Potential U.S. Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons From Biomass With Addition of Massive External Heat and Hydrogen Inputs

ABSTRACT We estimate the U.S. potential to convert biomass into liquid hydrocarbons for fuel and chemical feedstocks, assuming massive low‐carbon external heat and hydrogen inputs. The biomass is first a carbon feedstock and only secondarily an energy source. This analysis is done for three estimate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. W. Charlton, C. W. Forsberg, B. E. Dale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-02-01
Series:GCB Bioenergy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70022
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577717321596928
author T. W. Charlton
C. W. Forsberg
B. E. Dale
author_facet T. W. Charlton
C. W. Forsberg
B. E. Dale
author_sort T. W. Charlton
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT We estimate the U.S. potential to convert biomass into liquid hydrocarbons for fuel and chemical feedstocks, assuming massive low‐carbon external heat and hydrogen inputs. The biomass is first a carbon feedstock and only secondarily an energy source. This analysis is done for three estimates of available biomass derived from the 2023 U.S. Department of Energy/U.S. Department of Agriculture “Billion‐Ton Report” and two augmented cases with maximum annual production of 1326, 4791, 5799, 7432, and 8745 million barrels of diesel fuel equivalent per year for the five cases. Constraints, such as assuring long‐term soil sustainability by recycling nutrients and some carbon back to soils, result in production being 70%–80% of these numbers. The U.S. currently consumes about 6900 million barrels of diesel fuel equivalent per year. Long‐term estimates for U.S. hydrocarbon consumption are between 50% and 75% of current consumption. External hydrogen additions for the conversion processes in the five cases are, respectively 25, 91, 111, 142, and 167 million tons of hydrogen per year. The system is strongly carbon negative because of carbon and nutrient recycling to soils to improve soil productivity.
format Article
id doaj-art-0691c82e7a444bdcbc858edc0e87ae6e
institution Kabale University
issn 1757-1693
1757-1707
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series GCB Bioenergy
spelling doaj-art-0691c82e7a444bdcbc858edc0e87ae6e2025-01-30T16:06:36ZengWileyGCB Bioenergy1757-16931757-17072025-02-01172n/an/a10.1111/gcbb.70022Potential U.S. Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons From Biomass With Addition of Massive External Heat and Hydrogen InputsT. W. Charlton0C. W. Forsberg1B. E. Dale2Imperial College London London UKMassachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Massachusetts USAMichigan State University Lansing Michigan USAABSTRACT We estimate the U.S. potential to convert biomass into liquid hydrocarbons for fuel and chemical feedstocks, assuming massive low‐carbon external heat and hydrogen inputs. The biomass is first a carbon feedstock and only secondarily an energy source. This analysis is done for three estimates of available biomass derived from the 2023 U.S. Department of Energy/U.S. Department of Agriculture “Billion‐Ton Report” and two augmented cases with maximum annual production of 1326, 4791, 5799, 7432, and 8745 million barrels of diesel fuel equivalent per year for the five cases. Constraints, such as assuring long‐term soil sustainability by recycling nutrients and some carbon back to soils, result in production being 70%–80% of these numbers. The U.S. currently consumes about 6900 million barrels of diesel fuel equivalent per year. Long‐term estimates for U.S. hydrocarbon consumption are between 50% and 75% of current consumption. External hydrogen additions for the conversion processes in the five cases are, respectively 25, 91, 111, 142, and 167 million tons of hydrogen per year. The system is strongly carbon negative because of carbon and nutrient recycling to soils to improve soil productivity.https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70022billion‐ton reportbiofuel productionbiomasshydrogenliquid hydrocarbonsUnited States
spellingShingle T. W. Charlton
C. W. Forsberg
B. E. Dale
Potential U.S. Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons From Biomass With Addition of Massive External Heat and Hydrogen Inputs
GCB Bioenergy
billion‐ton report
biofuel production
biomass
hydrogen
liquid hydrocarbons
United States
title Potential U.S. Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons From Biomass With Addition of Massive External Heat and Hydrogen Inputs
title_full Potential U.S. Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons From Biomass With Addition of Massive External Heat and Hydrogen Inputs
title_fullStr Potential U.S. Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons From Biomass With Addition of Massive External Heat and Hydrogen Inputs
title_full_unstemmed Potential U.S. Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons From Biomass With Addition of Massive External Heat and Hydrogen Inputs
title_short Potential U.S. Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons From Biomass With Addition of Massive External Heat and Hydrogen Inputs
title_sort potential u s production of liquid hydrocarbons from biomass with addition of massive external heat and hydrogen inputs
topic billion‐ton report
biofuel production
biomass
hydrogen
liquid hydrocarbons
United States
url https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70022
work_keys_str_mv AT twcharlton potentialusproductionofliquidhydrocarbonsfrombiomasswithadditionofmassiveexternalheatandhydrogeninputs
AT cwforsberg potentialusproductionofliquidhydrocarbonsfrombiomasswithadditionofmassiveexternalheatandhydrogeninputs
AT bedale potentialusproductionofliquidhydrocarbonsfrombiomasswithadditionofmassiveexternalheatandhydrogeninputs