The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Introduction This systematic review aimed to determine the clinical utility of various physical exam findings in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods A systematic review of English articles identified from PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases. Search term...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nihal Punjabi, Roy W. Qu, Alexandra Vacaru, Brianna Pandey, Shanalee Tamares, Jared C. Inman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70154
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849430458975125504
author Nihal Punjabi
Roy W. Qu
Alexandra Vacaru
Brianna Pandey
Shanalee Tamares
Jared C. Inman
author_facet Nihal Punjabi
Roy W. Qu
Alexandra Vacaru
Brianna Pandey
Shanalee Tamares
Jared C. Inman
author_sort Nihal Punjabi
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Introduction This systematic review aimed to determine the clinical utility of various physical exam findings in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods A systematic review of English articles identified from PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included “sleep apnea,” “physical exam,” “polysomnography,” and all relevant synonyms. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, reviewed full texts, and extracted data from all studies that presented associations between physical characteristics and apnea‐hypopnea index (AHI). Results A total of 35 studies representing 13,854 patients were included in this review. The mean difference between high AHI and low AHI groups was 4.09 kg/m2 (95% CI: 2.78–5.39) for BMI, 7.93 cm (3.59–12.28) for waist circumference, and 3.67 cm (2.64–4.71) for neck circumference. The odds ratios for having a high AHI were 2.44 (1.07–5.55) for macroglossia, 2.23 (1.68–2.96) for Mallampati > 2, 1.88 (1.67–2.11) for tonsil grade > 2, 3.99 (1.94–8.21) for pharyngeal grade > 2, and 1.57 (1.48–1.67) for enlarged uvula. Thyromental distance, retrognathia, Friedman grade, septal deviation, and enlarged turbinates were also assessed and were not found to be statistically significant between AHI groups. Discussion Several physical exams have strong evidence in the literature supporting their strength at differentiating patients with and without OSA. These should be used routinely among providers who treat OSA, regardless of specialty, to help guide decisions about recommending a sleep study and selecting appropriate treatment. Other physical characteristics may be better assessed through advanced exam techniques or require more research and standardization in the way they are assessed by practitioners.
format Article
id doaj-art-0692cf2c1d5c42688d1ea72a301d3eba
institution Kabale University
issn 2378-8038
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
spelling doaj-art-0692cf2c1d5c42688d1ea72a301d3eba2025-08-20T03:28:00ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382025-06-01103n/an/a10.1002/lio2.70154The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisNihal Punjabi0Roy W. Qu1Alexandra Vacaru2Brianna Pandey3Shanalee Tamares4Jared C. Inman5Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Loma Linda University Health Loma Linda California USADepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Loma Linda University Health Loma Linda California USALoma Linda University School of Medicine Loma Linda California USADepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Loma Linda University Health Loma Linda California USAUniversity Libraries, Loma Linda University Loma Linda California USADepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Loma Linda University Health Loma Linda California USAABSTRACT Introduction This systematic review aimed to determine the clinical utility of various physical exam findings in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods A systematic review of English articles identified from PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included “sleep apnea,” “physical exam,” “polysomnography,” and all relevant synonyms. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, reviewed full texts, and extracted data from all studies that presented associations between physical characteristics and apnea‐hypopnea index (AHI). Results A total of 35 studies representing 13,854 patients were included in this review. The mean difference between high AHI and low AHI groups was 4.09 kg/m2 (95% CI: 2.78–5.39) for BMI, 7.93 cm (3.59–12.28) for waist circumference, and 3.67 cm (2.64–4.71) for neck circumference. The odds ratios for having a high AHI were 2.44 (1.07–5.55) for macroglossia, 2.23 (1.68–2.96) for Mallampati > 2, 1.88 (1.67–2.11) for tonsil grade > 2, 3.99 (1.94–8.21) for pharyngeal grade > 2, and 1.57 (1.48–1.67) for enlarged uvula. Thyromental distance, retrognathia, Friedman grade, septal deviation, and enlarged turbinates were also assessed and were not found to be statistically significant between AHI groups. Discussion Several physical exams have strong evidence in the literature supporting their strength at differentiating patients with and without OSA. These should be used routinely among providers who treat OSA, regardless of specialty, to help guide decisions about recommending a sleep study and selecting appropriate treatment. Other physical characteristics may be better assessed through advanced exam techniques or require more research and standardization in the way they are assessed by practitioners.https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70154apnea‐hypopnea indexmeta‐analysisobstructive sleep apneaphysical exampolysomnography
spellingShingle Nihal Punjabi
Roy W. Qu
Alexandra Vacaru
Brianna Pandey
Shanalee Tamares
Jared C. Inman
The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
apnea‐hypopnea index
meta‐analysis
obstructive sleep apnea
physical exam
polysomnography
title The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort obstructive sleep apnea physical exam a systematic review and meta analysis
topic apnea‐hypopnea index
meta‐analysis
obstructive sleep apnea
physical exam
polysomnography
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70154
work_keys_str_mv AT nihalpunjabi theobstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT roywqu theobstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alexandravacaru theobstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT briannapandey theobstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shanaleetamares theobstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jaredcinman theobstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nihalpunjabi obstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT roywqu obstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alexandravacaru obstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT briannapandey obstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shanaleetamares obstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jaredcinman obstructivesleepapneaphysicalexamasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis