the Light of the Fundamental Principles and Procedures of International Humanitarian Law
پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
armed conflict
indirect participation
direct participation
proportionality principle
principle of separation
title A Critique to the Theory of "US Government Targeted Killings" in the Light of the Fundamental Principles and Procedures of International Humanitarian Law
title_full A Critique to the Theory of "US Government Targeted Killings" in the Light of the Fundamental Principles and Procedures of International Humanitarian Law
title_fullStr A Critique to the Theory of "US Government Targeted Killings" in the Light of the Fundamental Principles and Procedures of International Humanitarian Law
title_full_unstemmed A Critique to the Theory of "US Government Targeted Killings" in the Light of the Fundamental Principles and Procedures of International Humanitarian Law
title_short A Critique to the Theory of "US Government Targeted Killings" in the Light of the Fundamental Principles and Procedures of International Humanitarian Law
title_sort critique to the theory of us government targeted killings in the light of the fundamental principles and procedures of international humanitarian law
topic armed conflict
indirect participation
direct participation
proportionality principle
principle of separation
url https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3230_53755a4ce5fae6a2c107a8a65963069c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mahdihatami acritiquetothetheoryofusgovernmenttargetedkillingsinthelightofthefundamentalprinciplesandproceduresofinternationalhumanitarianlaw
AT mahdihatami critiquetothetheoryofusgovernmenttargetedkillingsinthelightofthefundamentalprinciplesandproceduresofinternationalhumanitarianlaw