Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review

In recent years, a range of academic disciplines have emphasized the potential benefits of prioritizing meaningful engagement with individuals and communities who have lived and have living experience with the topics, phenomena and problems researchers seek to study. In March 2022, we were asked to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin D Scher, Juliet Scott-Barrett, Matthew Hickman, Benjamin W Chrisinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Specialty Publications 2023-06-01
Series:Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.74807
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850103866668875776
author Benjamin D Scher
Juliet Scott-Barrett
Matthew Hickman
Benjamin W Chrisinger
author_facet Benjamin D Scher
Juliet Scott-Barrett
Matthew Hickman
Benjamin W Chrisinger
author_sort Benjamin D Scher
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, a range of academic disciplines have emphasized the potential benefits of prioritizing meaningful engagement with individuals and communities who have lived and have living experience with the topics, phenomena and problems researchers seek to study. In March 2022, we were asked to produce a paper to inform a university workshop and training materials to help students and faculty engage with participatory methods. In turn, we conducted a rapid scoping review of reviews to document key recommendations relating to methodology, logistics and ethics within the various modes of participatory research. Searches were conducted in Web of Science, SCOPUS, ProQuest, Pub Med, OVID (including Medline, PschyInfo/EMBASE, APAPsych) to identify published academic reviews (e.g., systematic, scoping, literature reviews and evidence gap maps), for best practices relating to participatory research. This approach drew out aggregated best practices and lessons learned across many primary studies and increased the speed of the review. From 276 studies imported for screening, 43 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility and 28 were deemed relevant for full inclusion. Results are presented as: 1) participatory research recommendations for researchers; and 2) participatory research recommendations for academic institutions. Three sub-themes emerged within the context of suggestions for researchers engaging with participatory methods: 1) early-stage considerations for study design and planning; 2) conducting the research; and 3) dissemination and knowledge exchange. This rapid scoping review highlights key recommendations for researchers interested in using participatory approaches in their own research, and for academic and institutional stakeholders who aim to support these practices.
format Article
id doaj-art-0673ec4e5f3d47cfaaec61186d0590d9
institution DOAJ
issn 2688-0261
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Specialty Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Participatory Research Methods
spelling doaj-art-0673ec4e5f3d47cfaaec61186d0590d92025-08-20T02:39:26ZengSpecialty PublicationsJournal of Participatory Research Methods2688-02612023-06-014210.35844/001c.74807Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping ReviewBenjamin D ScherJuliet Scott-BarrettMatthew HickmanBenjamin W ChrisingerIn recent years, a range of academic disciplines have emphasized the potential benefits of prioritizing meaningful engagement with individuals and communities who have lived and have living experience with the topics, phenomena and problems researchers seek to study. In March 2022, we were asked to produce a paper to inform a university workshop and training materials to help students and faculty engage with participatory methods. In turn, we conducted a rapid scoping review of reviews to document key recommendations relating to methodology, logistics and ethics within the various modes of participatory research. Searches were conducted in Web of Science, SCOPUS, ProQuest, Pub Med, OVID (including Medline, PschyInfo/EMBASE, APAPsych) to identify published academic reviews (e.g., systematic, scoping, literature reviews and evidence gap maps), for best practices relating to participatory research. This approach drew out aggregated best practices and lessons learned across many primary studies and increased the speed of the review. From 276 studies imported for screening, 43 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility and 28 were deemed relevant for full inclusion. Results are presented as: 1) participatory research recommendations for researchers; and 2) participatory research recommendations for academic institutions. Three sub-themes emerged within the context of suggestions for researchers engaging with participatory methods: 1) early-stage considerations for study design and planning; 2) conducting the research; and 3) dissemination and knowledge exchange. This rapid scoping review highlights key recommendations for researchers interested in using participatory approaches in their own research, and for academic and institutional stakeholders who aim to support these practices.https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.74807
spellingShingle Benjamin D Scher
Juliet Scott-Barrett
Matthew Hickman
Benjamin W Chrisinger
Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
title Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review
title_full Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review
title_fullStr Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review
title_short Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review
title_sort participatory research emergent recommendations for researchers and academic institutions a rapid scoping review
url https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.74807
work_keys_str_mv AT benjamindscher participatoryresearchemergentrecommendationsforresearchersandacademicinstitutionsarapidscopingreview
AT julietscottbarrett participatoryresearchemergentrecommendationsforresearchersandacademicinstitutionsarapidscopingreview
AT matthewhickman participatoryresearchemergentrecommendationsforresearchersandacademicinstitutionsarapidscopingreview
AT benjaminwchrisinger participatoryresearchemergentrecommendationsforresearchersandacademicinstitutionsarapidscopingreview