Comparative Evaluation of the New Angled Miniplate (Banana Plate) with the Conventional Miniplate for Management of Mandibular Angle Fracture

Introduction: Mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) are divisive and have led to debate in terms of treatment. The study evaluated the new angled miniplate (banana plate) with the conventional miniplate for management of MAFs. Patients and Methods: The study included 53 patients of MAFs, 26 treated with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keval Bhavsar, Ramita Sood, Tarang Mehta, Arpana Ludhwani, Sanjay Makwana, Shylaja K. Attur, Kinjal K. Bhavsar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1142_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) are divisive and have led to debate in terms of treatment. The study evaluated the new angled miniplate (banana plate) with the conventional miniplate for management of MAFs. Patients and Methods: The study included 53 patients of MAFs, 26 treated with the conventional miniplate (control group) and 27 with the angled miniplate (study group). The patients were followed up and evaluated for 6 months for mouth opening, bite force, and complications. Results: A longer operating time was noted in the study group. The mouth opening and bite force were higher in the study group with fewer postoperative complications. Conclusion: The new angled miniplate mimics the angle of the mandible and offers better tridimensional stability, fewer complications, and improved stability.
ISSN:0976-4879
0975-7406