Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany
The literature shows that limited research has been conducted on the changes induced by digital means in public participation processes on plans whose implementation could have an impact on nature conservation and landscape development. To contribute to closing this research gap, 15 expert interview...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Land |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/305 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850231520253444096 |
|---|---|
| author | Stefan Heiland Markus Günther Brigitte Holzhauer Florian Kern Josephin Wagner |
| author_facet | Stefan Heiland Markus Günther Brigitte Holzhauer Florian Kern Josephin Wagner |
| author_sort | Stefan Heiland |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The literature shows that limited research has been conducted on the changes induced by digital means in public participation processes on plans whose implementation could have an impact on nature conservation and landscape development. To contribute to closing this research gap, 15 expert interviews were conducted to shed light on the use of digital tools in public participation processes in Germany. The analysis examined potential changes in the quantity and diversity of participants, timing and duration of involvement, tone and content, and the influence of participation on decision-making. The experts’ experiences vary widely, and knowledge must still be consolidated. The findings suggest that using digital instruments can increase the number of participants and the variety of social groups they represent. Other factors, such as personal interest and implications or potential for conflict, are more crucial to participating. However, digital tools allow for easier participation at various stages of participation if all necessary information is provided online. The tone of the discussion appears to be significantly influenced by the specific digital tool used for participation; for example, a plenary video session may unfold in an orderly manner, but the concurrent chat discussion can become chaotic or even insulting without strict facilitation. Digital tools might increase public interest in planning processes and lead to a higher relevance of citizens’ opinions in decision-making. However, this does not necessarily impact its outcome, as various opinions can neutralize each other. Observing this development more intensively seems necessary to take advantage of opportunities and counteract digitalization risks. Nonetheless, it can be concluded that digital formats cannot and should not replace analog forms of participation; rather, both should be combined in hybrid forms. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-06b067515aa74afcab01913dbc23e976 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2073-445X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Land |
| spelling | doaj-art-06b067515aa74afcab01913dbc23e9762025-08-20T02:03:31ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2025-02-0114230510.3390/land14020305Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of GermanyStefan Heiland0Markus Günther1Brigitte Holzhauer2Florian Kern3Josephin Wagner4Chair of Landscape Planning and Development, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. EB 5, Straße des 17. Juni 145, 10623 Berlin, GermanyChair of Landscape Planning and Development, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. EB 5, Straße des 17. Juni 145, 10623 Berlin, GermanyHolzhauerei-Forschung und Beratung, Uhlandstraße 20, 68167 Mannheim, GermanyInstitute for Ecological Economy Research (IÖW), Potsdamer Str. 105, 10785 Berlin, GermanyInstitute for Ecological Economy Research (IÖW), Potsdamer Str. 105, 10785 Berlin, GermanyThe literature shows that limited research has been conducted on the changes induced by digital means in public participation processes on plans whose implementation could have an impact on nature conservation and landscape development. To contribute to closing this research gap, 15 expert interviews were conducted to shed light on the use of digital tools in public participation processes in Germany. The analysis examined potential changes in the quantity and diversity of participants, timing and duration of involvement, tone and content, and the influence of participation on decision-making. The experts’ experiences vary widely, and knowledge must still be consolidated. The findings suggest that using digital instruments can increase the number of participants and the variety of social groups they represent. Other factors, such as personal interest and implications or potential for conflict, are more crucial to participating. However, digital tools allow for easier participation at various stages of participation if all necessary information is provided online. The tone of the discussion appears to be significantly influenced by the specific digital tool used for participation; for example, a plenary video session may unfold in an orderly manner, but the concurrent chat discussion can become chaotic or even insulting without strict facilitation. Digital tools might increase public interest in planning processes and lead to a higher relevance of citizens’ opinions in decision-making. However, this does not necessarily impact its outcome, as various opinions can neutralize each other. Observing this development more intensively seems necessary to take advantage of opportunities and counteract digitalization risks. Nonetheless, it can be concluded that digital formats cannot and should not replace analog forms of participation; rather, both should be combined in hybrid forms.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/305digitalizationpublic participationnature conservationlandscapeplanning |
| spellingShingle | Stefan Heiland Markus Günther Brigitte Holzhauer Florian Kern Josephin Wagner Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany Land digitalization public participation nature conservation landscape planning |
| title | Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany |
| title_full | Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany |
| title_fullStr | Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany |
| title_full_unstemmed | Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany |
| title_short | Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany |
| title_sort | changes in nature conservation relevant public participation processes through digitalization the case of germany |
| topic | digitalization public participation nature conservation landscape planning |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/305 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stefanheiland changesinnatureconservationrelevantpublicparticipationprocessesthroughdigitalizationthecaseofgermany AT markusgunther changesinnatureconservationrelevantpublicparticipationprocessesthroughdigitalizationthecaseofgermany AT brigitteholzhauer changesinnatureconservationrelevantpublicparticipationprocessesthroughdigitalizationthecaseofgermany AT floriankern changesinnatureconservationrelevantpublicparticipationprocessesthroughdigitalizationthecaseofgermany AT josephinwagner changesinnatureconservationrelevantpublicparticipationprocessesthroughdigitalizationthecaseofgermany |