How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and Beyond

This paper addresses the question of how (not what) we should think about human rights and religious arguments. Thinking about this relationship is today particularly important, because conflicts over human rights in practice often turn around their theoretical problems. Should religious arguments b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mathias Thaler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra 2010-09-01
Series:e-cadernos ces
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/eces/553
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850164845472645120
author Mathias Thaler
author_facet Mathias Thaler
author_sort Mathias Thaler
collection DOAJ
description This paper addresses the question of how (not what) we should think about human rights and religious arguments. Thinking about this relationship is today particularly important, because conflicts over human rights in practice often turn around their theoretical problems. Should religious arguments be used to justify human rights? Or do we want human rights to be free from any partisan endorsement so as to avoid divisive interpretations of universal principles? Underlying these hard questions is the issue of justification in view of a plurality of cultural and religious traditions around the globe. If human rights can be transformed so as to defy the charge of Euro-centrism (of being parochially rooted in only one cultural and religious tradition), they need to creatively draw on, not pit themselves against, this plurality. This paper suggests a framework for such a positive and inclusive engagement with various cultures and religions that goes beyond the mainstream liberal model of “public reason”.
format Article
id doaj-art-0694c3333b0444aaa5d2a4bfef60d2a2
institution OA Journals
issn 1647-0737
language English
publishDate 2010-09-01
publisher Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra
record_format Article
series e-cadernos ces
spelling doaj-art-0694c3333b0444aaa5d2a4bfef60d2a22025-08-20T02:21:53ZengCentro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbrae-cadernos ces1647-07372010-09-01910.4000/eces.553How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and BeyondMathias ThalerThis paper addresses the question of how (not what) we should think about human rights and religious arguments. Thinking about this relationship is today particularly important, because conflicts over human rights in practice often turn around their theoretical problems. Should religious arguments be used to justify human rights? Or do we want human rights to be free from any partisan endorsement so as to avoid divisive interpretations of universal principles? Underlying these hard questions is the issue of justification in view of a plurality of cultural and religious traditions around the globe. If human rights can be transformed so as to defy the charge of Euro-centrism (of being parochially rooted in only one cultural and religious tradition), they need to creatively draw on, not pit themselves against, this plurality. This paper suggests a framework for such a positive and inclusive engagement with various cultures and religions that goes beyond the mainstream liberal model of “public reason”.https://journals.openedition.org/eces/553human rightsjustificationmodus vivendipluralismpublic reasonsecularism
spellingShingle Mathias Thaler
How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and Beyond
e-cadernos ces
human rights
justification
modus vivendi
pluralism
public reason
secularism
title How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and Beyond
title_full How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and Beyond
title_fullStr How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and Beyond
title_full_unstemmed How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and Beyond
title_short How (not What) Shall We Think about Human Rights and Religious Arguments? Public Reasoning and Beyond
title_sort how not what shall we think about human rights and religious arguments public reasoning and beyond
topic human rights
justification
modus vivendi
pluralism
public reason
secularism
url https://journals.openedition.org/eces/553
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiasthaler hownotwhatshallwethinkabouthumanrightsandreligiousargumentspublicreasoningandbeyond