Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend‐Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching Methods

ABSTRACT Terrestrial water availability, quantified by precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P−E), is essential in Earth's water cycle, whereas model simulation of P−E is still largely biased and requires a post‐processing procedure. This study introduces the grid‐by‐grid cumulative distribut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingyi Li, Boqiang Qin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Science Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1312
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849254054338756608
author Jingyi Li
Boqiang Qin
author_facet Jingyi Li
Boqiang Qin
author_sort Jingyi Li
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Terrestrial water availability, quantified by precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P−E), is essential in Earth's water cycle, whereas model simulation of P−E is still largely biased and requires a post‐processing procedure. This study introduces the grid‐by‐grid cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching method to correct simulation bias in P−E, based on the ERA5‐Land dataset and outputs from 13 selected CMIP6 global climate models. The CDF matching method has a particular advantage in preserving the trends simulated by laws of physics in climate models, and three (additive, multiplicative, and additive–multiplicative mixed) trend preservation strategies are compared in this study. The cross‐validation from 1951 to 2014 indicates that all the trend preservation strategies effectively improve the simulated spatial characteristics of P−E with increased spatial correlation, enhanced sign agreement and reduced mean absolute error. Specifically, the additive strategy outperforms in improving the spatial similarity and accuracy of P−E in the humid region and global average, whereas the mixed strategy is the optimal in the hyper‐arid, arid, and semi‐arid regions. Furthermore, the mixed strategy has a significant advantage in preserving the signs of P−E across the globe. This study exhibits a computationally efficient statistical approach for bias correction of P−E simulation, and validates its flexible correction strategies regarding different terrestrial aridity conditions.
format Article
id doaj-art-069af7c106914fb48bfecaa0838fe53e
institution Kabale University
issn 1530-261X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Science Letters
spelling doaj-art-069af7c106914fb48bfecaa0838fe53e2025-08-20T03:56:09ZengWileyAtmospheric Science Letters1530-261X2025-07-01267n/an/a10.1002/asl.1312Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend‐Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching MethodsJingyi Li0Boqiang Qin1Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing ChinaNanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing ChinaABSTRACT Terrestrial water availability, quantified by precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P−E), is essential in Earth's water cycle, whereas model simulation of P−E is still largely biased and requires a post‐processing procedure. This study introduces the grid‐by‐grid cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching method to correct simulation bias in P−E, based on the ERA5‐Land dataset and outputs from 13 selected CMIP6 global climate models. The CDF matching method has a particular advantage in preserving the trends simulated by laws of physics in climate models, and three (additive, multiplicative, and additive–multiplicative mixed) trend preservation strategies are compared in this study. The cross‐validation from 1951 to 2014 indicates that all the trend preservation strategies effectively improve the simulated spatial characteristics of P−E with increased spatial correlation, enhanced sign agreement and reduced mean absolute error. Specifically, the additive strategy outperforms in improving the spatial similarity and accuracy of P−E in the humid region and global average, whereas the mixed strategy is the optimal in the hyper‐arid, arid, and semi‐arid regions. Furthermore, the mixed strategy has a significant advantage in preserving the signs of P−E across the globe. This study exhibits a computationally efficient statistical approach for bias correction of P−E simulation, and validates its flexible correction strategies regarding different terrestrial aridity conditions.https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1312application/contextbias correctionclimate modelglobalstatistical methods
spellingShingle Jingyi Li
Boqiang Qin
Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend‐Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching Methods
Atmospheric Science Letters
application/context
bias correction
climate model
global
statistical methods
title Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend‐Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching Methods
title_full Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend‐Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching Methods
title_fullStr Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend‐Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching Methods
title_full_unstemmed Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend‐Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching Methods
title_short Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend‐Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching Methods
title_sort bias correction of terrestrial water availability comparison of trend preserving cumulative distribution function matching methods
topic application/context
bias correction
climate model
global
statistical methods
url https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1312
work_keys_str_mv AT jingyili biascorrectionofterrestrialwateravailabilitycomparisonoftrendpreservingcumulativedistributionfunctionmatchingmethods
AT boqiangqin biascorrectionofterrestrialwateravailabilitycomparisonoftrendpreservingcumulativedistributionfunctionmatchingmethods